Channel
@PythonForPentester
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,871subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001559557881 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PythonForPentester |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 9 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PythonForPentester |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 2,871 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:40 | 2,870 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 2,875 | +15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:30 | 2,860 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 2,860 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
376 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 220 | 58.5% | |
| 👍 | 117 | 31.1% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 8.51% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 1.60% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.266% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2023 to 2 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جلسه بیست و پنجم دوره سی پلاس پلاس جلسه هشتم پایتون پیشرفته 🔥تبدیل کد سی پلاس پلاس برنامه C2 به کد پایتون برای همین این جلسه ترکیب دو دوره شد https://t.me/CPlusPlus4Pentester https://t.me/PythonForPentester #cpp #Python
👍9❤1
Signed akhzari
جلسه هفتم پایتون نوشتن ابزار گرافیکی تست نفوذ XSS و معرفی روش توسعه اون البته دقت نکردم موقع کدنویسی پارامتر رو بفرستم که خودتون باید کد رو کامل کنین #Python
👍9❤5🔥2
Signed akhzari
تصویر استفاده شده در ویدیوی بالا👆
👍13❤1
Signed akhzari
اثر دانینگ-کروگر خیلی از کاربران راجع به نقشه راه میپرسن و برخی هم بخاطر سختی راه ناامید میشن و ول میکنن جواب شما توی این ویدیو هست اگر ناامید شدین از ادامه راه یادگیری و ...
👍8
Signed akhzari
طی صحبتی که با آکادمی دوران انجام شد دوستان میتونن برای دریافت مدرک پایتون برای تست نفوذ مقدماتی اقدام کنن با اکانت زیر هماهنگباشین @A_khanbabakhani
👍6❤1👌1
Signed akhzari
جلسه ششم با کمک ماژول watchdog اومدیم یه ابزاری نوشتیم برای بچه های تیم آبی که تغییرات فایلها و پوشه ها رو بتونن مانیتور کنن #Python
👍5
Signed akhzari
فراخوان ثبت نام دوره Sec450 اولین دوره رسمی تیم آبی از شرکت Sans هزینه شرکت در دوره 3 میلیون تومان شروع دوره 1 شهریور ماه تخفیف 1 میلیون تومانی به مناسبت ایام محرم تا 10 محرم (6 مرداد ماه)
👍6👎4
Signed akhzari
ویدیوی معرفی دوره Sec503
Signed akhzari
فراخوان ثبت نام دوره Sec503 - تحلیل ترافیک شبکه نحوه برگزاری آفلاین زمان شروع دوره : 15 تیرماه مدت دوره : حدود 45 ساعت هزینه شرکت در دوره : 3 میلیون تومان (امکان پرداخت اقساطی وجود دارد) تخفیف ویژه 1 میلیون برای کسانی که تا 1 تیر ثبت نام کنند مخاطب دوره : تمام کسانیکه در حوزه امنیت کار میکنند خصوصا آن دسته از کسانی که امنیت شبکه و اکسپلویت کار میکنند و نان شب کسانی که در حوزه SOC فعالیت میکنند همراه با صدور مدرک (ن…
❤1
Signed akhzari
چند نفر از دانشجویان که قبلا دوره اسمبلی و سی پلاس پلاس و معکوس من شرکت داشتن( قصه برای ۵ سال پیشه) ویدیوهای دوره اسمبلی و سی پلاس پلاس و پایتون جدید که رایگان برگزار کردم رو دیدن و یه گروه تشکیل دادن و خودمم عضو کردن و اشکالات و کم گویی هایی که تو دوره هست رو بهم تذکر دادن😂 بهشون میگم اینا رو کی یادتون داده میگه شما 😁 میگم به نظرت بلد نبودم همینهایی که به شما گفتم رو همینجا بگم؟ گفتم بله پس چرا نگفتین اینجا بود که م…
👍23❤8👎1🔥1
Signed akhzari
جلسه پنجم پایتون برای تست نفوذ پیشرفته با استفاده از ماژول Scapy یه پکت ساختیم و با دونستن یه سری دیتا تونستیم از سیستم قربانی شل بگیریم #Python
🔥7❤1👍1
Signed akhzari
جلسه چهارم پایتون برای تست نفوذ پیشرفته ⭐️فایلهای تکمیل شده سورس اوین ابزار (سرور و کلاینت) (یه ایراد ظریفی داره که باید بهش پی ببرین و برطرفش کنین اگر متوجه ایراد شدین میتونین از کارتون و برطرف کردن ایراد کپچر بگیرین و به اسم خودتون در صورت تمایل تو کانال منتشر میشه) #Python
👍4❤1
Signed akhzari
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PythonForPentester. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“python4pentester” (@PythonForPentester), 2,871 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PythonForPentester.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.