Женя фермер pinned «Ссылки на соц сети Я есть в разных социальных сетях, на данный момент ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Макс https://max.ru/jenya_fermer1 ВКонтакте https://vk.com/jenya_fermer1 Запрещенный инст (а может кому актуально) https://www.instagram.com/jenya_fermer Ну и тут в телеграмм.…»

Channel
Женя фермер
@jenya_fermer
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,028subscribers
-565 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001422731542 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jenya_fermer |
| Description | Регистрация в РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673cbcf3b7aeb106ce06f2a9®istryType=bloggersPermission Со мной не похудеешь- готовлю много и вкусно. Ферма и жизнь в деревне. Стройка от А до Я По сотрудничеству@pr_jenya_fermer |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jenya_fermer |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:46 | 33,028 | -33 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 02:58 | 33,061 | -35 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 33,096 | -65 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 33,161 | -68 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 33,229 | -26 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 33,255 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 33,263 | -23 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 33,286 | -19 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 33,305 | -31 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 33,336 | -28 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 33,364 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 33,372 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:53 | 33,377 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 33,383 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 33,392 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 33,396 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 33,407 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 33,415 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 33,431 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 33,437 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,290
- Videos
- ≈15,500
- Links
- ≈145
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 57s
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
468 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 248 | 53.0% | |
| ❤ | 152 | 32.5% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 7.69% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 3.85% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.28% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 1.07% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.427% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.214% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Продолжим . После рынка пешочком до гостиницы чигирями по внутренним дворикам. Очень интересно глянуть как живут люди
❤92👍46🔥8😢6
Съесть и желательно выжить 😁 Что это я не знаю , с чем это я не знаю , выживу ? Не знаю 🤭
👍72❤10😱5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤16👍9
Итак В 5 утра на рынке с лицами славянской внешности только мы 😂 Интересно, местами некомфортно и иногда противно (китайцы спокойно харкают под ноги 🤭я в один момент еле успела ногу убрать ) . Цены - сказка . Но обманывают . Я покупала манго , он стоит 8 юаней за кг , она ставит цену 18 и чешет что то по своему . Я ей показываю - извини дорогая цену поменяй. Она возмущается 🤭 раз сходила , мне хватит Еще больше в …
👍43❤18😁12🙈1
Вот что я еще могу делать в 5 утра ? Вытащить мужа на утренний китайский рынок 🤭 Ну а почему бы и нет, выспимся на пенсии , а сейчас надо брать от жизни все . Пойдем глянем как живут китайцы
👍78🔥28❤16😁6💯2
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @jenya_fermer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tanya_derzhits · 69,082#1
@selchanka · 94,281#2
@tatianka_fermer · 76,480#3
@anna_akininaa · 159,760#4
@usadbavin · 8,136#5
@ired_cap · 156,973#6
@zacvetet · 102,876#7
@hochusvoyd0m · 7,382#8
@kuzovleva_ptichka · 22,273#9
@katya_v_dome2 · 12,459#10
@evesna · 105,858#11
@dasha_nahutoree · 19,059#12
@Fiverprimorye · 32,099#13
@Irina_kuznecova18 · 155,825#14
@Semya_pirlik · 7,303#15
@moy_ogorod · 36,600#16
@anasty_cooking · 39,541#17
@mebis_58 · 26,921#18
@galka_village_life1 · 8,375#19
@frau_luda · 20,928#20
@mogendoshka · 12,697#21
@ljvova_olga1 · 74,939#22
@IrinaSmirnova1 · 189,171#23
@celo_i_yulya · 16,839#24
@tasha_mulyar_kanal · 63,748#25
@prokopchanka · 13,327#26
@shopogolik_na_dietax · 7,650#27
@nastya_loseva_kanal · 28,011#28
@domsadrezepty · 19,649#29
@rizhaya_belka_home · 20,186#30
@alenkamorozik · 100,223#31
@tomatia_semena · 7,101#32
@anakitchen · 22,456#33
@IraRogashova21 · 79,275#34
@ninaizsibiri · 14,227#35
@domaneskuchno · 12,254#36
@sadovita · 2,291#37
@poli_na_malinaa · 154,582#38
@maryskina_derevnya · 9,116#39
@annet_my_life · 7,337#40
@spottykit · 156,248#41
@mit_life · 6,085#42
@moi_sad_yulia · 27,455#43
@GuGRLL_LCVY0MzAy · 3,030#44
@zizyulya_maria · 43,694#45
@Idamova · 9,995#46
@elenastupniova · 25,649#47
@naumova_garden · 21,060#48
@greenery_garden · 3,607#49
@villageteacherlife · 1,719#50
@valechkatetechka · 16,999#51
@irinkina_derevnya · 1,424#52
@lenchiklappp · 24,171#53
@marisha_recepti1 · 98,857#54
@pomidoromama3 · 8,215#55
@EkaterinaKumi · 65,981#56
@lpx_2024 · 2,823#57
@nani_life2 · 169,490#58
@yana_sad_19 · 89,200#59
@zarema_rostovrezerv_1 · 240,781#60
@aramataramat · 16,609#61
@semena_partner_director · 45,386#62
@dima_moget · 50,717#63
@natali_iz_zari · 23,852#64
@skorpion_house · 3,949#65
@blogklubnichnika · 821#66
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kuzovleva_ptichka · 22,273
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 September 2026
@mebis_58 · 26,921
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
@frau_luda · 20,928
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 September 2026
@naumova_garden · 21,060
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 September 2026
@dasha_nahutoree · 19,059
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 3 October 2026
@white_eden_me · 25,027
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 September 2026
@netfermer_ru · 25,290
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 14 September 2026
@anakitchen · 22,456
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 September 2026
@natali_iz_zari · 23,852
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
@lenchiklappp · 24,171
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
@anastasia_pigozina · 23,983
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
@ebanistaru · 27,086
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
@marya_max1108 · 39,845
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 September 2026
@irina_lillo · 94,263
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Женя фермер” (@jenya_fermer), 33,028 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jenya_fermer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.