Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

هم‌آفرینی ایران آینده

@iranfutureprogram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

192subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002270576110
TypeChannel
Username@iranfutureprogram
Descriptionمجله «هم‌آفرینی ایران آینده» در پی گفتگوی کنشگران و مردمی سازی تصویر ایران آینده است. 🇮🇷 گروه آینده‌پژوهی مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/iranfutureprogram

Growth

1927 Aug 2026, 02:45 — 192 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 06:48 — 192 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:457 Aug 2026, 06:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 191–193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 06:48192no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:45192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
157
Videos
17
Links
147

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
861.5%
👍538.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Feb 2026, 10:45 UTC50 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🟠 زنجیرهٔ تأمینِ داده و فکت به کارخانه چهره و قصه در رسانه ‌ 🔷 چالش‌های بنیادین رسانه ملی در ایجاد مرجعیت چیست؟ ‌ 🖌️ برگرفته از مصاحبه با محمد لسانی، مشاور رسانه و مدرس سواد رسانه ‌ 💠 در میدان ارتباطات بحران، رسانه دیگر صرفاً ناقل خبر نیست، بلکه کنشگری فعال است که اگر از کنش سازی میدانی، چهره‌های همگراکننده و شبکه روایت‌ساز محروم باشد، ناگزیر به بازیگری واکنشی در چارچوب کلان‌روایت رسانه‌های رقیب فروکاسته می‌شود. تجرب

👍1

25 Feb 2026, 11:44 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🟠 کالبدشکافی تفاوت‌های بنیادین در بحران‌های اخیر ‌ 🔷 واکاوی شکاف‌ها، تغییرات جمعیتی و سازمان‌دهی مجازی ‌ 🖌️ دکتر مصطفی زمانیان، عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده حکمرانی دانشگاه تهران ‌ 💠 در تحلیل و بررسی بحران‌های اجتماعی اخیر در ایران، مشخص شده است که این بحران‌ها از ویژگی‌های خاصی برخوردار هستند که آن‌ها را از بحران‌های گذشته متمایز می‌کند. یکی از این ویژگی‌ها تغییر در بافت جمعیتی بحران‌هاست. در بحران‌های قبلی، عموماً غلبه بر

1

22 Feb 2026, 06:27 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🟠 آینه‌های شکسته تاریخ و آینده‌ای بُرنده ‌ 🔷 وقتی تاریخ کاریکاتوری و تقلیل‌یافته شود، چه بر سرِ آینده می‌آید؟ ‌ 🖌️ دکتر محمدمهدی رحیمی، پژوهشگر جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی ایران ‌ 💠 تاریخ معاصر ما آینه‌ای است که در نبرد روایت‌ها هزار تکه و هر کدامش، تصویری نامتوازن و خطرناک به آینده پرتاب می‌کند. عصیانِ مطلق امروز - که مرزهای خیر و شر را درمی‌نوردد و در دامنی از تخریبِ محض آرام می‌گیرد - را نباید صرفاً برآمده از دلخوری‌های اقت

👍2

22 Feb 2026, 06:27 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026

🟠 تغییر پارادایم اعتراضات در ایران ‌ 🔷 آینده ناآرامی‌های اخیر به کجا ختم می‌شود؟ ‌ 🖌️ دکتر حسین محمدی‌سیرت، عضو هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه امام صادق (ع) ‌ 💠 در تحلیل تفاوت‌های بحران‌های اخیر با ناآرامی‌های گذشته، شباهت‌های زیادی می‌توان یافت. به تعبیر رهبر انقلاب، همیشه دشمن در حال فعالیت است و این یک شباهت مشترک در تمامی بحران‌هاست. مسئله بهانه اقتصادی که در اغلب اعتراضات اخیر وجود دارد، به نوعی زمینه مشترک برای هر دو جریان

22 Feb 2026, 06:27 UTC27 viewsread 7 August 2026

🟠 فانتزیِ اعتراض و اعتراض فانتزی ‌ 🔷 در باب احساس جمعی فروبستگی آینده ‌ 🖌️ دکتر صابر اکبری، مدیر اندیشکده ایده‌های راهبردی ایران ‌ 💠 برای فهم نسبت مسئله آینده با اعتراضاتی که در سال‎های اخیر - خصوصاً در دی‎ماه ۱۴۰۴ه.ش- در ایران به وقوع پیوسته، می‎توان دو منظر را مورد توجه قرار داد: یک این که چون آینده نداریم - یا دست‌کم معترضان چنین احساس/تصوری دارند - اعتراض شکل می‌گیرد و دو این که خودِ برخی اعتراض‌ها هم آینده‌ای ند

22 Feb 2026, 06:26 UTC25 viewsread 7 August 2026

🟠 ضرورت گفت‌وگو در زمانه آشوب ‌ 🔷 چرا عبارت «ما با معترضان حرف می‌زنیم» را جدی نمی‌گیریم؟ ‌ 🖌️ دکتر هانیه دارائی، هم‌بنیان‌گذار مدرسه مطالعات اتوپیا ‌ 💠 «ما با معترض حرف می‌زنیم؛ اما اغتشاشگر را باید به جای خودش نشاند.» این عبارت رهبری در سیزدهم دی‌ماه، پرتکرارترین و مهم‌ترین تیتر رسانه‌های داخلی و خارجی درباره وقایع اخیر ایران بود. وقایعی که نه مدت زمان زیادی از آن گذشته است که فراموش شود، نه پیامدهای آن تمام شده که

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iranfutureprogram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 867,608 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هم‌آفرینی ایران آینده” (@iranfutureprogram), 192 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iranfutureprogram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.