Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

灰产社区丨今日大事丨灰产大事儿 永久ID @Dashier

@jinridashi

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002296820849
TypeChannel
Usernames@Dashier @jinridashi
Created9 October 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jinridashi

Growth

232423.510 Aug 2026, 22:46 — 24 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:18 — 24 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 02:52 — 23 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 22:4612 Aug 2026, 02:52
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–24 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:5223-1
11 Aug 2026, 11:1824no change
10 Aug 2026, 22:4624first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 9 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2024 to 16 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2024, 10:00 UTC199 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

“神啊!谁来救救我们?”缅北腊戌又遭轰炸,1死1伤 缅媒报道,10月14日傍晚6点30分左右,腊戌市腊戌-昔卜公路,腊戌城外纳玛扩客运站附近遭军方战机轰炸,造成1人死亡1人受伤。 据称,军方战机投掷了3枚炸弹,造成1名骑乘摩托车民众死亡。 10月14日零点多,腊戌-南渡之间腊戌出口的伊奈村也曾遭军方战机投掷500磅航空炸弹轰炸,造成了3名民众死亡,2人受伤。

16 Oct 2024, 10:00 UTC272 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

42人被捕!泰国尖竹汶府警方突击检查非法赌博窝点! 据泰媒报道,10月14日下午5点,在尖竹汶府县长Kittipong Kittikun的指挥下,尖竹汶府警察局长Sek San Sri Phet上校与尖竹汶府政府第11边境巡逻警察司合作,在尖竹汶府县Phlap Phla区6村的一栋商业大楼内,逮捕了42名涉嫌非法赌博(Pok Chim)的嫌疑人。 此前当地居民举报称,该建筑被用于非法赌博,从下午到晚上,有很多人出入。 警员将所有嫌疑人带到尖竹汶里市警察局的调查人员那里,采取进一步的法律行动。

11 Oct 2024, 15:20 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

财富金钥匙 @Jinyaoshi (大群) 金钥匙社区 禁发色情/药物/枪支/血腥 广告只能挂名字,刷会被踢 管理 逍遥哥 @xiaoyaoge X站: @Xzhan 料库: @Liaoku 百态: @Baitai 外讯: @Waixun 说币: @Shuobi 号行: @Haohang 大事儿: @Dashier 频道库: @Pindaoku 收藏版: @Shoucangban 云数据: @Yunshuju 千眼查: @Qianyancha 世界体育: @Shijietiyu

1

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @jinridashi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,114,919 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“灰产社区丨今日大事丨灰产大事儿 永久ID @Dashier” (@jinridashi), 23 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinridashi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.