Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Как Туда Попасть

Channel

Как Туда Попасть

@kaktudapopast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

53,010subscribers

-83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001193427231
TypeChannel
Username@kaktudapopast
Created21 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kaktudapopast

Growth

53,01053,09353,051.56 August 2026 — 53,093 subscribers6 August 2026 — 53,086 subscribers7 August 2026 — 53,073 subscribers8 August 2026 — 53,066 subscribers9 August 2026 — 53,063 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53,057 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,052 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,044 subscribers13 August 2026 — 53,038 subscribers14 August 2026 — 53,027 subscribers16 August 2026 — 53,017 subscribers17 August 2026 — 53,010 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,998–53,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:5653,010-7
16 Aug 2026, 05:5953,017-10
14 Aug 2026, 17:3653,027-11
13 Aug 2026, 10:1453,038-6
12 Aug 2026, 13:4653,044-8
11 Aug 2026, 15:0553,052-5
10 Aug 2026, 18:1353,057-6
9 Aug 2026, 15:1253,063-3
8 Aug 2026, 14:5153,066-7
7 Aug 2026, 17:4853,073-13
6 Aug 2026, 20:2053,086-7
6 Aug 2026, 09:4653,093first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 7 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

566 reactions across 3 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26947.5%
🔥19734.8%
👍6611.7%
🍾122.12%
❤‍🔥101.77%
61.06%
👎20.353%
💩20.353%
😁10.177%
😴10.177%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 566reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 23 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 May 2026, 18:25 UTC≈26,600 views159 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Командоры 2026 Этим летом я делаю новую экспедицию на судне «Профессор Хромов» по самому труднодоступному участку тихоокеанского побережья России. За 11 дней с 28 июля по 7 августа мы пройдем от Камчатки через все Командорские острова до Чукотки. Фишка этого маршрута не только в самих Командорах, куда добирались лишь единицы, но еще и в севере Камчатки и юге Чукотки. Стартовав в Петропавловске, мы сначала 2 дня бу

🔥7653🍾12👍86👎1💩1😁1

18 Apr 2026, 19:20 UTC≈12,300 views269 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Трасса на Джилы-Су 📍— Северный Кавказ 🇷🇺 Недавно я писал про самую высокогорную дорогу Сибири в Саянах, а теперь в очередной раз прокатился по самой высокой дороге всей России — трассе от Кисловодска до урочища Джилы-Су, что у подножья Эльбруса. Это уникальная дорога не только потому, что она забралась на головокружительную высоту. Здесь, на отметке 2400 над уровнем моря, еще и идеальный асфальт, по которому вы мож

141🔥79👍38❤‍🔥10💩1

7 Apr 2026, 17:43 UTC≈11,600 views138 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Самый красивый отель Русского Севера Про бутик-отель «Заонежье» я много слышал от знакомых в последнее время, и все отзывы были восторженными. Очень интересно было посмотреть на этот северный люкс вживую. В проекте сошлось сразу несколько жирных плюсов: эталонная природа Русского Севера, которую я очень люблю, классный сервис и внимание к мелочам в дизайне. Очень здорово тут придумали украсить фасад городчатым лем

75🔥42👍20👎1

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @kaktudapopast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 370,152 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Суточно.ру
@sutochnoru · 211,990
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Как Туда Попасть” (@kaktudapopast), 53,010 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kaktudapopast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.