Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ¡ Испанский - прокачай !

Channel

¡ Испанский - прокачай !

@ispanskij_prokachaj

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

538subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002014227192
TypeChannel
Username@ispanskij_prokachaj
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ispanskij_prokachaj

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

535538536.528 August 2026 — 535 subscribers28 August 2026 — 535 subscribers7 September 2026 — 536 subscribers16 September 2026 — 538 subscribers28 August 202616 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 18 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 535–538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:55538+2
7 Sept 2026, 17:00536+1
28 Aug 2026, 19:15535no change
28 Aug 2026, 19:01535first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2555.6%
🔥1124.4%
👏613.3%
👍36.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 12:52 UTC243 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Дорогие друзья, здравствуйте! Рада сообщить Вам, что уже открыт прием в аспирантуру для испанистов по специальности 5.9.8. Кто заинтересован, пишите в личку!

🔥8

Signed Tatiana G.

20 Jun 2026, 21:48 UTC332 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

¿Cuál podría ser la moraleja moderna del cuento?

  1. Nunca hables con gatos31%
  2. Nunca te acerques a una cuba de vino23%
  3. Antes de prometer algo, espera a estar sobrio69%
  4. Los agujeros son más seguros que las cubas23%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Tatiana G.

20 Jun 2026, 21:40 UTC296 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Si el ratón hubiera estudiado Derecho, probablemente habría dicho:

  1. «No recuerdo nada»33%
  2. «La promesa carece de validez por alteración del estado de conciencia»58%
  3. «Miau»17%
  4. «Acepto mi destino»0%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Tatiana G.

20 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC222 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Según la lógica del ratón, una promesa hecha borracho:

  1. Tiene más valor17%
  2. Tiene menos valor50%
  3. Pertenece a otra dimensión jurídica33%
  4. Debe repetirse tres veces8%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Tatiana G.

20 Jun 2026, 21:36 UTC201 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

¿Qué aprendió el gato de esta experiencia?

  1. Que ayudar a los demás siempre merece la pena23%
  2. Que los ratones son animales agradecidos15%
  3. Que conviene leer la letra pequeña de las promesas69%
  4. Que el vino es peligroso para la salud15%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Tatiana G.

20 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC174 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

¿Cuál es el verdadero talento del ratón?

  1. Nadar en vino31%
  2. Escapar de los gatos25%
  3. Reinterpretar contratos después de firmarlos56%
  4. Cavar agujeros muy deprisa6%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Tatiana G.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ispanskij_prokachaj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jun 2026, 21:48 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

¿Cuál podría ser la moraleja moderna del cuento?

  1. Nunca hables con gatos31%
  2. Nunca te acerques a una cuba de vino23%
  3. Antes de prometer algo, espera a estar sobrio69%
  4. Los agujeros son más seguros que las cubas23%

The shares total 146%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jun 2026, 21:40 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Si el ratón hubiera estudiado Derecho, probablemente habría dicho:

  1. «No recuerdo nada»33%
  2. «La promesa carece de validez por alteración del estado de conciencia»58%
  3. «Miau»17%
  4. «Acepto mi destino»0%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Según la lógica del ratón, una promesa hecha borracho:

  1. Tiene más valor17%
  2. Tiene menos valor50%
  3. Pertenece a otra dimensión jurídica33%
  4. Debe repetirse tres veces8%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jun 2026, 21:36 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

¿Qué aprendió el gato de esta experiencia?

  1. Que ayudar a los demás siempre merece la pena23%
  2. Que los ratones son animales agradecidos15%
  3. Que conviene leer la letra pequeña de las promesas69%
  4. Que el vino es peligroso para la salud15%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

¿Cuál es el verdadero talento del ratón?

  1. Nadar en vino31%
  2. Escapar de los gatos25%
  3. Reinterpretar contratos después de firmarlos56%
  4. Cavar agujeros muy deprisa6%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 May 2026, 17:00 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Al ver el panorama, ¿qué conclusión saca el burro para salvar el pellejo?

  1. Que la vida de autónomo es muy dura, que se vive mejor siendo un currante flaco que un solomillo67%
  2. Que a partir de ahora se va a hacer vegetariano para no acabar como su compañero el cerdo.33%
  3. Que lo mejor es seguir fingiendo para que le sigan dando vino todas las mañanas.17%
  4. Que va a montar una huelga general en el establo para pedir mejores condiciones.0%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 30 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Испанский язык!
@espanol_spanish_castellano · 43,517
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“¡ Испанский - прокачай !” (@ispanskij_prokachaj), 538 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ispanskij_prokachaj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.