Channel
@k_most
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
74subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002078085179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @k_most |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/k_most |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 74 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 75 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 75 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 54.5% | |
| custom 5361708172983686565 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5377749197229415652 | 1 | 9.09% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 22 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @k_most. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 November 2025 to 22 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, сегодня на моей «ПЕРЕСДАЧЕ» — Елизавета Якушева! Телеведущая, которая пришла в профессию максимально не по диплому. Она окончила МАИ, проходила практику в Роскосмосе, работала в торговле и туризме, и в какой-то момент поняла, что её место по ту сторону камеры. Мы поговорили о резкой смене деятельности, о том, как решиться начать все с нуля и почему диплом ≠ профессия. Новый выпуск уже на YouTube! https://y…
понял, что мало рассказываю о работе, проектах.. хотите, чтобы показывал внутрянку? Что делаем, какие цифры а то мне кажется у многих нет представления, чем я занимаюсь
Делаю?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
По показателям кстати один из самых топовых роликов. Стартовая динамика очень хорошая, текущий CTR 8,5% (Для тех, кто в танке, это соотношение показов и кликов, то есть сколько человек увидели ролик в ленте и сколько кликнуло), будем внедрять A/B тест с новыми обложками и названиями и смотреть
Эксклюзивно покажу трейлер, чтобы вы поняли, о чем я говорю… Это просто кино, реально.. Я уже после просмотра заставки пылаю от эмоций, а просмотр выпуска до конца это х100 Знаете же эту тему, когда выходишь после кайфового фильма и ощущаешь себя в другой реальности? Будто бы ты стал частью этого, такая легкость внутри Вот после влога та же история, ты становишься частью мира топ 1% и больше не сможешь жить с пре…
Video, posted without a caption
Чем занят сегодня весь СНГ? Смотрит новый влог на канале Ромы Семянникова Если вы это еще не сделали, то вы не живете в реальности.. Этот влог - это пример той свободы, которая может быть и у вас, это кладезь мыслей о повседневности, переняв которые, вы начнете реально жить в этом мире, без апатии, бедности и выгорания Эксклюзивом является интервью с мамой, где она рассказала, как видела его путь она. Идеальный п…
Скам схема не прокатила🤣 Теперь можете
В демо версии 40 минут материала..лютое мясо (и это 50%, что оставили, остальное пойдет на рилсы) Показали все стороны, крутые мысли, лайфстайл Пересматриваю и кайфую, целый фильм 30 реакций и покажу небольшую демку..либо 50 звезд.. Добавил бы нули справа, так как это супер эксклюзив Дружите со мной, покупайте консалитнг и будете подобное видеть раньше, чем кто-либо
🔥3
Не думаю, что СНГ рынок готов к этому влогу…величайший уровень Ни один..ни один эксперт не делает подобного, потому что такого же уровня людей просто нет🤣 Уровень интереса и вовлечения в проект - как себе делаю. Когда объединяются люди, с unbelievable view на этот мир, получается ohuiebl Влог не в привычном понимании большинства, не просто нарезка из жизни чужого человека. При просмотре вы буквально проживете этот…
🔥1
Товарищи, мой следующий герой — телеведущий/ая федерального канала 🤫 На какой вопрос вы бы хотели получить ответ? Пишите свои варианты в комментариях.
Всем привет! Моя подруга Луиза запустила нереальное шоу «ПЕРЕСДАЧА» на ютубе. В первом пилотном выпуске она жестко наказала препода МГУ за тех, кто мучался на пересдачах… удалось ли ей добиться свой цели или теперь ее отчислят из престижного университета за столь провакационное видео? Смотрите в выпуске
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @k_most. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делаю?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 22 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кирилл Мостовой” (@k_most), 74 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k_most.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.