Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OUI - Initiative intégrité physique et psychique - 9 juin 2024

Channel

OUI - Initiative intégrité physique et psychique - 9 juin 2024

@initiative_integrite_oui

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040340730
TypeChannel
Username@initiative_integrite_oui
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 6 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/initiative_integrite_oui

Growth

485149.58 August 2026 — 51 subscribers10 August 2026 — 51 subscribers16 August 2026 — 50 subscribers23 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 September 2026 — 48 subscribers8 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 00:1848-1
23 Aug 2026, 21:0949-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:1350-1
10 Aug 2026, 10:4651no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:2851first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 13m
Average length
9m 13s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2330.7%
👍1824.0%
👏1013.3%
🙏912.0%
😁79.33%
🤬34.00%
👎22.67%
🔥22.67%
💊11.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2024 to 8 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2024, 20:48 UTC510 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Bon ... croisons les doigts pour demain 🤞

🙏41

8 Jun 2024, 16:49 UTC520 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://www.lematin.ch/story/votations-federales-du-9-juin-participez-a-notre-grand-sondage-post-votations-103120691

31 May 2024, 15:08 UTC520 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @resilientstvchannel

😡😡🤬Editorial en vidéo. La RTS fait campagne CONTRE l'initiative pour l'intégrité physique, en jouant sur la peur; et ce n'est pas ce qui est attendu de la part d'un service public qui a déjà été condamné par le Tribunal Fédéral pour sa partialité sur ce même sujet par le passé. Je prends le temps d'expliquer ici pourquoi, et je présente aussi les véritables motivations des initiants, et les vraies conséquences d'un

👍6

30 May 2024, 11:33 UTC828 viewsread 10 August 2026

Nadine Zmoos défend avec brio notre projet d'initiative. Clou du spectacle: lorsque l'opposant affirme qu'en cas d'obligation vaccinale, personne ne sera viré, alors que Nadine Zmoos vient d'évoquer le licenciement de 150 employés de SWISS durant la pandémie (même possible sans obligation vaccinale étatique!). Merci au TEMPS pour cette contribution ❤️ https://www.letemps.ch/videos/actualite/en-video-pour-ou-contre

28 May 2024, 14:10 UTC≈3,780 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Le journal du OUI au format digital, à diffuser un max ! Visionneuse sympa : https://www.flyer-ueberall.ch/epaper/epaper-Abstimmungsz-Unvers-FR/#8 PDF : https://www.flyer-ueberall.ch/epaper/epaper-Abstimmungsz-Unvers-FR/epaper/ausgabe.pdf www.initiative-integrite.ch

2

28 May 2024, 13:30 UTC≈3,920 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Le 19h30 a-t-il pris parti pour le NON à l'initiative pour l'intégrité physique du 9 juin 2024 ? Dans un sujet supposé présenter l'initiative pour l'intégrité physique en votation le 9 juin, la RTS a martelé les arguments trompeurs des opposants sans même évoquer les arguments en faveur du OUI, qui eux se basent sur l'expérience concrète des dérives de la période Covid, ni même présenter le texte d'initiative et nos

🤬3👍1

27 May 2024, 12:29 UTC≈3,390 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Conférence de presse pour le lancement de la campagne du OUI, le 7 mai 2024 au Centre média de la Confédération à Berne, Charly Pache, co-initiant. www.initiative-integrite.ch

👏4🔥1

26 May 2024, 12:45 UTC934 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Marianne Dind, juriste, explique pourquoi elle va voter OUI à l’initiative pour renforcer l’intégrité physique le 9 juin prochain. Tous nos arguments aussi sur www.initiative-integrite.ch

4

25 May 2024, 15:55 UTC230 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Voici le "kit" pour l'intervention du Dr Saegesser: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRx45rY9VHU X: https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1794014469565120774 Telegram: https://t.me/resilientstvchannel/91

5👍2

21 May 2024, 15:49 UTC173 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🔴INITIATIVE INTÉGRITÉ: LE 9JUIN , DISONS UN GRAND OUI!

5

21 May 2024, 11:41 UTC200 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @RaLibr

VOTATION DU 9 JUIN, COMMENT FAIRE POUR TOUT COMPRENDRE? Petite vidéo humoristique présentant une méthode « sûre et efficace » pour savoir comment voter le 9 juin 2024. ▶️ https://radiolibre.ch/qtvideo/votation-9-juin-tout-comprendre/ App Android | Newsletter | Soutenir

😁7👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @initiative_integrite_oui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OUI - Initiative intégrité physique et psychique - 9 juin 2024” (@initiative_integrite_oui), 48 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/initiative_integrite_oui.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.