Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Квантовый Регрессолог НеоПСИХОЛОГИЯ С ИРИНОЙ.

Channel

Квантовый Регрессолог НеоПСИХОЛОГИЯ С ИРИНОЙ.

@irina_regresolog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

494subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001112626535
TypeChannel
Username@irina_regresolog
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/irina_regresolog

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4945125036 August 2026 — 512 subscribers6 August 2026 — 512 subscribers13 August 2026 — 510 subscribers20 August 2026 — 507 subscribers27 August 2026 — 503 subscribers2 September 2026 — 502 subscribers10 September 2026 — 500 subscribers19 September 2026 — 494 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 45 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 491–515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:38494-6
10 Sept 2026, 21:37500-2
2 Sept 2026, 08:42502-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:47503-4
20 Aug 2026, 13:08507-3
13 Aug 2026, 10:16510-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:33512no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:53512first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

293 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9532.4%
🔥9331.7%
👍3913.3%
👏3612.3%
🥰227.51%
🙏51.71%
😁31.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰2🔥1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

20 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://t.me/biohimia_live

👍1👏1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

20 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC47 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2🥰1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

7 Jun 2026, 11:24 UTC115 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Когда «железная леди» уходит. И начинается жизнь на другой ветке реальности. Раньше я жила на другой ветке, (как метро). Была ветка на которой надо было выживать. Держать удар. Решать всё самой. Я была той, кого называют «железной». И в какой-то момент та версия меня просто закончилась. Не физически. Смыслы сменились. Началось всё с тонкого плана. Я пошла изучать энергетические тела, ауру, информационные поля. Ка

6🔥1🥰1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

30 May 2026, 06:58 UTC116 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥43🥰2

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

5 May 2026, 08:25 UTC170 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Дорама, ветки реальности и тело: как физика и соматика объясняют «переход» в новую жизнь** Недавно пересматривала корейскую дораму о параллельных мирах. Один слой там существует как «комикс» — прописанный сценарий, другой ощущается как «настоящая» жизнь. Герои буквально переходят из одной ветки в другую, меняя исход событий. Звучит как фантастика. Но если убрать киношные эффекты, останется точная метафора того, как

🔥3👏2🥰2

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

21 Apr 2026, 06:19 UTC146 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Переход, которого все ждали, уже случился Мы больше не в точке ожидания. Мы — в точке осознанного выбора той версии жизни, которую хотим видеть вокруг. Долгое время мы жили на частоте «доказывания». Упреков. Сравнений. Тихой зависти к тем, кто «успел раньше». Казалось, что если разобрать боль, страх, стыд — откроется дверь к изобилию. Но пространство отвечало зеркалом. Пока мы транслируем «кто-то лучше», «мне не да

5👏4🔥2🥰2

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

15 Apr 2026, 11:03 UTC111 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Частота внутренняя меняет реальность

🔥4👍2👏2🥰1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

14 Apr 2026, 17:35 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Ответ о целостности.

👏1🔥1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

13 Apr 2026, 05:55 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Целостность, исцеление. Новое звучание и почему обрести целостность не так просто, как кажется.

🔥52👏1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

12 Apr 2026, 16:44 UTC122 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

✅Однажды, в качестве эксперимента, собак выставили соревноваться с гепардом. Целью было выяснить, кто быстрее. Все были удивлены, что гепард НЕ двинулся с места… Спросив у координатора гонки, "что случилось", ответ был таким: "Гепард не собака, он НЕ будет соревноваться с ними!" ⚠Пытаться доказать, что ты лучше - это трата времени. Нам не нужно никому ничего доказывать, опускаться до уровня других людей. ⚠⚠⚠ Нам ну

🔥4👍2👏2

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

12 Apr 2026, 05:24 UTC104 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥43🥰1

Signed Irina Albis КВАНТОВЫЙ РЕГРЕССОЛОГ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @irina_regresolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Правильное питание | Рационы | Рецепты
@ppfood_web · 36,250
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Квантовый Регрессолог НеоПСИХОЛОГИЯ С ИРИНОЙ.” (@irina_regresolog), 494 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irina_regresolog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.