Channel
@kapitanspravodajstvo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,457subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001818828588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kapitanspravodajstvo |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kapitanspravodajstvo |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 1,457 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 1,459 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 1,462 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:12 | 1,467 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 1,470 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 1,472 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 1,476 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 1,478 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 1,485 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 1,485 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
518 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 280 | 54.1% | |
| 👍 | 164 | 31.7% | |
| ⚡ | 54 | 10.4% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 3.47% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.386% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇦 | Ukrajinská SBU dnes úspešne zmarila plánovaný atentát na veliteľa Tretieho armádneho zboru Andrija Bileckého. Ruský agent pripravoval bombový útok na brigádneho generála v čase, keď sa pohyboval priamo v bojovej zóne. Zdroj Andrij Bileckij patrí k najvýraznejším postavám modernej ukrajinskej nacionalistickej scény. V minulosti už prežil niekoľko pokusov o likvidáciu; počas jedného z nich ho dokonca zasiahla g…
👍38🫡15⚡2
⚡| Ostré vyjadrenie Denisa Nikitina na adresu (pod)ľudí, ktorí oslavovali jeho fingovanú smrť, zverejnené na X. Vidím, že sa do mojej komentárovej sekcie nahrnula kopa spodiny, aby si honila nad mojou ‚smrťou‘. Banda lúzrov. Tá istá spodina, ktorá jasá nad Putinovou multirasovou hordou. Močím vám na tváre. Ste moje suky. Budem žiť ďalej a pokračovať vo svojom boji len preto, aby som vás urobil ešte nešťastnejšími. 🫵…
🫡44👍14⚡9
⚡| Denis „White Rex“ Nikitin sa prvýkrát od svojej fingovanej smrti ozval prostredníctvom osobných sociálnych sietí. Prepáčte, že som Vám ukradol sviatky. Zvíťazíme! Šťastný nový rok! Kapitán – spravodajstvo
🫡35⚡6
Nové video! https://youtu.be/UhAbhUo3vIM
👍26
Znovuzrodenie Denisa Nikitina Zbožné prianie pravoverných nacionalistov sa dnes krátko po poludní stalo skutočnosťou. Denis Nikitin (Kapustin) je napokon nažive a správy o jeho tragickej smrti sa ukázali ako súčasť špeciálnej operácie ukrajinských spravodajských služieb. Tie mu v skutočnosti zachránili život, keďže ruská FSB ho mala v úmysle zlikvidovať. Geniálny Kyrylo Budanov tak predviedol ďalší husársky kúsok, k…
❤18⚡10👍6
🌞 Dnes sme si v Brne uctili pamiatku Denisa "White Rexa" Kapustina, padlého veliteľa Ruského dobrovoľníckeho zboru. Pietna akcia prebehla bez akýchkoľvek problémov a provokácií, aj keď sa k nám počas plánovania dostalo niekoľko vyhrážok. Ďakujem spoluorganizátorom a všetkým zúčastneným, ktorým nie je ľahostajný osud Európy. Boj pokračuje. RDK vpred! 🇷🇺
🫡36⚡5👍4
🇨🇿 | Dnes, 30. decembra 2025, sa bude v Brne konať pietný akt na počesť padlého veliteľa Ruského dobrovoľníckeho zboru, Denisa Kapustina (Nikitina). Adresa: Hlinky 142b, BRNO Čas: 13:00 Kapitán – spravodajstvo
🫡38👍7⚡2
🇩🇪 | Ani nemeckí nacionalisti sa nenechali zahanbiť a taktiež vytvorili grafity na počesť Denisa Nikitina. Zdroj Kapitán – spravodajstvo
🫡36👍7⚡3
🇨🇵 | Francúzski nacionalisti vytvorili grafity na počesť nedávno zosnulého Denisa Nikitina, ktorý padol v boji na Ukrajine. Zdroj Kapitán – spravodajstvo
🫡37👍11⚡4
Večný Denis "White Rex" Nikitin Stále nemôžem a ani nechcem uveriť, že si navždy preč. Keď som čítal správy o tvojom nečakanom konci, neustále som dúfal, že to nie je pravda. Žiaľ, je. Odštartoval si nesmierne množstvo procesov, no osud rozhodol, že sa ich konečného naplnenia už nedožiješ. Tvoje nespočetné úspechy a zásluhy by bolo možné vymenúvať ešte veľmi dlho. Za jeden z najvýraznejších možno považovať založeni…
🫡39⚡6👍3
🇺🇦 | V ukrajinskom meste Černihiv neznámi aktivisti zničili chanukovú menoru. Zdroj 🕎 K oslavám tohto židovského sviatku sa pár dní predtým negatívne vyjadril aj populárny ukrajinský nacionalistický telegramový kanál Valhöll, ktorý tieto oslavy vníma ako verejné ponižovanie ukrajinského národa. Ukrajinský národ každý deň umiera vo vojne, každú noc počúva ostreľovanie, dvadsaťštyri hodín denne zostáva bez elektriny…
👍48⚡7🔥2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @kapitanspravodajstvo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kapitanspravodajstvo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kapitán - spravodajstvo” (@kapitanspravodajstvo), 1,457 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kapitanspravodajstvo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.