Channel
@ippsy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,675subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001942266221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ippsy |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ippsy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 2,675 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 2,670 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 2,671 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 826 |
| Reactions total | 99 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
99 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 40.4% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 13.1% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 5.05% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.04% | |
| custom 5283080528818360566 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5469744063815102906 | 2 | 2.02% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.02% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💭 О рефералах, амбассадорах и возможностях, которые у вас уже есть Здравствуйте, коллеги! 👋 Сегодня я хочу рассказать о вещи, которая лежит буквально у вас под рукой, но которой многие не пользуются. Я говорю о нашей реферальной программе и об амбассадорстве. Зачем нам это? Когда мы создавали ИППСИ, мы хотели, чтобы это был не просто институт, а живое сообщество. Где каждый студент, каждый выпускник, каждый, кто и…
❤2👍1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4❤3🥰3
⚡️ Как перестать бояться группового формата и запустить свою первую терапевтическую группу? Многие психологи годами откладывают запуск групп. Понятно почему: динамика группы непредсказуема, непонятно, как отбирать участников, и одолевает страх растеряться перед конфликтом или молчанием в группе. При этом групповая психотерапия — один из самых эффективных форматов, который позволяет помогать большему количеству люде…
❤3custom 52830805288183605663🔥2
💭 Знакомая картина?) Коллеги, признавайтесь: у кого «дипломомания» в активной фазе? 😄
❤5🤣5😁4🔥1
🛠 Техника «Улитка» Тревожный клиент часто приходит на сессию в состоянии физического и психического перевозбуждения: ускоренное мышление, мышечное напряжение, поверхностное дыхание. В таких случаях эффективно срабатывают техники разделения и майндфулнесс-визуализации, которые имеют эмпирическую поддержку при работе с тревожными расстройствами. Техника «Улитка» помогает сместить фокус с тревожного потока на телесно…
❤5🔥3custom 54697440638151029062👍1
💭 5 привычных фраз, которые разрушают контакт с клиентом В терапии важна каждая деталь. Одно неточное слово или несвоевременный вопрос — и клиент замыкается в себе, чувствуя обесценивание вместо поддержки. Даже самые правильные техники не работают, если нарушен контекст их применения. Как филигранно выстроить точный терапевтический диалог и избежать скрытых ловушек в коммуникации? 🙋 Разбираемся вместе с Александро…
❤6🔥3👍2
⚡️ Итоги июля в ИППСИ: старты групп, выпускные и новые форматы Июль в Институте практической психологии ИППСИ получился насыщенным и продуктивным. Подводим итоги месяца и делимся главными событиями! Успешно стартовали новые учебные группы: 🧑🎓 Программа профессиональной переподготовки «Профессия психолог-консультант». 🧑🎓 Курс повышения квалификации «ОРКТ в работе с парами и семьями». Празднуем выпускной! В этом…
❤5👍4🔥4
🛠 Как перестать тратить силы на борьбу с тревогой? Техника КПТ 3-ей волны от Ильи Розова Помните наш грандиозный «Конкурс когнитивной красоты», где представители 5 ведущих направлений терапии сошлись в интеллектуальном батле? Во 2-м этапе — «конкурсе талантов» — эксперты демонстрировали фирменные техники каждого подхода. В этом видео вас ждет практический фрагмент выступления Ильи Розова, представителя ТПО (Терапии…
❤8🔥7👍3💯2
Институт Практической Психологии ИППСИ pinned a photo
🗓 Расписание свободных окон для встреч с психологами: 3-9 августа В суете будней мы часто перестаём слышать собственные чувства, откладываем важные вопросы на потом и привыкаем справляться в одиночку. Но когда тревога, усталость или апатия становятся постоянными спутниками, очень важно вовремя остановиться и обратиться за поддержкой. На этой неделе у нас открыты окна для консультаций с психологами нашей Службы. 🛡…
❤3👍2🔥2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ippsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 125,456 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Институт Практической Психологии ИППСИ” (@ippsy), 2,675 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ippsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.