Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Slobodni ZAjedno

@SlobodniZajedno

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,437subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001506129447
TypeChannel
Username@SlobodniZajedno
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/SlobodniZajedno

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CijepljenjePravoIzbora/24189 Feb 2026, 15:46 UTC@SlobodniZajedno/10138 · this entry9 Feb 2026, 19:25 UTC1.003.6 hours
@CijepljenjePravoIzbora/241912 Feb 2026, 18:34 UTC@SlobodniZajedno/10140 · this entry12 Feb 2026, 18:57 UTC1.0023 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@CijepljenjePravoIzbora9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutes@CijepljenjePravoIzbora (63)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 January 2026 to 9 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @HrvatskaUdrugaRoditeljaAktivista. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,4373,4443,440.57 August 2026 — 3,444 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,444 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,437 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,436–3,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:213,437-7
7 Aug 2026, 05:153,444no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:053,444first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

438 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21549.1%
👏8419.2%
5913.5%
🔥409.13%
163.65%
❤‍🔥143.20%
👌81.83%
💯10.228%
🤔10.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,160 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sindikat_prosvjetiteljPhoto

POZIV NA ZANIMLJIV I VAŽAN SIMPOZIJ⬇️⬇️ U organizaciji Hrvatskog društva za primarnu zdravstvenu zaštitu Hrvatskog liječničkog zbora održat će se 7. znanstveno – stručni multidisciplinarni simpozij: DEFINICIJA ŽIVOTA, PRIZIV SAVJESTI I PLANIRANJE OBITELJI ⭕Petak, 12. lipnja, 16.30 - 20.00 Hrvatski Liječnički Zbor, Šubićeva 9, Zagreb ⭕Prijenos preko Zoom platforme ⭕Slobodan ulaz / prisustvo online Naši

👌85👍3

5 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,300 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HrvatskaUdrugaRoditeljaAktivistaPhoto

Svaki roditelj za svoje dijete želi najveću moguću dostupnu razinu zdravstvene zaštite. No, zakonska obveza u Hrvatskoj roditelje prečesto stavlja u ulogu pasivnih promatrača i oduzima im pravo na donošenje odluka o vlastitoj djeci. Umjesto otvorenog dijaloga, roditelji se na terenu suočavaju sa stigmatizacijom, prijetnjama i uvjetovanjima – od upisa u vrtiće do sportskih aktivnosti i to samo zbog preispitivanja opr

👍276

14 Apr 2026, 18:26 UTC≈2,160 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @kanalhipokrat

Hoćemo li izgubiti pravo na sjeme? Ključni trenutak za budućnost hrane u Europi | Biovrt - u skladu s prirodom https://www.biovrt.com/hocemo-li-izgubiti-pravo-na-sjeme-kljucni-trenutak-za-buducnost-hrane-u-europi/

👍36👏2

14 Apr 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,020 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sindikat_prosvjetiteljPhoto

PROMOCIJA KNJIGE AKADEMIKA KREŠIMIRA PAVELIĆA U MEĐUGORJU 📢⬇️⬇️ Pozivamo sve koji su u mogućnosti da dođu u subotu, 18. travnja 2026. godine u 19:00 sati u Herceg etno selu Međugorje na zanimljiv događaj u organizaciji našeg sindikata: predstavljanje iznimno važne knjige akademika Krešimira Pavelića „COVID-19: Mračna strana medicine“ - znanstvena ‘mapa’ za snalaženje u vremenima virusa i tzv. cjepiva Riječ je

👏13👍533

6 Apr 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,730 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HrvatskaUdrugaRoditeljaAktivista

Zadnji u nizu serijala objavljenih predavanja izdvojenih iz okruglog stola na temu cijepljenja protiv HPV-a progovara o važnosti ljudske savjesti i poštovanja iste. Priziv savjesti kompleksan je pojam, a pravni stručnjak Nikola Skenderović itekako se dobro razumije u njega i vodi vas u dubine razumijevanja istog. Otac je koji ne samo da je “slijepo vjerovao” sustavu, već uopće nije niti pomišljao na ikakvu mogućnost

5🔥5

26 Mar 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,880 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HrvatskaUdrugaRoditeljaAktivista

