Bon ... croisons les doigts pour demain 🤞
🙏4❤1

Channel
@initiative_integrite_oui
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002040340730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @initiative_integrite_oui |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 6 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/initiative_integrite_oui |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 48 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 49 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 50 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 51 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 51 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 30.7% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 24.0% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 13.3% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2024 to 8 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bon ... croisons les doigts pour demain 🤞
🙏4❤1
https://www.lematin.ch/story/votations-federales-du-9-juin-participez-a-notre-grand-sondage-post-votations-103120691
😡😡🤬Editorial en vidéo. La RTS fait campagne CONTRE l'initiative pour l'intégrité physique, en jouant sur la peur; et ce n'est pas ce qui est attendu de la part d'un service public qui a déjà été condamné par le Tribunal Fédéral pour sa partialité sur ce même sujet par le passé. Je prends le temps d'expliquer ici pourquoi, et je présente aussi les véritables motivations des initiants, et les vraies conséquences d'un…
👍6
Nadine Zmoos défend avec brio notre projet d'initiative. Clou du spectacle: lorsque l'opposant affirme qu'en cas d'obligation vaccinale, personne ne sera viré, alors que Nadine Zmoos vient d'évoquer le licenciement de 150 employés de SWISS durant la pandémie (même possible sans obligation vaccinale étatique!). Merci au TEMPS pour cette contribution ❤️ https://www.letemps.ch/videos/actualite/en-video-pour-ou-contre…
Video, posted without a caption
❤2
Le journal du OUI au format digital, à diffuser un max ! Visionneuse sympa : https://www.flyer-ueberall.ch/epaper/epaper-Abstimmungsz-Unvers-FR/#8 PDF : https://www.flyer-ueberall.ch/epaper/epaper-Abstimmungsz-Unvers-FR/epaper/ausgabe.pdf www.initiative-integrite.ch
❤2
Le 19h30 a-t-il pris parti pour le NON à l'initiative pour l'intégrité physique du 9 juin 2024 ? Dans un sujet supposé présenter l'initiative pour l'intégrité physique en votation le 9 juin, la RTS a martelé les arguments trompeurs des opposants sans même évoquer les arguments en faveur du OUI, qui eux se basent sur l'expérience concrète des dérives de la période Covid, ni même présenter le texte d'initiative et nos…
🤬3👍1
Conférence de presse pour le lancement de la campagne du OUI, le 7 mai 2024 au Centre média de la Confédération à Berne, Charly Pache, co-initiant. www.initiative-integrite.ch
👏4🔥1
Marianne Dind, juriste, explique pourquoi elle va voter OUI à l’initiative pour renforcer l’intégrité physique le 9 juin prochain. Tous nos arguments aussi sur www.initiative-integrite.ch
❤4
Voici le "kit" pour l'intervention du Dr Saegesser: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRx45rY9VHU X: https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1794014469565120774 Telegram: https://t.me/resilientstvchannel/91
❤5👍2
🔴INITIATIVE INTÉGRITÉ: LE 9JUIN , DISONS UN GRAND OUI!
❤5
VOTATION DU 9 JUIN, COMMENT FAIRE POUR TOUT COMPRENDRE? Petite vidéo humoristique présentant une méthode « sûre et efficace » pour savoir comment voter le 9 juin 2024. ▶️ https://radiolibre.ch/qtvideo/votation-9-juin-tout-comprendre/ App Android | Newsletter | Soutenir
😁7👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @initiative_integrite_oui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OUI - Initiative intégrité physique et psychique - 9 juin 2024” (@initiative_integrite_oui), 48 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/initiative_integrite_oui.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.