https://t.me/iranian_familyy
❤4👍2

Channel
@iranian_familyy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,459subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001140648904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iranian_familyy |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iranian_familyy |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 1,459 | -1 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 1,460 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 1,461 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 1,468 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:07 | 1,471 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 1,475 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 1,476 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 1,475 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 1,470 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,471 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 1,476 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 1,477 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,476 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 1,476 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
33 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 51.5% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 36.4% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/iranian_familyy
❤4👍2
https://t.me/iranian_familyy
🙏3👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
پدیده نیما تکلو؛ به ظاهر یک یوتیوبر، یک شبه نامش بر سر زبان ها افتاده، کار خاصی هم نمی کرده، هنر ویژه ای هم نداشته، صرفا با اجرای طنز و هیجانی نوجوانان رو سرگرم می کرده، البته این سرگرمی همراه با آسیب هایی هم بوده است. پس از استقبال گسترده از نیما در ایران مال مسئولان متوجه عمق حادثه شده و بدون هیچ توضیحی پیج او را مسدود کردند. اما ریشه ها و عوامل توجه غیرعادی نوجوان ما نسبت به چنین افراد و برنامه هایی از کجا ناشی می…
👍6
لینک ورود https://meet.google.com/gqv-czwq-oqw https://t.me/iranian_familyy
https://t.me/iranian_familyy
✉️⭕️دعوتنامه برای حضور عموم علاقمندان در آیین نکوداشت استاد اسمعیل خلیلی ❇انجمن جامعهشناسی ایران، با همکاری جمعی از نهادها و انجمنهای علمی، به پاس سالها خدمات ارزشمند علمی، پژوهشی و آموزشی، #آیین_نکوداشت_اسمعیل_خلیلی؛ پژوهشگر، اندیشمند برجسته و عضو ادوار هیأتمدیره انجمن جامعهشناسی ایران را برگزار میکند. ✨ در این مراسم، جمعی از استادان، پژوهشگران، دانشجویان، همکاران، اعضای خانواده و علاقهمندان، با پاسداشت سال…
*رسانهها چه نقشی در افزایش مصرف دخانیات زنان دارند؟* 🔹علی نوری دکترای جامعه شناسی در گفتوگو با رسانه تصویری «آن»: «رسانهها با نمایش مکرر مصرف سیگار در فیلمها، سریالها، فضای مجازی و توسط سلبریتیها، الگوهای رفتاری جدیدی برای دختران و زنان ایجاد میکنند. در کنار تغییرات اجتماعی و افزایش استقلال زنان، این الگوپذیری میتواند به افزایش گرایش به مصرف دخانیات دامن بزند.» https://rubika.ir/post/zNwXPaschG
👍4
🔻جامعه و جنگ | سلسله نشست های تخصصی در تحلیل جامعه و جنگ | نشست سوم: خانواده | ۲۴ تیر ۱۴۰۵ 🎙علی نوری 📍گروه جامعه شناسی حقوق انجمن جامعهشناسی ایران @sociologyoflaw
❤1👌1
🔻مجله صوتی گروه جامعهشناسی حقوق انجمن جامعهشناسی ایران | سلسله نشست های تخصصی ➖جامعه و جنگ | نشست سوم: خانواده _ ۲۴ تیر ۱۴۰۵ با حضور: ▪️ بیدا میرحسینی 🎙 لینک دانلود سخنرانی ▪️ فهیمه نظری 🎙لینک دانلود سخنرانی ▪️ علی نوری 🎙لینک دانلود سخنرانی ▪️ سولماز شیخ شعاعی 🎙لینک دانلود سخنرانی ▪️ حمیرا حاجی محمدکاظمی 🎙لینک دانلود سخنرانی ▪️عباس نعیمی جورشری | مدیر علمی نشست 🎙لینک دانلود سخنرانی 📍 گروه جامعه شناس…
https://t.me/iranian_familyy لینک شرکت در نشست 👇👇👇 https://meet.google.com/gqv-czwq-oqw
👍1
۲.۱) اوقات فراغت، گردش، مصرف فرهنگی و رسانه:الگوهای مصرف رسانهای؛ مقایسه استانی و تحلیل شکافهای نسلی.تحلیل رفتارهای فراغتی (گردشگری، کافهگردی، سفر) و نسبت آن با وضعیت اقتصادی.رابطه رسانههای اجتماعی با احساس تنهایی، سبک فراغت و مشارکت اجتماعی.تفاوتهای جنسیتی در الگوهای گردشگری داخلی و خارجی.تحلیل سبکزندگی فراغتی در دوگانه شهر و روستا ۲.۲) بازیهای رایانهای، رسانه تعاملی و فرهنگ دیجیتال:تحلیل رفتار مصرف بازیهای…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iranian_familyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@iranian_familyy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال خانواده ایرانی و مسائل اجتماعی” (@iranian_familyy), 1,459 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranian_familyy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.