Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

89.jpeg 📸

@jpeg_89

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

263subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001381131576
TypeChannel
Username@jpeg_89
Description#ВОСЕМЬДЕСЯТДЕВЯТЫЙ 🌏 | Мир моими глазами! 🎮 | Mavic 2 Pro 📷 | Sony A7 IV vk.com/jpeg_89 instagram.com/89.jpeg
Created16 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jpeg_89

Growth

2637 Aug 2026, 19:52 — 263 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:04 — 263 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:528 Aug 2026, 09:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 262–264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:04263no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:52263first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 11 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
524
Videos
21
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
1m 36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6334.2%
5932.1%
👍3720.1%
❤‍🔥105.43%
😍84.35%
💯63.26%
🤩10.543%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2024 to 1 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2024, 15:27 UTC649 views53 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MustgoYamalPhoto

Оставим здесь немного летнего походного вайба

22🔥16👍15

18 Aug 2024, 15:26 UTC654 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MustgoYamalVideo

Озеро Большое Щучье это целый список самого самого, итак загибаем пальцы: Самое большое на Полярном Урале Самое глубокое Самое труднодоступное Топ один по запасам пресной воды на всем Урале И, возможно, именно там ты найдешь самые красивые виды Мы пытались туда попасть два с половиной года, и даже эта поездка была очень близка к тому что бы сорваться, но все это того стоило. Стоило и резко менять все планы за 3 часа

13👍13🔥12❤‍🔥1

25 May 2024, 18:12 UTC616 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MustgoYamalPhoto

Если вы хотя бы раз слышали об Алтае, то, наверное, это были слова вроде потрясающий, живописный, место силы. Край гор, рек, водопадов и удивительной природы. И, если вы любите путешествия, то Алтай - это именно то место, куда вам срочно, вот прям сейчас, нужно взять билеты и лететь, ехать и торопиться посетить этот уникальный регион. Мы провели 8 дней на Алтае, и постарались добраться до каждого интересного места.

🔥1710👍9😍1

14 Apr 2024, 15:24 UTC600 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MustgoYamalPhoto

❄️ Пока за окном ещё летают снежинки, и утром нас встречает не пение птиц, а звук автозапусков и вебаст, мы решили смахнуть пыль с архивов и подарить усладу для ваших уставших от зимы глазок. ‼️ ОСТОРОЖНО это видео вызывает непреодолимую жажду лета! 💭 А кто в комментариях сможет перечислить все локации из видео, тот молодец. 📺 Смотреть на YouTube 💙 Смотреть в VK

❤‍🔥96💯6🔥2

11 Apr 2024, 04:35 UTC630 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❄️ День оленевода. Детали

🔥168😍7🤩1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @jpeg_89. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 989,620 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“89.jpeg 📸” (@jpeg_89), 263 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpeg_89.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.