Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kempel.yulia

Channel

Kempel.yulia

@ebanistaru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,391subscribers

-197 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001638293704
TypeChannel
Username@ebanistaru
DescriptionАвтор книги «Реставрируй» https://ebanista.ru РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/673b25719d804a279bbc262e
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ebanistaru

Growth

27,39127,58827,489.57 August 2026 — 27,588 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,583 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,570 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,563 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,561 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,550 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,537 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,521 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,511 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,496 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,480 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,470 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,460 subscribers21 August 2026 — 27,449 subscribers23 August 2026 — 27,447 subscribers24 August 2026 — 27,435 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,424 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,415 subscribers27 August 2026 — 27,405 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,399 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,391 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
21 measurements spanning 22 days, net -197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,361–27,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 17:1327,391-8
28 Aug 2026, 20:2227,399-6
27 Aug 2026, 21:0427,405-10
26 Aug 2026, 20:5827,415-9
25 Aug 2026, 22:1427,424-11
24 Aug 2026, 18:5927,435-12
23 Aug 2026, 04:0227,447-2
21 Aug 2026, 18:3627,449-11
20 Aug 2026, 16:5627,460-10
19 Aug 2026, 17:2227,470-10
18 Aug 2026, 15:5827,480-16
17 Aug 2026, 15:2527,496-15
16 Aug 2026, 06:3627,511-10
14 Aug 2026, 15:3727,521-16
13 Aug 2026, 05:4527,537-13
12 Aug 2026, 02:5727,550-11
11 Aug 2026, 03:2927,561-2
10 Aug 2026, 00:2827,563-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:5127,570-13
8 Aug 2026, 01:0127,583first reading

Engagement

86 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 27,391 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,360
86 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 86 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held86 (5 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total374,710
Reactions total39,491
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,300
Videos
9,790
Links
306

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26m 41s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

39,491 reactions across 86 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15,72239.8%
🤣9,63824.4%
custom 52944188000981556014,18110.6%
custom 52783706934513614153,7539.50%
custom 53237750347103180662,5706.51%
custom 52962811537522863461,3853.51%
custom 54633356590768537248442.14%
custom 53099431698429645095041.28%
custom 53775757192053538244291.09%
custom 59698847505071513203130.793%
custom 53211047203983978351520.385%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39,491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 86 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ebanistaru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 86 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.49%
3 of 86 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
4,500
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
4,290
over 83 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHoZ1r9122 August 202622 August 2026
2W5zFJ2jVfw117 August 202617 August 2026
F7NfYUJCUneVdwr69ctC112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC≈3,190 views607 reactions6 Starsread 30 August 2026
Video

Доброе утречко ❤️

372custom 5323775034710318066118custom 529628115375228634657🤣36custom 52944188000981556018custom 53099431698429645098custom 52783706934513614154custom 54633356590768537244

28 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈3,530 views395 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Дорогой дневник, …

273custom 527837069345136141546custom 530994316984296450936custom 529441880009815560122custom 529628115375228634613custom 53775757192053538243custom 54633356590768537242

27 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈4,220 views522 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Тот кто выше всех этих игрищ, как почуял, что намечается какая-то лабуда, залез под кровать и вылез когда все разбрелись по углам. Но его бы я тоже угадала. У него шея забита и напряжена всегда.

🤣310145custom 529628115375228634641custom 532377503471031806620custom 54633356590768537246

27 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈4,050 views279 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣22042custom 54633356590768537249custom 53237750347103180666custom 52944188000981556012

27 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈4,000 views544 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Развлекаемся как можем

261🤣204custom 529441880009815560159custom 527837069345136141515custom 54633356590768537245

27 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC≈4,010 views341 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Суставы не бросаю, видимо когда приспичит легче не бросать

220custom 527837069345136141566custom 529441880009815560142custom 596988475050715132011custom 54633356590768537242

27 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC≈4,020 views330 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Решили мы самокат расчехлить, который 2 года не заряжался. При зарядке выдает ошибку 46, Гугл говорит, что это внешний аккумулятор ушел в спячку и разбудить его можно только принудительно в обход платы. Звоню в ремонт электросамокатов, мол так и так говорю, они - мы заберем самокат, сделаем диагностику за 3500₽, скажем в чем дело и сколько будет стоить ремонт и потом через 2 недели вернем самокат… Понятно говорю, раз

custom 532377503471031806619487custom 537757571920535382435custom 54633356590768537247custom 52944188000981556014custom 52783706934513614153

26 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈4,570 views659 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Когда твоя женщина постарше…

custom 5323775034710318066371130🤣99custom 529441880009815560126custom 546333565907685372423custom 529628115375228634610

26 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈4,630 views289 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

какие дни такие и рекорды 🙄

195custom 529441880009815560182custom 546333565907685372412

25 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,840 views593 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Вечерние зарисовки. Брита поселилась на моей прикроватной тумбе. 10ти килограммовая парочка проломила Михе крышу. Я шторы подшила и люстры в доме перемыла, даже бумажные 🙄

custom 5278370693451361415279custom 5294418800098155601170123🤣11custom 53775757192053538245custom 54633356590768537244custom 52962811537522863461

25 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC≈4,540 views408 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Утренние зарисовки. Приперла вчера, помимо велика и инвентаря спортивного, машинку из дома. Хочу шторы подшить. Не прошло и 7 (вроде) лет. Книги пришли, начала с перевала. На первой странице предисловия пустила слезу и такая «это нам подходит, берем».

283custom 527837069345136141567custom 529441880009815560145custom 529628115375228634611custom 54633356590768537242

24 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈4,830 views525 reactions5 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Как думаете о чем она думает сейчас?

🤣37878custom 537757571920535382451custom 529628115375228634612custom 54633356590768537246

Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @ebanistaru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 111,127 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FOREST FAIRY HOME
@forest_fairy_home · 43,633
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
Журнал «Петрович.Знает»
@znaet_petrovich · 50,798
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 25 August 2026
Клуб zhenya_prorab
@zhenya_prorab · 52,584
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
marinamalinovaya
@marinamalinovaya · 65,762
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
stalinka_na_mojaike
@stalinka_na_mojaike1 · 113,081
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026
Канал «Дом быта»
@dmbt_media · 44,300
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kempel.yulia” (@ebanistaru), 27,391 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ebanistaru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.