Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TG KANÁL ‡ Radovan ANDRÁŠIK

Channel

TG KANÁL ‡ Radovan ANDRÁŠIK

@kanal_radovanandrasik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

634subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001271216229
TypeChannel
Username@kanal_radovanandrasik
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kanal_radovanandrasik

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

632645638.57 August 2026 — 645 subscribers8 August 2026 — 645 subscribers16 August 2026 — 643 subscribers23 August 2026 — 642 subscribers30 August 2026 — 635 subscribers9 September 2026 — 632 subscribers17 September 2026 — 634 subscribers6347 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 630–647 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:38634+2
9 Sept 2026, 01:02632-3
30 Aug 2026, 21:58635-7
23 Aug 2026, 16:35642-1
16 Aug 2026, 21:28643-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:47645no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:36645first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

715 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍37051.7%
16523.1%
🔥10414.5%
🤬446.15%
😢223.08%
👎101.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 715 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2024 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2026, 18:56 UTC512 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

„NEMÔŽEM DÝCHAŤ” 25. MÁJ 2020 Citát „Nemôžem dýchať” vyšlo z úst recidivistu, narkomana negroidného pôvodu, Georgeho Floyda. Liberálny politický tábor v spolupráci so svojimi štetkami, najmä z prostredia mainstreamu, urobili z každého bieleho človeka vinníka, a z každého negra boha. Došlo k ničeniu mestských infraštruktúr, k vypáleniu obchodov, zničeniu pamiatok v mene hesla „BLACK LIVES MATTER.” Belosi na celo

👍261😢1

23 Apr 2026, 17:29 UTC382 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @marianmagatoficialnyPhoto

Cesta ľahšieho odporu? Kde končí nacionalizmus? Teraz sranda bokom. Hovorme vážne. Časy sú zle a my skutoční nacionalisti to cítime na vlastnej koži. Výsluchy na polícii, väzba a roky vo výkonoch trestu. To je cena za našu slobodu. Bez strát neexistuje víťazstvo. Robíme to, pretože veríme tomu, čo hlásame. Sme antisionisti a antikomunisti. Sionizmus a komunizmus vzišli z toho istého mozgu. Našou politikou je naciona

👍177🔥2

24 Jan 2026, 21:15 UTC≈1,450 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

KONEČNE VONKU! Slovenský revizionista Marián Magát je konečne na slobode. Po štyroch rokoch, v tomto týždni, opustil brány väznice po tom, ako si dovolil pre weimarsky systém voľačo neodpustiteľné. Nie, nezabil žiadnu bielu gójsku matku s dieťaťom, za to by ho systém ešte aj pochválil, no on si totižto dovolil napísať svoju vlastnú revizionistickú publikáciu s tématikou druhej svetovej vojny. Revizionistický pohľa

🔥2811👍10

1 Jan 2026, 21:12 UTC672 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @KapitannormalnostPhoto

Znovuzrodenie Denisa Nikitina Zbožné prianie pravoverných nacionalistov sa dnes krátko po poludní stalo skutočnosťou. Denis Nikitin (Kapustin) je napokon nažive a správy o jeho tragickej smrti sa ukázali ako súčasť špeciálnej operácie ukrajinských spravodajských služieb. Tie mu v skutočnosti zachránili život, keďže ruská FSB ho mala v úmysle zlikvidovať. Geniálny Kyrylo Budanov tak predviedol ďalší husársky kúsok, k

11👍4

27 Dec 2025, 20:50 UTC620 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rvc_armyPhoto

Сегодня ночью на Запорожском направлении фронта, во время выполнения боевой задачи героически погиб наш командир - Денис «WhiteRex» Капустин. По предварительным данным - прилет FPV-дрона. Все подробности будут оглашены позже - пока устанавливаются детали произошедшего. Мы обязательно отомстим, Денис. Твое дело живет.