S druge strane igle ​Predstavljamo vam prvi u nizu videozapisa iz serijala nastalog na nedavnom okruglom stolu o temi uvođenja obveznog cijepljenja protiv HPV-a. ​Organizator ovog važnog događaja je Hrvatska udruga roditelja aktivista (HURA), koja ovim putem otvara prostor za argumentiranu raspravu o temama od javnozdravstvenog značaja. Ovaj video ujedno označava i početak naše nove emisije pod nazivom "S druge str

👏164❤‍🔥4🔥3💯1

23 Mar 2026, 20:48 UTC≈1,570 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HrvatskaUdrugaRoditeljaAktivista

Kako to obično biva, dogma zvana cijepljenje uporno prikazuje samo jednu stranu imunizacije – za vjernike te religije, druga, ona manje lijepa strana ne postoji, ili kako nam uporno ponavljaju – NUSPOJAVA NEMA. No je li to uistinu tako i što na ovu temu imaju reći znanstvenici i stručnjaci koji nikakvim sponama i obvezama nisu vezani za farmaceutsku industriju – pogledajte kroz naredne dane u materijalima koje ćemo o

🔥11👍32

10 Mar 2026, 16:16 UTC≈3,480 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Simpozij u Hrvatskom liječničkom zboru, A prijave za hibridni oblik preko Zoom platforme; 👇 https://forms.gle/eqpdE45f7efFh7Uk9 STRUKA I ZAINTERESIRANA JAVNOST, SVI STE POZVANI.

👍10👏5

24 Feb 2026, 16:25 UTC≈2,920 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Kopitom u glavu: Ti svome djetetu ubrizgaj spasonosni Gardasil, ja svome neću Uvođenje obveze cijepljenja Nekoć davno, davno, dok sam još živio tamo, tamo daleko, u zemlji bajki vjerovao sam stručljacima. To su one osobe koje svoj autoritet grade na tituli ili društvenoj poziciji, a ne na autoritetu znanja, argumenata i dokaza - i uvijek, bez iznimke, u korist vladajuće elite ili globalnih korporacija. U jednom sam

👍25❤‍🔥63🔥3👏1

16 Feb 2026, 21:44 UTC≈2,830 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Vjerujemo da se povjerenje u zdravstveni sustav ne može graditi prisilom, nego transparentnošću, otvorenim dijalogom i poštivanjem temeljnih prava. Zato tražimo: • očuvanje dobrovoljnosti HPV cijepljenja • potpunu i javno dostupnu transparentnost podataka o učinkovitosti, sigurnosti i mogućim nuspojavama • široku stručnu i javnu raspravu prije donošenja bilo kakve odluke o obveznom cijepljenju Ova peticija nije

👍254❤‍🔥4🔥2

12 Feb 2026, 18:57 UTC≈2,100 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @HrvatskaUdrugaRoditeljaAktivistaPhoto

📅 21. veljače 2026. 🕛12:00 h 📌 Hotel Antunović (Zagrebačka avenija 100a), Zagreb. Prljave igre, nevjerojatni profiti, oboljele mlade žene i pitanje: „Zašto toliko cjepiva sadrži aluminij – i što on radi ispod kože?“ Ovaj istraživački dokumentarac bavi se vrlo osjetljivom temom i otvara pitanje sigurnosti cjepiva, s posebnim naglaskom na aluminijeve spojeve koji se već desetljećima koriste kao adjuvansi u većini cjep

👍20🔥6

10 Feb 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ZABRANA DRUŠTVENIH MREŽA DJECI Kad netko kaže “štitimo djecu”, normalno je da kimnemo. I treba. Ali pravo pitanje je: kakav sustav gradimo da bismo to “proveli”? Jer zabrana nije samo zabrana. Zabrana je infrastruktura. U novom članku rastavljam ovu ideju do kraja i stavljam je u širi kontekst koji smo već godinama pratili u emisijama: 1. Provjera dobi = provjera identiteta (sustav koji se kasnije lako proširi na

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @SlobodniZajedno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 714,415 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Slobodni ZAjedno” (@SlobodniZajedno), 3,437 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SlobodniZajedno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.