Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝔖𝐻𝐼𝑀𝑀€𝑅𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝐹𝐿𝟏𝑅𝑇𝟏𝑁𝐺

@PPark1ns

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

151subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003828597322
TypeChannel
Username@PPark1ns
Description𝐴𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑒 è 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑒, 𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐ℎé 𝑠𝑖 𝑎𝑚𝑎 è 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑒. 🖤𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒(𝑙𝑜𝑣𝑒): @TH0M1EOCT 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑜(𝑜𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑟): пенсия
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/PPark1ns

Growth

15111 Aug 2026, 10:54 — 151 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:01 — 151 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 10:5411 Aug 2026, 11:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 150–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:01151no change
11 Aug 2026, 10:54151first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
188.7%
avg views ÷ 151 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held10 (5 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total1,995
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Links
11

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

167 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52784256819176730922917.4%
custom 52471550429427468382615.6%
custom 52761122922729600082414.4%
custom 54269275047765228522414.4%
custom 5190890623472786416158.98%
custom 5452044340379550409148.38%
custom 5246746432639106966137.78%
custom 5276379550907922999116.59%
custom 5427125532833641644116.59%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @scarlettblackwoodsPhoto

🖤ˏˋ ┈─𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐍 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄. 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝗒𝗈𝗎:: • Репост на свой дневник. (Для охвата) • Подписка. (Без отписок после) • Ссылка на дневник. 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖾:: • Ваш канал простыми:: да, нет, возможно. (Без объяснений почему) ┈─> 𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐍.

2 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC270 views43 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤ith: my favorite girl 🔤Присутствуют отклонения от канона. написанное может отличаться от канона персонажей или дневников. создано исключительно в юмористических целях.🔤 #connection #messager

custom 542692750477652285213custom 524715504294274683811custom 52784256819176730929custom 51908906234727864165custom 54271255328336416443custom 52467464326391069661custom 52761122922729600081

20 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC492 views51 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤ne for the road, ooh ooh One for the road, ooh ooh 🔤rom the bottom of your heart, the relegation zone I saw this coming from the start The shake rattle and roll The cracks in blackout blinds cast patterns on the ceiling But you're feeling fine I thought it was dark outside I thought it was dark outside 🔤ne for the road So we all get back to yours and you sit and talk to me on the floor There's no need to show me r

custom 524715504294274683813custom 54269275047765228529custom 54520443403795504099custom 51908906234727864166custom 54271255328336416445custom 52467464326391069664custom 52784256819176730923custom 52761122922729600082

19 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC391 views39 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🔤ith: my love boyfriend 🔤Присутствуют отклонения от канона. написанное может отличаться от канона персонажей или дневников. создано исключительно в юмористических целях.🔤 #lover #messager

custom 52761122922729600089custom 52784256819176730929custom 52467464326391069668custom 54520443403795504094custom 51908906234727864163custom 54271255328336416443custom 54269275047765228522custom 52471550429427468381

5 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC556 views34 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🔡 🔡🔡🔡🔡 🐾Когда я умру, вспомни меня, когда почувствуешь аромат цветочных духов 🐾Когда я умру, вспомни меня в сообщениях, написанных с ошибками и капсом 🐾Когда я умру, вспомни мои частые, иногда глупые голосовые в разное время 🐾Когда я умру, вспомни меня в любви к путешествиям и воспоминаниям 🐾Когда я умру, вспомни меня, когда будешь смотреть "Чёрная весна", "Фишер", "Пророк. История Александр

custom 527611229227296000812custom 527637955090792299911custom 52784256819176730928custom 51908906234727864161custom 52471550429427468381custom 54520443403795504091

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @PPark1ns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 468,463 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝔖𝐻𝐼𝑀𝑀€𝑅𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝐹𝐿𝟏𝑅𝑇𝟏𝑁𝐺” (@PPark1ns), 151 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PPark1ns.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.