27 measurements spanning 31 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,626–55,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 09:20
55,711
-11
4 Sept 2026, 15:16
55,722
-15
3 Sept 2026, 00:06
55,737
-13
1 Sept 2026, 22:37
55,750
-22
31 Aug 2026, 19:15
55,772
-36
30 Aug 2026, 22:05
55,808
+20
29 Aug 2026, 19:25
55,788
+23
28 Aug 2026, 22:24
55,765
-14
28 Aug 2026, 01:53
55,779
-15
27 Aug 2026, 01:58
55,794
-15
26 Aug 2026, 02:24
55,809
+5
25 Aug 2026, 02:55
55,804
+21
23 Aug 2026, 21:05
55,783
-14
21 Aug 2026, 00:54
55,797
+21
19 Aug 2026, 23:13
55,776
+78
18 Aug 2026, 23:52
55,698
+48
17 Aug 2026, 23:02
55,650
-6
16 Aug 2026, 20:17
55,656
-21
15 Aug 2026, 11:45
55,677
-11
14 Aug 2026, 03:26
55,688
first reading
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.84%
avg views ÷ 55,711 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,250
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.995%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
53 (31 July 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
152,840
Reactions total
1,521
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,970
Videos
≈96
Links
≈676
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,791 reactions across 53 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
596
33.3%
❤
457
25.5%
custom 5451806712723947920
169
9.44%
😁
122
6.81%
🍾
90
5.03%
😍
77
4.30%
👏
66
3.69%
💯
64
3.57%
👍
55
3.07%
🦄
31
1.73%
😱
12
0.67%
🎉
10
0.558%
🏆
9
0.503%
🐳
9
0.503%
😎
9
0.503%
⚡
5
0.279%
🙏
5
0.279%
🤔
5
0.279%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
47
of 53 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bomj_tour_trip. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Осенне-зимний сезон 2026!
Хотя с приходом осени кажется, что год подходит к завершению, впереди ещё целых 4 месяца, которые ты можешь сделать лучшими в жизни или хотя бы, в этом году!
Многие направления осенью раскрываются с особой харизмой, ведь мы всегда подбираем даты заездов так, чтобы твой отпуск попал на идеальный сезон. А в декабре есть возможность потусить в трипчике как до НГ, чтобы вернуться отдохнувшим и…
Мы ни на что не намекаем…
…а прямо говорим, что Маврикий — это наш личный ТОП для люксового отдыха в стиле олдмани. Это не кричащий кич, который пестрит во всех соцсетях, а самый настоящий нишевый отдых с элегантной роскошью.
Открой полную программку, чтобы посмотреть подробности.
Этот остров живой и дышащий, от него пахнет свежестью джунглей и солью океана, а архитектура вобрала традиции креольского стиля, францу…
Новый Год в новом месте!
С новыми людьми, с новыми яркими эмоциями и новой страничкой жизни. Вот твой идеальный НГ — он какой? Давай загибать пальчики:
1. С кайфовой программой, музыкой и отвальными танцами
2. С людьми, которые умеют веселиться, тусить, а когда надо и по душам поговорить
3. В красивом месте, где ты не веришь сам себе, что отмечаешь именно тут
4. С оливьешечкой и цитатами из “Иронии судьбы” или сумас…
Полярный опыт в паре часов полёта от Москвы?
Скорее всего ты просто не задумывался, насколько просто и близко можно погрузиться в совершенно другой мир, где киты плещутся в Баренцевом море, небо озаряется Северным сиянием, олени жуют ягель, а вокруг бесконечная тундра.
Это наше путешествие в Териберку! Смотри программку здесь.
Кольский полуостров ближе, чем кажется, как и этот дикий уникальный опыт, который он дар…
План или спонтанность? Выбор за тобой!
Сейчас ты можешь запланировать поездку на Сокотру на следующий год и таять в сладком ожидании или выбрать любую дату 2026, хитро улыбнуться своей смелости и рвануть на самый красивый остров Йемена. Мы поддержим любую твою затею в моменте или перспективе!
Сокотра — это бесконечное звёздное небо, дикие места, не тронутые человеком, эндемичные бутылочные и драконовые деревья, жиз…
🔥9❤7🍾2🐳2😍2custom 54518067127239479202💯1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @bomj_tour_trip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
На Своих Двоих🎒 @getaroundrussia · 34,368 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БомжTourTrip | авторские путешествия” (@bomj_tour_trip), 55,711 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bomj_tour_trip.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
