Channel
@iws_russia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002010016077 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iws_russia |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iws_russia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 37 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 37 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (29 March 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 22 | 34.4% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 21.9% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 20.3% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| custom 5197706972794731241 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| custom 5256047523620995497 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5465465194056525619 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.56% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Павлу Дурову предъявили обвинение в содействии терроризму по уголовному делу в России. И объявили в международный розыск. Речь идет о деле против Telegram из-за неудаления запрещенного в РФ контента. Самому Дурову вменяют часть 1.1 статьи 205.1 УК. Если вина Павла будет доказана, ему может грозить пожизненное заключение.
😱2
У сайтов российских компаний отзывают SSL-сертификаты. Из-за этого они могут не открываться через зарубежные браузеры — Chrome, Safari, Firefox. Решение принял японский удостоверяющий центр GlobalSign, уже второй раз за неделю. При отсутствии SSL-сертификата браузеры ругаются на небезопасность сайта или просто блокируют его. Пока затронуло только российские госкомпании. Но есть риск, что список пополнится. И к Glob…
🫡3🤔1😱1custom 51977069727947312411
Все смартфоны поставят на учет: в России приняли закон о создании реестра IMEI мобильных устройств. При ввозе в страну 15-значный идентификатор каждого девайса будут заносить в отдельную базу. Если гаджет ввезли нелегально или украли, он не пройдет проверку операторов и не сможет работать в российских мобильных сетях. А еще операторы будут всегда видеть, в каких устройствах используются их SIM-карты. Заработает с …
🫡3👀1🤔1
⚡️ Войти через Google больше не получится: владельцев сайтов будут штрафовать до ₽700 тыс. за авторизацию через зарубежные сервисы. Входить на сайты теперь разрешают только по номеру телефона, биометрии, через Госуслуги или другие российские сервисы.
🤯2
Россия ограничила ввоз ПК, ноутбуков, жестких дисков и другой техники. Вступил в силу новый перечень товаров, разрешенных к параллельному импорту. Под удар попали: Samsung, Intel, Sony, Asus, Acer, Nintendo, Nvidia, Nokia, Sandisk и другие бренды. Всего — больше 30 компаний, чью продукцию станет сложнее ввозить. Одна из официальных причин: в России уже есть аналоги.
🤯4custom 51977069727947312411custom 52560475236209954971
РКН планирует контролировать 98% всего трафика в рунете к 2030 году. Это прямо прописано в документе о предоставлении субсидий. На что еще выделят деньги: блокировку всех VPN на 92%, увеличение пропускной способности ТСПУ примерно в 6 раз и автоматизированную «систему обеспечения безопасности» интернета. Дедлайн по установлению контроля за всем рунетом — 31 декабря 2030 года.
🤯4🤔1😱1
Tesla выпустили первый серийный электрокар без руля и педалей — Cybercab. Авто полностью управляется ИИ. В нем даже нет зеркал, только экран на приборной панели. Cybercab будут использовать в сервисе такси от Tesla. Ожидаемая цена — $30 тыс. (₽2,2 млн). Примерно как Lada Vesta.
🔥4custom 52560475236209954971custom 54654651940565256191
Тысячи российских провайдеров могут исчезнуть с рынка: Минцифры хочет изменить правила работы операторов домашнего интернета. Вместо 20 разных видов лицензий планируют сделать три, требования к капиталу и инфраструктуре станут жестче. Под них пока подходят всего 7,6% компаний из 4,2 тыс. Новые правила могут заработать уже 1 сентября.
🫡4
Кажется, операторы не будут брать деньги за VPN-трафик с 1 мая. Они технически не готовы к новым правилам. С россиян хотят брать по ₽150 за каждый ГБ после превышения лимита в 15 ГБ. Но операторы не успевают настроить биллинговые системы и просят Минцифры дать отсрочку. Кто-то просит дать время до осени, а некоторые хотят отсрочить проект до 2028 года.
🔥4👏1custom 51977069727947312411
Домашний интернет в России может подорожать на 30%. Все из-за новых требований к провайдерам. Минцифры хочет ввести обязательные платные лицензии и подключение к СОРМ. Если инициативу примут, расходы операторов вырастут, а за ними и цены для абонентов. Кажется, скоро у нас будет нестабильный мобильный и дорогой домашний.
🫡3
Уровень сетевых сбоев Telegram вырос до 100%. Это значит, что все запросы к домену сейчас проходят с ошибками или не проходят вообще. В числе регионов со сбоями внезапно появились Нидерланды. Видимо, мессенджер работает нестабильно даже с VPN. Полная блокировка все-таки произошла?
🫡3
Telegram будет адаптироваться под блокировки: Дуров объявил о начале «Цифрового сопротивления» против ограничений. Telegram был заблокирован в России — тем не менее, 65 млн россиян до сих пор пользуются им ежедневно. Добро пожаловать в «Цифровое сопротивление», мои русские братья и сестры. Теперь вся нация мобилизована, чтобы обойти эти абсурдные ограничения А если конкретно, то Telegram собирается продолжить услож…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @iws_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 905,340 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇷🇺IWS” (@iws_russia), 37 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iws_russia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.