Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ivan Quality

@ivanquality

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

264subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001545913859
TypeChannel
Username@ivanquality
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ivanquality

Growth

2649 Aug 2026, 00:01 — 264 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 20:57 — 264 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 00:019 Aug 2026, 20:57
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 263–265 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 20:57264no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:01264first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 22 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 55s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 11 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4331.6%
🔥2115.4%
😁1511.0%
👍107.35%
👏75.15%
custom 526255936835160228042.94%
❤‍🔥42.94%
👻42.94%
custom 522678059855879467132.21%
🌚32.21%
🎉32.21%
custom 523558837818701358421.47%
custom 523818573818443521921.47%
custom 526061498941206345121.47%
🏆21.47%
💅21.47%
💘21.47%
😍21.47%
😱21.47%
🍌10.735%
2 further kinds21.47%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 15 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 May 2026, 07:55 UTC262 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Очень выпал из жизни, сейчас немного акклиматизации и выйду с постами

5🔥3😁2

25 Mar 2026, 11:18 UTC594 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Хакатон 2026 Мы вписались в эту авантюру. Это офлайн конкурс, где 25 команд, за 24 часа собирают рекламный ролик на ИИ, полный карт-бланш на креатив. Приехали со своим оборудованием и настроем «ну погнали». Были 3 спонсора. Каждая команда выбирает бренд, с которым работает. Мы решили: берем KGM ( бывший SsangYong) и делаем из этого свою историю. Выступали от XOAI. Команда: Рома и Саша Гекс (канал Саши). (ну и я да

👏74custom 52267805985587946713😍2custom 52355883781870135842👎1

5 Mar 2026, 09:49 UTC495 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Так немного лайфхак. По дефолту в вэйви нет новых разрешений, которые добавились во второй банане (4:1 и 8:1) Если просто писать промптом, то не выдает нужное соотношение сторон Чтобы все получилось добавляем ноду Text Iterator и пишем туда нужное соотнощение сторон Вход горит красным, но все работает. Получаются картинки в нужном соотношении. Соотношение не обязательно в таком случае прописывать в промпте, все

4❤‍🔥4👍2

20 Feb 2026, 14:53 UTC404 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @POMOYI_CGVideo

CTVMZ

🔥6💘2😱21

7 Feb 2026, 11:09 UTC526 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нейрорендер Долго собирал сетап для рендера в ComfyUI Что-то получилось, делюсь WIP WAN 2.2 На входе референсное изображение и канал грубины Получается близко к рефу, но не 1в1 Над этим и работаю. Хочется получать более предсказуемый и похожий на реф результат. Потому что сейчас все туда, все близко, но одновременно не туда и не близко Рендерится конечно быстро, на 77 кадров в 720р ушло 10 минут. В общем есть

👍74🔥4💯1

3 Feb 2026, 17:04 UTC438 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁7👻4💅2custom 52606149894120634512

3 Feb 2026, 17:04 UTC409 viewsread 9 August 2026

Тест пошел не по плану. Но что-то в этом есть

28 Jan 2026, 11:09 UTC555 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

И еще тест на эту же тему Перспектива машины изначально выставлена не правильно, поэтому выглядит странно. Но сама суть понятна и отрабатывает в целом неплохо

5🔥4🎉3custom 52625593683516022801

26 Jan 2026, 20:16 UTC466 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Это в продолжение вот этого поста. Все тоже самое, просто другой исходник и другое применение, которое более актуально и наглядно, особенно для работы в XO(VP/AI)

👍1

26 Jan 2026, 20:05 UTC490 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Да, это нейрокомпоз. Просто кажется тут собрано все самое передовое, что есть на рынке. Это лэд экран самого крупного в России виртуального продакшена, локация собрана в Unreal Engine, физическая камера подключена к движку и в рил тайме мир на экране подстраивается под движения оператора. А пол заменил нейронкой. Обычно это либо декорации, либо пост. Но теперь добавляется еще одно «либо» Ни какого тебе на посте 3д

8🌚3🏆2custom 52381857381844352192

22 Jan 2026, 15:09 UTC417 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ресерч для проекта в ComfyUI Адаптировал 3 сетапа 1 Сетап - берет исходное изображение и ставит в референсную позу (вещь простая, но нужная) 2 Сетап - вкопмаживает объект по свету и перспективе 3 Сетап - менят ракурсы изображения Как будто все это можно делать в банане и прочих однокнопочных. НО. У нас очень сложный стиль, который не понимает ни один гереатор и редактор изображений. Он всегда смазывает детали

10custom 52625593683516022803🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @ivanquality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,051,843 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ivan Quality” (@ivanquality), 264 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivanquality.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.