4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,367–2,373 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 14:28
2,368
-3
9 Aug 2026, 21:52
2,371
-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:17
2,372
no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:09
2,372
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.0%
avg views ÷ 2,368 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (24 May 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
6,968
Reactions total
258
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
588 reactions across 18 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
128
21.8%
👍
123
20.9%
🔥
104
17.7%
🙏
75
12.8%
🥰
29
4.93%
😁
19
3.23%
😭
14
2.38%
🤡
12
2.04%
🤯
12
2.04%
👻
9
1.53%
🕊
8
1.36%
😨
8
1.36%
💯
7
1.19%
👎
5
0.85%
😢
5
0.85%
😱
5
0.85%
🤔
5
0.85%
🌭
4
0.68%
👏
4
0.68%
❤🔥
3
0.51%
5 further kinds
9
1.53%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 588reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем привет, у меня случилась травма - перелом левого запястья 🤳со смещением - так что ближайшие 5-8 недель я однорукий Джо) соответственно работать на компе получается заметно медленнее, так как во-первых, я привык делать это двумя руками, а во-вторых некоторые вещи (например при рисовании карт) я вообще пока не понимаю как делать одной рукой. Так что если вы от меня что-то ждёте, возможно придётся подождать чуть до…
The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Лингвисты выбрали самое красивое слово в мире. Сможете выговорить с первого раза?
Специалисты платформы для изучения языков Babbel впервые провели конкурс на самое красивое слово в мире. Они собрали 223 варианта из более чем 75 языков, а международное жюри оценило их звучание, смысл, редкость и культурную значимость.
Победителем стало слово “кайтиакитанга” (kaitiakitanga) из языка маори – коренного народа Новой Зе…
Для меня загадка, каким образом и зачем СМИ каждый раз раздувают «лингвистические сенсации». То внезапно «горячее кофе разрешили», то ударение в йогурте «перенесли на второй слог», то «узаконили звОнит».
На этот раз сенсационным стал глагол МАХАТЬ. Оказывается, теперь «В России глагол “махаю” признали литературной нормой» – именно так, ни больше ни меньше😁
Коллеги-лингвисты уже исчерпывающе высказались о «махаю-гей…
Звук [j] (й, йот) в русском языке может передаваться как минимум 4 способами: й, йотированные гласные, ь и ъ.
Рассмотрим их по позициям:
● Vj#, VjC (между гласной и концом слова/согласной) – с помощью й: войн, мой
● #jV (перед гласной в начале слова) – специальными йотированными гласными (фактически слоговыми знаками для слогов j + гласная), в иностранных словах может также быть йе и йо (йети, йод)
● VjV (между глас…
Кстати, если кому нравится смотреть в 🌿 природе на 🦜птиц и он каждый раз думает: "Хм, это лунь там парит или 🦅канюк", или вообще паче чаяния бёрд-вотчит вовсю, то есть классный канал Ивана Калабушева, которому (Ивану) всего 15 лет, но 📸 съёмки такие, что хоть сейчас в National Geographic.
Заодно, он показывает процесс съёмки, рассказывает 🪶как снимать, ведёт 📝дневники наблюдений, в общем, вот это всё! 💜
Думаю, многим из вас знаком предмет на картинке 👆. Это небольшой прямоугольник, вырезанный из пенки и крепящейся на попе резинкой. Используется (например, в 🏕 походах) как сиденье при сидении на холодной почве / брёвнах / камнях.
Интересен он тем, что в русском языке для него существует более 20 разных названий и как будто нельзя сказать, что какое-то из них основное. Некоторые слова либо имеют также значение «турис…
В 1944 часть цезских селений в приказном порядке была переселена в Чечню, на место выселенных чеченцев. После возвращения последних, в 1958 г., некоторые из них вернулись обратно в горы, часть переселились на север Дагестана, как говорят здесь, «на плоскость». Они основали селения:
● гунзибцы — Стальское, Комсомольское и Шушановка в Кизилюртовском р-не
● хваршинцы — Октябрьское, Первомайское, Муцалаул в Хасавюртовск…
👍22🔥9❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jirzik_jirzik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
куда вы поставите ударение в единственном и множественном числах слова ВСПОЛОХ
всполОх, всполОхи6%
вспОлох, вспОлохи82%
всполОх, вспОлохи4%
вспОлох, всполОхи3%
ой, совсем не знаю 🤷♀️2%
я говорю это слово, пусть и редко20%
никогда не говорю 🙊21%
иное💃0%
The shares total 138%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 552,618 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Коряков, Юрий Борисович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…{{примечания}}
== Ссылки ==
{{Навигация}}
* Научно-популярный [https://t.me/jirzik_jirzik телеграм-канал Jirzik]
* [http://www.pravmir…” read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jirzik” (@jirzik_jirzik), 2,368 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jirzik_jirzik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
