Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🔍کشف اسرار 🔍

Channel

🔍کشف اسرار 🔍

@kashfasrarravafez

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

437subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071345853
TypeChannel
Username@kashfasrarravafez
CreatedBetween 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kashfasrarravafez

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4364384375 August 2026 — 438 subscribers6 August 2026 — 438 subscribers19 August 2026 — 437 subscribers26 August 2026 — 436 subscribers11 September 2026 — 437 subscribers5 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 37 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 436–438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 19:20437+1
26 Aug 2026, 12:03436-1
19 Aug 2026, 08:02437-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:18438no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:51438first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1756.7%
930.0%
👎13.33%
👏13.33%
🔥13.33%
😢13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2023 to 14 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Dec 2025, 10:50 UTC187 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @almohajrina_walansar_documentsPhoto

احد شعراء وعلماء الشيعة كان مدمنًا للخمر وكان مشغوفاً بحب غلام له 🏳‍🌈🏳‍🌈

13 Dec 2025, 22:52 UTC197 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

من روايات الشيعة فإن ربك ينزل و السند صحيح

5 Dec 2025, 12:53 UTC197 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @alhadeth87Photo

🔴 الأخبارية والأصولية كل فريق يرى قتل الفريق الأخر⚔ الأخبارية مثل: - المجلسي - البحراني الأصولية مثل: - البهبهاني - الخوئي

1

19 Jul 2025, 15:08 UTC358 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @menhaj_sunna12

بیایید با یک نگاه منطقی و واقع‌بینانه بررسی کنیم: شعار تمسک به عترت و تبعیت از دوازده معصوم چه سود عملی و چه امتیازی برای پیروان مذهب شیعه در طول تاریخ و در آینده داشته و خواهد داشت؟⁉️ شیعیان همواره بر این باور بوده‌اند که پیروی از دوازده امام معصوم، مسیر رشد، هدایت و وحدت را هموار می‌کند و از تفرقه جلوگیری می‌نماید. آیا در عمل، این ادعا محقق شده است؟ ⁉️ بیایید به طور خاص‌تر به این موضوع بپردازیم که این گروه پر ادعا

👍21👎1🔥1

23 Mar 2025, 13:50 UTC495 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @menhaj_sunna12

طبق روايات مستفيض شیعه، حضرت عمار در ابتدا جزو افراد مرتد بود ( یا اینکه حدأقل مرتكب گناه کبیره شد و بعد از مدتی برگشت) #ارتداد #فرار #تکفیر پ ن : ما اهل سنت اين روايات را قبول نداريم و طرح اين روايات صرفاً جهت این است که ثابت کنیم نزد شیعه صحابه ای با گناه کبیره وجود دارد و نزد شیعه مقبول است سوال ⁉️ چرا شیعیان چنین شخصی را دوست دارند ؟ حتما میگویند یک مدتی مرتکب گناه کبیره شده بود و امام را تنها گذاشت و سپس توبه

1

19 Aug 2024, 09:41 UTC637 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @menhaj_sunna12

پاسخ کامل و جامع به شبهه شاب امرد یا همان خدای جوان و مو فرفری با خواندن این مطلب برای همیشه پاسخ این شبهه مزخرف و پوچ را فرا بگیرید قبل از هر چیز به این نکته مهم اشاره کنیم که صرف وجود یک روایت در کتاب ، دلیلی بر اعتقاد مؤلف نیست. چون ممکنه مؤلف کتاب از یک روایت ، معنا و مفهوم دیگری استنباط کرده باشد محمد تقی مجلسی : وجود روایت در کتاب علما ، دليل بر اعتقاد نيست چون ممکنه مؤلف از متن آن روایت، معنا و مفهوم دیگری

👍2

17 Aug 2024, 14:30 UTC527 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

مبحث نفی صدور فتوای رضاع کبیر از ام المؤمنین عایشه صدیقة https://t.me/rodoud_elmi/3306

3

6 Jul 2024, 16:49 UTC602 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @eulumhadith

┄┅━✺𖣐💖﴾﷽﴿💖𖣐✺━┅┄ 🔰 تحقیقاتـــــ [ حدیثۍ ] ڪاناݪ : ☸ نــقد هاۍ علمۍ @rodoud_elmi ☸ عݪــوم الـحديث @eulumhadith 💠منهج مطالعه و تخصص در علم حدیث [ ویژه اهل سنت ] ! 💠الصَمْـصَامْ اݪـدائـر عݪۍ مُثبِـتْ حَدِیث الطٰائِرْ « نقد حدیث طیر ورد شبهات» 💠إرشادُ اݪحیارۍٰ إلۍٰ أن أبابڪرٍ اݪـصدِّیـق أفضل الأمة بعد رسـولِ الله ﷺ «اثبات متواتر بودن گواه حضرت علۍ: "خَيْرُ هَذِهِ الْأُمَّةِ بَعْدَ نَبِيِّهَا أَبُو بَكْرٍ" » 💠إرشادُ

1👍1

3 Jul 2024, 12:59 UTC450 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @menhaj_sunna12Video

با دروغی دیگر از علی شریفی متخصص سوالات خنده دار 😂😂 آقای علی شریفی هتّاک ( تحصیلات حوزوی ندارد ، مطالب سایتها و دیگران را کپی میکند و به همین خاطر سوالات خنده دار مطرح میکند و سوتی میدهد 😂) در این کلیپ ادعا میکند: شیعه میگوید اکمال دین در غدیر خم به واسطه معرفی خلفای بعد از پیامبر اتفاق افتاده سوال ما: این ادعا را با روایت صحیح از غدیر از منابع شیعه در معرفی دوازده امام ثابت کنید از منابع شیعه برای معرفی ائمه در

👍1

10 Jun 2024, 20:21 UTC454 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @menhaj_sunna12

مژده به محققین اهل سنت 🌹 اکثر مطالب کانال منهاج السنة هشتگ گذاری شده و شما با جستجوی هشتگ میتوانید به راحتی و با صرفه جویی در وقت به مطالب مورد نظر برسید @menhaj_sunna12 برای مثال اگر در مباحث با شیعیان : به موضوع #علم_رجال و #توثیق نیاز دارید فقط کافیه این هشتگ را جستجو کنید وارد کانال شوید و این هشتگ را در قسمت بالا در محل جستجو تایپ کنید یا از زیر پستها روی هشتگ فشار دهید و خود به خود جستجو میکند ◀️موضوع #امامت

2👍1

8 Apr 2024, 01:26 UTC606 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

اگر بخواهیم به کلام امام جعفر صادق برسیم باید از چه واسطه ای استفاده کنیم ؟ شما فرض کنید امام جعفر صادق علیه السلام معصوم است . حال چگونه به کلام این امام بزرگوار برسیم ؟ از طریق #راویان فاسق https://t.me/menhaj_sunna12/5876 از طریق راویان فاسد https://t.me/menhaj_sunna12/7342 از طریق راوی خائن https://t.me/menhaj_sunna12/8199 از طریق راوی دزد https://t.me/menhaj_sunna12/7528 از طریق #راوی بی دین https://t.me/m

👍1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kashfasrarravafez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🔍کشف اسرار 🔍” (@kashfasrarravafez), 437 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kashfasrarravafez.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.