😢193🔥2

14 Dec 2025, 17:58 UTC853 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Povedzme si pravdu, že ak by neboli opäť pri moci od roku 1945, tak by umelo, tak ako je u nich zvykom, nafúkli počet mŕtvol z 12 na 6 miliónov. Už s tým majú nejaké tie skúsenosti. ➡️ T.ME/KANAL_RADOVANANDRASIK

🔥238

29 Aug 2025, 06:40 UTC≈3,060 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥴 SLOVENSKÁ NÁRODNÁ POHROMA 🥴 Pri výročí tohto komunistického, ba, v konečnom dôsledku čisto židovského sviatku, známeho ako tzv. „slovenské národné povstanie”, si mnohí Slováci, nevediac o reálnych partizánskych skutkoch a zločinoch, neodpustia ďakovať za postupné tzv. oslobodzovanie nášho národa od národných socialistov. Vraj vďaka (zlo)činom partizánov v rokoch 1944-1945, sme sa dostali do skupiny víťazných ná

👍4212🔥9👎1

9 May 2025, 20:58 UTC≈2,010 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

FIKTÍVNE OSLOBODENIE VS. REÁLNE OSLOBODENIE Pri príležitosti 80. výročia víťazstva nad fašizmom si odcestoval slovenský premiér do Ruskej federácie, kde sa nechal odfotiť vedľa židoboľševika Vladimíra Putina. Titulok na jeho statuse na sociálnej sieti Facebook niesol názov „Slovensko ďakuje svojim osloboditeľom”. Tak sa na to pozrime. Tzv. oslobodenie 1945-1993 od Červeného moru nieslo známky ignorácie záujmov slov

👍3911🔥4🤬1

8 May 2025, 17:41 UTC≈1,550 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

DEŇ, KEDY EURÓPANIA PREHRALI Je tragikomické, ako mnohé národy oslavujú vlastnú prehru. Nie je to len o prehre Tretej ríše, ale o celej Európe. Každým rokom môžme priamo až zažívať následky tejto prehry. Vraj sme ako Slovensko na strane víťazov a to najmä z toho dôvodu, že 3 percentá vtedajšieho slovenského obyvateľstva spolupracovala s Červeným morom. Ten si nás po druhej svetovej vojne ako jedna z tzv. víťazných

26👍19🔥4

16 Mar 2025, 16:09 UTC≈1,810 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SUVERENITA SLOVENSKÉHO NÁRODA Každoročne by sme 14. marca za normálnych okolností oslavovali veľký počin slovenského národa. Aj za pomoci Adolfa Hitlera, Tretej ríše sme získali suverenitu, po ktorej naši predkovia tak dlho túžili. Žiaľ, opak je dnes realitou a najmä za pomoci pseudohistorikov, preudoaktivistov, ktorých zľahka môžeme označiť ako štetky Weimarskej demokracie, sa tento významný deň po roku 1945 zásad

👍2413🔥3

8 Mar 2025, 21:44 UTC847 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @KapitannormalnostPhoto

♀️ 8. marec je posledných "pár" desaťročí označovaný ako tzv. Medzinárodný deň žien. Poznáte však jeho ideologický pôvod? Prvý "deň žien", ktorý navrhla aktivista židovského pôvodu - Theresa Malkiel, sa konal pod záštitou Socialistickej strany USA dňa 28. februára 1909. ✡️ Následne v auguste 1910 sa v Kodani uskutočnila medzinárodná socialistká konferencia, na ktorej Clara Zetkin (presvedčená marxistka a neskôr čle

👍282🔥1

27 Jan 2025, 10:07 UTC≈1,080 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

MEDZINÁRODNÝ DEŇ ŠTETIEK SYSTÉMU V týchto dňoch máme možnosť bádať najmä v politických kruhoch, kto každý, či už sa jedná o muža alebo ženu, je štetka systému po roku 1945. Veď predsa kult holokauzy nesmie byť zabudnutý! Kiežby si tak tie štetky takto pravidelne spomínali na obete svojich chlebodarcov, ktorí sa skoro 80 rokov pred médiámi - ich nástrojmi manipulácie verejnosti - prezentujú ako tí bití, večne ubližov

👍30🔥53

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kanal_radovanandrasik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TG KANÁL ‡ Radovan ANDRÁŠIK” (@kanal_radovanandrasik), 634 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanal_radovanandrasik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.