Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

K2 Affiliates

@k2aff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

958subscribers

+22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002481708728
TypeChannel
Username@k2aff
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/k2aff

Growth

9369589476 August 2026 — 936 subscribers6 August 2026 — 941 subscribers6 August 2026 — 941 subscribers13 August 2026 — 958 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 933–961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:34958+17
6 Aug 2026, 13:50941no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:22941+5
6 Aug 2026, 04:18936first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.2%
avg views ÷ 958 subscribers
Avg views / post
864
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (12 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,457
Reactions total153
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

545 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁16329.9%
👍12022.0%
🔥11721.5%
8916.3%
💯325.87%
🥱81.47%
👌50.917%
🫡30.55%
20.367%
😢20.367%
🤣20.367%
👨‍💻10.183%
🤔10.183%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 545reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC581 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В деяких гео Гугл вже почав клоачити урли в видачі, щоб пацанам з навайбкоженними трекерами позицій чуть було веселіше))

😁16👌3😢1

17 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC≈1,100 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Обхід вектора релевантності в RankBrain Google наче маэ бачити опечатку і розуміти, що це те саме, що й правильний ключ. Так, за це відповідає RankBrain та BERT за допомогою embeddings. Вони бачать, що casinno знаходиться в тому ж смисловому кластері, що й casino. І ось тут криється головна пастка. Коли реальна людина робить випадкову опечатку, вона: • Або погоджується на підказку Гугла "Можливо, ви мали на увазі..

27👍15🔥8🤔1😢1

17 Jul 2026, 19:32 UTC901 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вітаю, шановна SEO шляхта. Хочу поділитися кейсом і своїми думками щодо нещодавнього вильоту кількох наших великих та не дуже проектів. Почну з невеликої передісторії. Падіння кожного проєкту було моментальним (в один день), але відбувалося це не одночасно, а по черзі - сайт за сайтом протягом кількох місяців. Наші кнопкодавки стабільно стояли в Топ-1-3 за жирними ключами й отримували довгий час по стабільно кліків н

👍2210🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC875 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Приблизно так наш сайт намагається пробитися в топ повз dmca конкурентів

😁41🔥5

29 May 2026, 18:51 UTC≈1,860 views55 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Більшість сеошників не дуже полюбляють робити ресерчі і тестувати гіпотези. Я саме маю на увазі реальні скрупульозні ресерчі, ціль яких - знайти аномалію, розкласти на молекули, що і як зробили конкуренти, і спробувати відтворити це в тестах та отримати повторювані результати. Працює… поки працює. Час від часу полюбляю почитувати різні книжки на цю тему і дуже раджу хоча б стисло прочитати / подивитися на ютубчику о

👍41🔥85👨‍💻1

21 May 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,600 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

добре що все вилетіло, не треба хвилюватися ні про що😁. Доречі вже давно помітно наближення апа, коли в видачі з'являються ютуб відео в великій кількості, дори, аутріч пости та випічка - це сигнал.

💯22😁13

19 May 2026, 18:28 UTC≈1,550 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Можете повертати бронь вілл в Монако. Поки гуглоїди роспинаються на Google IO, дропчики знову активно з'являються в видачі. tld3 майже не видно, але інші методи працюють. ✊

😁25🫡3👌21

15 May 2026, 06:45 UTC≈1,670 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В видачі Гугл спостерігається реальна суєта🤔. По багатьом ГЕО там де раніше стояли всім відомі схемки, в топі зараз паразитрака Фініків + всякі старі сайти типу casino,org та інші +- крупні мультимовні проекти, а там де видачу не можна закрити цима двома типами сайтів - старі спамні емдшники. На перший вигляд гугл якраз підркрутив схему з хрефами/каноніклами. Помітно менше стало всяких емдшників під всякі ультра НЧ

👍9😁4💯3

13 May 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,350 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Що відрізняє топового сеошника, який показує стабільний результат незалежно від змін алгоритмів, від вуду-практика, котрий роками переповідає один кейс про те, як на годину залетів у топ по ключу "1 cent bonus 100k free spins without registration Zimbabwe"? Для багатьох SEO - це карго-культ. Сеошники "будують" EEAT і Social Fortress у надії, що прилетить Googlebot і поставить їх у топ-1, не розуміючи, що цю концепці

👍15😁6🔥5🤣2

10 May 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,760 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026

SEO Куколд звичайний Колись на каналі Чешем Эго, був цікавий пост про джуна класичного. Вирішив чуть поділитися своїм досвідом. Кожен тиждень проводжу по декілька співбесід сеошників і з сумом спостерігаю одну і ту ж картину - 90% спеців (мова про senior/TL здебільшого) на ринку поняття не мають, що зараз відбувається у видачі або просто пасивно спостерігають, як конкуренти обходять їх сайти , але мають міліон прич

30👍11🥱8💯7

30 Apr 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,200 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Це уже виходить фанфік якийсь. На домені https://proessayhelp.co.uk/, який раніше був эссейкою під ЮК, розвернули казино контент. Цікаво, що на кизино доменах будуть підіймати наші нащадки?

😁162

4 Apr 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,460 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Головний висновок Не йдіть проти видачі. Якщо зараз топ живе на дропах і каноніклах, а ви плануєте запускати білий брендовий рев'юшник - розчарування прийде швидко. Це може бути частиною довгострокової стратегії, але тільки якщо ви точно знаєте що робите і стратегія збалансована.

🔥162

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @k2aff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 312,590 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“K2 Affiliates” (@k2aff), 958 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/k2aff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.