Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рома Семянников

Channel

Рома Семянников

@Semyannikov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,107subscribers

+368 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001160118837
TypeChannel
Username@Semyannikov
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Semyannikov

Growth

13,73914,10713,9236 August 2026 — 13,739 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,765 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,858 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,930 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,956 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,984 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,016 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,046 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,060 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,107 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net +368. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,684–14,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:2314,107+47
14 Aug 2026, 14:3714,060+14
13 Aug 2026, 03:3514,046+30
12 Aug 2026, 01:1214,016+32
11 Aug 2026, 01:3113,984+28
9 Aug 2026, 23:3213,956+26
9 Aug 2026, 00:5513,930+72
7 Aug 2026, 22:3613,858+93
6 Aug 2026, 21:2313,765+26
6 Aug 2026, 15:0313,739first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.9%
avg views ÷ 14,107 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,600
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 June 202613 August 2026)
Views total75,980
Reactions total5,103
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,030 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,58745.7%
🔥1,80218.0%
🏆1,36713.6%
👍9979.94%
🙏4454.44%
🐳2622.61%
custom 53167314257838390492062.05%
🤝1581.58%
custom 5316679430909732521970.967%
😭610.608%
😁220.219%
🤯190.189%
🌚70.07%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,030reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,542
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 20 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
1,140
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Semyannikov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈3,450 views690 reactions6 Starsread 15 August 2026

через неделю буду в Нью-Йорке. сами знаете у кого на съемках🎁 дайте реакций, если надо показывать что там да как пройдет, внутрянку и тд

🔥391168👍112🐳12🙏4🏆3

11 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈4,030 views405 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

192🔥128custom 531673142578383904974🤯9🤝1😁1

10 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈6,660 views596 reactions69 Starsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Записал вам честные выводы про заработок денег спустя 17млн$ выручки. Получилось мясо) Давно таких аудио не делал) С вас реакция и комментарий. Приятного прослушивания🤜🤛

🏆278162🔥127👍14custom 531673142578383904910🤯3😁2

7 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈9,830 views768 reactions11 Starsread 15 August 2026

Я расстроен, друзья. Сижу в тильте Возможно удалю этот пост через время. Чувствую, будто буксую на месте или же местами играю в чужую игру У меня раньше было такое чувство, когда все делали маленькие запуски, жили непонятной жизнью, и я понимал, что если не изменю траекторию срочняком - буду жить так же. Базовый уровень нормы, развлекушки, и отсутствие возможности жить по-настоящему крутую жизнь. Меня эта перспекти

🙏401🐳139custom 531673142578383904911789👍13custom 53166794309097325219

5 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC≈8,460 views335 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Как я доволен, что мы это выпустили! В СНГ такого никто не делал. Вышли дебаты на моем ютубе На этот ролик ушло более 300тыс руб, десятки часов работы команды, и наконец-то оно здесь🪩 Спорили насчет того, возможно ли заработать в молодом возрасте, о важности высшего образования, и так далее Ссылка тут: клик клик клик Кто посмотрел, как вам? Дайте знать👇

190🔥73👍53🏆12custom 53167314257838390495🌚1🐳1

4 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC≈7,800 views414 reactions33 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите на записи из моего дневника. Сколько боли и отчаяния в нем. За ним стояли дни и месяцы негативных мыслей, неудачных попыток заработать Когда меня переполняло отчаяние, я не знал, куда деваться. Голова аж болела от накопленной грусти. Найти выход этому всему я не мог, и негативных мыслей становилось только больше. Меньше энергии, сил, и хотелось куда-то от этого сбежать. Поэтому я без остановки играл в ком

238👍88🏆70🔥17🤝1

31 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC≈8,260 views505 reactions11 Starsread 15 August 2026

Нормально так прибавляется тут людей! Открываю каждого и вижу, насколько интересные, осознанные ребятки подписываются 😎 Рад! Многие, кто однажды зашел, остаются на долгий период. И у этого есть причина… которую я сам не знаю😯 надеюсь, что вы поймете и расскажете. Настрой на наше общение исключительно долгосрочный Тут действует одно правило - активничать, ставить реакции, при желании писать комменты. Кто не соблюдае

273🏆116🤝87custom 531667943090973252115😁14

29 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC≈8,310 views629 reactions10 Starsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

332🔥165👍104🏆20🤯4custom 53166794309097325214

25 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈8,880 views369 reactions51 Starsread 15 August 2026

Обидно было тратить столько, но что поделать. На это видео ушло 330к рублей, 4к дол. И это болезненно🥴 Несмотря на то, что я могу себе это позволить, и в рамках дохода это не является огромной суммой, все-таки я привык беречь и уважать деньги. Мы с ними в прекрасных отношениях Существенная часть дохода уходит в накопления или инвест, второй по величине расход - это лайфкост, третий - обучения. За последнее время з

212🔥92👍55🏆7🤝2🙏1

18 Jul 2026, 14:20 UTC≈10,300 views392 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

179👍97🔥90custom 531667943090973252123😁3

16 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC≈10,900 views506 reactions164 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Можете поздравить, я сделал крутейшую покупку😎 Автограф Трампа на его же книге! С двумя верификационными листами, которые подтверждают подлинность В первую поездку в Штаты я был близок к тому, чтобы случайно встретить, но проглядел Потом у меня был инвайт к нему на ужин, но служба безопасности меня отклонила Я подумал, что так или иначе хочу его автограф. Так что надеюсь, это будет такое первое касание, а потом г

283🔥126👍68🏆17custom 531667943090973252112

13 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC≈11,900 views725 reactions60 Starsread 15 August 2026

Сейчас будет неприятно, но это правда. Без результатов ты никому не нужен. Каким бы интересным и разносторонним собеседником ты ни был - если у тебя нет цифр и регалий за твоей спиной, людям будет на тебя все равно Сначала люди встречают по одежке, и это человеческая природа. Мне самому было это неприятно осознавать, но такова жизнь. На первом месте достижения и регалии, потом все остальное 📌Кто ты? Чем занимаешься

383🏆188👍116🔥28custom 53166794309097325217🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Semyannikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 259,331 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 262,997
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 181,031
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рома Семянников” (@Semyannikov), 14,107 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Semyannikov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.