Channel
@haohang
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002452726040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @ergongzi @fugongzi @haohang |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/haohang |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 35 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:00 | 36 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 35 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 38 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 38 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (13 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
出 NFT （咨询不用钱哈） @hanshao 韩少 600u @pangshu 胖叔 1200u @dongzhuo 董卓 1000u @lianzhang 连长 800u @jiekexun 杰克逊 700u @dizaozhe 缔造者 600u @daitouren 带头人 800u @guyongzhe 孤勇者 800u @badaoge 霸道哥 1000u @chubawang 楚霸王 700u @zhiduoxing 智多星 500u @canmouzhang 参谋长 500u
出 NFT （咨询不用钱哈） 🔥 TG助理 永久ID @TGzhuli 📋 做任务平台 | 派单机器人 @paidan 特价 🔑 财富金钥匙，开启财富之门 @jinyaoshi 特价
出 NFT （色频NFT） 🔥福利导航 X站 永久ID @Xzhan 📹 经典视频记录仪，记录精彩瞬间 @jiluyi 特价 🎬 | 片站 = 你的影视资源站 @pianzhan 特价
出 NFT （咨询不用钱哈） 🎁 头奖 @toujiang |特价 🧧 红包连连发 @Lianlianfa 特价 🥚 世界杯砸个金蛋 @zajindan 特价
https://fragment.com/ 用户名使用教程 分享完成之后在飞机-设置-用户名显示
感兴趣联系： @Pangshu（胖叔） 昵称可以重复，用户名却是唯一的联系方式，一个好的用户名一眼就能被记住，更有助于你的业务发展。
出NFT 😎 霸道哥， @badaoge 特价1000u 🏹 楚霸王，霸气外露 @chubawang 特价700u 📊 参谋长，出谋划策 @canmouzhang 特价500u
出NFT 🎁 @toujiang | 头奖 特价5000u 出NFT 📋 @paidan 做任务平台 | 派单机器人 特价2000u
出NFT 福利导航 X站 永久ID @Xzhan 出NFT 人生百态🔥热门吃瓜 永久ID @Baitai（百态）
⚡️ 快开 @kuaikai 特价 🌟 新机遇 @xinjiyu 特价
🎁 @toujiang | 头奖 特价 🎴 @zhuopai 桌牌游戏 特价
🔬 数据精筛 @Jingshai 特价 🧧 红包连连发 @Lianlianfa 特价
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @haohang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 199,354 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中文用户名丨用户名交易 就在号行 永久ID @Haohang” (@haohang), 35 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/haohang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.