Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 44 days, net +185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,676–4,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:18
4,889
+6
14 Sept 2026, 07:17
4,883
+27
10 Sept 2026, 16:39
4,856
+21
5 Sept 2026, 21:56
4,835
+4
2 Sept 2026, 01:47
4,831
+18
29 Aug 2026, 15:56
4,813
+40
27 Aug 2026, 00:56
4,773
-1
23 Aug 2026, 22:02
4,774
-6
20 Aug 2026, 13:33
4,780
+6
17 Aug 2026, 09:48
4,774
+24
13 Aug 2026, 10:36
4,750
+3
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
4,747
+41
6 Aug 2026, 19:38
4,706
+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:52
4,704
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:34
4,704
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 64 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,206 reactions across 49 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,574
30.2%
❤
900
17.3%
🤣
651
12.5%
🤬
596
11.4%
😁
491
9.43%
🍌
242
4.65%
👌
175
3.36%
👏
115
2.21%
💩
97
1.86%
🔥
62
1.19%
😢
59
1.13%
🥴
59
1.13%
🗿
23
0.442%
🤮
21
0.403%
🙏
19
0.365%
🌭
17
0.327%
👎
17
0.327%
💔
15
0.288%
🍓
14
0.269%
💯
8
0.154%
15 further kinds
51
0.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,045 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حتی در عصر مشروطه، برخی علمای سابق دینی مانند احمد کسروی کوشیدند تا با خروج از دایره تفسیر انحصاری از اسلام، دین جایگزین ارائه دهند که بازهم مورد محبت مسلمین واقع شدند و با ۲۷ ضربه چاقو و مقادیری گلوله توسط دوستان شریعتی و سروش از پای در آمدند. حتی کسی مانند جنتخواه (صرفنظر از عدم همسویی صاحب این کیبورد با نظراتش) در عین تلاش برای ایجاد تطابق میان اسلام با مالکیت خصوصی و لیبرالیسم، توسط مسلمین تحمل نشد و دربند شد. …
🖌️مجتبی اسکندری
ردیهای بر رد دادن سروش
عبدالکریم سروش بازهم دهان گشاد خود را به پهنای فلک گشود و در پدافند از شریعت و شریعتی، لجن پراکند. آنچه اکنون بر مردم ایران میرود، نتیجه تمناهای شریعتیست. او بود که جهان را صحنه پیوسته یک نبرد عاشورایی میدید و اکنون تمام کارگزاران شکوهمند اسلامی نیز بر این باورند که صحنهای یزیدی/حسینی برپاست و آنها نیز باید کاری حسینی کنند. او بود که با لفاظی و رتوریکهای مزخرف، دین را ا…
یک خاطره به مناسبت تولد استاد زریاب؛
استادی برجسته، برایم تعریف میکرد که زنده یاد زریاب اهل سیاست نبود. سری داشت که تمام در کار و علاقهاش بود. خلاصه که سرش به کار خودش بود.
بعد از ۲۸ مرداد گروهی معلومالحال بیمایه زیرآب او را در دانشگاه میزنند که فلانی[یعنی شادروان زریاب] مصدقی است. در حالی که چنین نبود. پس از مدتی ، شهبانو فرح پهلوی به برای بازدید از دانشگاه به آن محل وارد میشوند.
آنجا استادان یک عکس گرو…
https://isna.ir/xdWS2J
علی بهرامیان - عضو شورای عالی علمی مرکز دائرةالمعارف بزرگ اسلامی و پژوهشگر تاریخ - در یادداشتی به مناسبت زادروز عباس زریاب خویی و گرامیداشت این مورخ، ادیب، نسخهشناس، نویسنده و مترجم با عنوان «زریاب دریای دانش» که برای انتشار در اختیار ایسنا قرار داده، نوشته است:
📎 https://isna.ir/xdWS2J
🖌️مصطفی نصیری
زندهیاد دکتر طباطبایی، زمانیکه در آمریکا تحت درمان بود، به بنده و نیز برخی دوستان دیگر، گفتند که دکتر سروش، دو بار تماس گرفته و ضمن احوالپرسی، مفصل در باره مابهالاختلافها صحبت کرده و بسیاری از خصومتهایش را کنار گذاشته است. بعد از آن گفتگوها که دکتر طباطبایی گفتند؛ بدلیل احاطه درد بیماری، نتوانسته بودند به سومین تماسش، پاسخ دهند، دکتر سروش در یکی از درسهایش در باره قدرت، کلی از کتاب جدال قدیم و جد…
اصلاح طلب کارش اینه؛ از جیبش نقل و نبات در میاره به اسم آمار، بعد منافع خودش هم ادامهاش میاره.
اینها به ۴۷ سال شیادی عادت کردهاند.
جوادی فکر کرده آمار مثل مهریه است، گفته چهل و هفت ساله آمار دادیم کسی نگفت از کجا، به قولی کی داده کی گرفته.
خلاصهکه بوی کباب شنیده ولی نمیدونه خر داغ میکنن
استوری احمد خدایی همسر جاویدنام #صالحه_اکبری از پیامی مجاهدین خلق بهش داده شدن که در ازای پول علیه خاندان پهلوی استوری بذاره و اعلام برائت کنه
تف تو ذات هرچی مجاهده حرومزادس
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
انقلاب ۵۷ انقلاب ادبا و شعرا؟
نگاهی به زندگی انقلابیون ۵۷ کنید؛ بیشترشان عنعنه گو، مترجم ادبی، نویسنده آبکی و شاعران ایدئولوژیک بودند.
انقلابهایی که توسط ادبا، روشنفکران و نظریهپردازان ایدئولوژیک هدایت میشوند، اغلب سرشتی متفاوت و در عین حال خطرناکتر از سایر تحولات سیاسی دارند.
زمانی که اهل قلم و تئوریهای مبتنی بر تخیل، به جای سیاستمدارانِ کارکشته، سکاندار تغییرات بنیادین میشوند، مفاهیم انتزاعی و آرمانشهری…
👍87❤19👏7🍓3🍌2👎1💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @iranpazhohi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تاریخاندیشی ــ مهدی تدینی @tarikhandishi · 111,604 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اشکان زارع” (@iranpazhohi), 4,889 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranpazhohi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.