Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MadKolobock

Channel

MadKolobock

@MadKolobock_Inferno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

844subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002036156420
TypeChannel
Username@MadKolobock_Inferno
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MadKolobock_Inferno

Growth

84411 Aug 2026, 11:17 — 844 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:42 — 844 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:1711 Aug 2026, 22:42
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 843–845 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:42844no change
11 Aug 2026, 11:17844first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 844 subscribers
Avg views / post
281
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total562
Reactions total80
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

814 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 541110847021046931835643.7%
custom 541140660536531760930938.0%
custom 5231241660830093751566.88%
custom 5411599767224491744435.28%
custom 5411514147051444552374.55%
custom 5411602554658264396131.60%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 814reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MadKolobock_Inferno. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC241 views39 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Наконец-то еду домой

custom 541110847021046931830custom 54114066053653176098custom 54115141470514445521

2 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC321 views41 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вы не поверите насколько это реалистичный дудл. Разве что Джо не был таким коварным как я его изобразил

custom 541140660536531760932custom 54111084702104693184custom 54115141470514445523custom 52312416608300937511custom 54115997672244917441

9 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC477 views36 reactionsread 11 August 2026

я живая, кста

custom 541110847021046931829custom 54116025546582643965custom 54114066053653176091custom 54115141470514445521

9 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC640 views29 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @canon_otp1994Photo

ШОК! ВСЁ ЭТО ВРЕМЯ В ПАПКЕ ДОКА БЫЛ... ЖЕНОДОКИЮЛЬ! Да, мы снова здесь! Очередной женодокиюль, очередной список тем. Вновь коротко напомним основные положения: 👍 Женодокиюль — это челлендж по пейрингу Док/Жена Дока из мультсериала «БЕСИТ!». 👍 Есть список из семи тем, по которым вы в течение июля делаете работы, связанные с женодоком. 👍 Выполнять темы можно как по указанному в списке порядку, так и произвольно. 👍Ин

custom 541110847021046931822custom 54114066053653176093custom 54116025546582643963custom 54115141470514445521

20 Jun 2026, 06:22 UTC585 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @joemiraPhoto

https://youtu.be/ZDugLoR5B5Q В новом видео мы вернемся к старому формату "Джо говорит обо всем подряд" и попробуем под общим углом посмотреть на такие события, как блокировка Telegram и замедление Ютуба в России, бомбардировки Ирана, религиозность политиков, красные линии с центрами принятия решений, безумства законодательства и курьезы РКН, а также бесконечное терпение русского народа. Короче, че за фигню я тут не

custom 541140660536531760917custom 54111084702104693183custom 54115141470514445521custom 54116025546582643961

19 Jun 2026, 22:19 UTC≈2,950 views69 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

"Нарисуй своих любимых персонажей как твоих личных рабов."

custom 541140660536531760951custom 541110847021046931811custom 52312416608300937515custom 54115141470514445522

14 Jun 2026, 14:57 UTC754 views54 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Пачка пустынных котиков

custom 541110847021046931849custom 54115141470514445523custom 54114066053653176092

11 Jun 2026, 00:03 UTC919 views54 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Остальным я отдаю низкий поклон. Спасибо вам огромное за поддержку. Её я пока не закрываю, но сосредоточусь в ближайшее время на контенте, чтобы не простаивать канал и группу. Деньги пойдут на лечение и лекарства. Очень надеюсь, что мне станет лучше в ближайшие полгода (в лучшем случае, но если это произойдет раньше — это будет, конечно, чудо.) Спасибо вам ❤️‍🔥

custom 541110847021046931836custom 541140660536531760914custom 54115141470514445523custom 52312416608300937511

10 Jun 2026, 23:52 UTC720 views49 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Пока я жду, когда уже надо ехать на первый сеанс, интересует важный вопрос... Нафига ты (он знает, на кого я указываю) ставишь смеющегося Эдика??? Я для кого Юру в клоуна нарядила? Чтобы он один сидел и пил от осознания одиночества??? 🤡

custom 541159976722449174439custom 54115141470514445527custom 52312416608300937513

9 Jun 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,630 views64 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Я наверно хочу высказаться. Вы наверно видели очень много раз в моём творческом пути, что я с огромным рвением что-то начинаю и потом (зачастую, очень быстро) это забрасываю без каких-либо комментариев или объяснений, даже если штука потенциально хорошая. Я осознаю это и мне это нисколько не нравится. И я на данный момент с этим ничего не могу сделать. Даже после того, как я уехала из родительского (не самого комф

custom 541110847021046931847custom 54114066053653176099custom 52312416608300937516custom 54115141470514445522

8 Jun 2026, 20:49 UTC520 views40 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Любимый класс

custom 541110847021046931838custom 54114066053653176091custom 54115141470514445521

8 Jun 2026, 18:02 UTC609 views42 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Новый мерч???? 👀

custom 541140660536531760937custom 54111084702104693184custom 54115141470514445521

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MadKolobock_Inferno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,215,462 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MadKolobock” (@MadKolobock_Inferno), 844 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MadKolobock_Inferno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.