Channel
@inn_bakery
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,760subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001553976339 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inn_bakery |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inn_bakery |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 5,760 | +57 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 5,703 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 5,713 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 5,718 | -2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 5,720 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:33 | 5,721 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:09 | 5,722 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 5,723 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 5,724 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 5,728 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 5,724 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 5,727 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 5,726 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 5,732 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 5,732 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
131 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 71 | 54.2% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 29.0% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 6.11% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 5.34% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.29% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.763% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда меня спрашивают, сколько времени уходит на создание нового десерта. Если честно, гораздо больше, чем кажется. Потому что сначала рождается не рецепт. Сначала появляется идея. На днях мы отдыхали в усадьбе Скорняково-Архангельское и я снова поймала себя на мысли, что мне очень интересно наблюдать, как из множества деталей складывается единая история. В интерьере это дерево, текстиль, посуда, свет. В десерте …
🔥9❤2
Я официально поступила в магистратуру. Если честно, когда несколько дней назад я написала пост о том, что снова становлюсь студенткой, даже не ожидала получить столько теплых слов поддержки. Спасибо каждому! ❤️ Вчера был вступительный экзамен. И результат — 100 баллов из 100 возможных. Но сейчас мне хочется сказать не о самой оценке. Я снова убедилась в одной простой мысли. Настоящий преподаватель никогда не пер…
🔥15👏6👍3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2🥰1😘1
Завтра у меня консультация в университете, а уже в четверг — вступительный экзамен в магистратуру. Если честно, немного волнуюсь. 😊 И знаете, какой вопрос я слышу чаще всего? «Инна, а зачем тебе снова учиться? Ты же уже столько лет преподаёшь.» Наверное, именно поэтому и иду. Чем больше я обучаю кондитеров, тем больше понимаю, что знания не стоят на месте. Меняются технологии, меняются подходы к обучению, появля…
🔥6❤4👏2
☕️ Кофейная карамель (рецепт) Ингредиенты: сахар — 50 г глюкозный сироп — 20 г сливки — 50 г эспрессо — 15 г сливочное масло — 25 г Приготовление: Сахар вместе с глюкозным сиропом растопите до красивого золотисто-карамельного цвета. Отдельно нагрейте сливки почти до кипения и соедините их с эспрессо. Горячую сливочно-кофейную смесь постепенно введите в карамель, постоянно перемешивая. Проварите около минуты до пол…
🔥17👍2
Корпусное пирожное «Кофе» ☕🤎 Тонкий хрустящий шоколадный корпус, нежный кофейный ганаш, тягучая карамель и шоколадно-миндальный бисквит — сочетание, которое работает безупречно. В хорошем десерте всё начинается с качества ингредиентов. Можно выбрать дорогой шоколад, хороший миндаль, настоящий кофе. Но если основа — сливки — работают нестабильно, идеальной текстуры уже не получится. Именно поэтому в своих десертах я…
🔥22❤3
Друзья, вернувшись из отпуска, вдохновленная и зараженная приготовила такую вкусняшку 🔥 Да, всем любителям кофе посвящается! Корпусное пирожное «Кофе» в моем авторском прочтении. Это ооочень вкусно 🤤 В видео подхватила ТРЕНД и решила похрустеть))) Буду рада вашим реакциям ❤️
❤16🔥2😘2🥰1
Иногда лучший способ двигаться вперед — это остановиться. Почти две недели меня не было в социальных сетях. И это было абсолютно осознанное решение. Мы всей семьёй уехали в Дагомыс. Море, горы, свежий воздух, долгие прогулки, разговоры без спешки и ощущение, что время наконец-то перестало бежать. Наверное, раньше я бы чувствовала тревогу. Ведь нужно что-то выложить, быть в ленте, не выпадать. А сейчас впервые пойм…
❤11👍2🤗1🥰1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @inn_bakery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа Кондитеров INNBAKERY | Инна Баранникова” (@inn_bakery), 5,760 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inn_bakery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.