хаха доброе утро, уже как почти год чат закрыт, но у меня взяли интервью, почитайте и поставьте реакции понятно

Channel
𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎 𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐒𝐅𝐀𝐌🫒#инвалидыоливок
@infoolives
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001663342314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infoolives |
| Description | ➷ ⲃⲗⲁⲇⲉⲗⲉц – @karina_qn ➷ ⲗⲁύⲫ – @lifeolives ➷ ⲡυⲁⲣ ⳡⲁⲧ – @piarolives ᴨᴩиʍᴇʍ ʙ ᴄᴇʍью ᴋᴀждᴏᴦᴏ.💋 |
| Created | 10 April 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infoolives |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 64 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 64 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 6
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 01s
- Average length
- 40s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🍪 ›› 𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 ⟡ · ⊹ . ° ୨୧ ◌ ゚ . ⊹ ⟡ 💌 `` ᴄᴇᴦᴏдня я ʙɜяᴧᴀ инᴛᴇᴩʙью у ɜᴀʍᴇчᴀᴛᴇᴧьнᴏй ᴋᴀᴩины. ᴋᴏᴩᴩᴇᴄᴨᴏндᴇнᴛ ᴦᴏᴄᴛь «ᴦᴏᴄᴛья ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜᴀᴧᴀ нᴀʍ нᴇʍнᴏᴦᴏ ᴏ ᴄʙᴏᴇй жиɜни, ᴏ ᴛᴏʍ ᴋᴀᴋ ᴏнᴀ нᴇ ʍᴇняᴧᴀ ᴩᴏᴧь нᴇᴄᴋᴏᴧьᴋᴏ ᴧᴇᴛ и чуʙᴄᴛʙуᴇᴛ ᴧи ᴏнᴀ ᴄᴇбя ᴄчᴀᴄᴛᴧиʙыʍ чᴇᴧᴏʙᴇᴋᴏʍ». ᴨᴩияᴛнᴏᴦᴏ чᴛᴇния. 🫶🏻
> > 🫒ʙᴄᴇʍ ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴛиᴋ! нᴀʙᴇᴩнᴏᴇ, ʙы ɜᴀʍᴇᴛиᴧи нᴀɯу нᴇᴀᴋᴛиʙнᴏᴄᴛь, ᴋ ᴄᴏжᴀᴧᴇнию.🥺 — у ᴀдʍинᴏʙ ᴧичнᴀя жиɜнь, учᴇбᴀ, ᴩᴀбᴏᴛᴀ, ᴋᴀᴩьᴇᴩᴀ и я ᴄᴀʍᴀ ᴨᴏᴛᴇᴩяᴧᴀ ᴄʍыᴄᴧ ʙ ᴨᴏиᴄᴋᴇ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ ʙ чᴀᴛ ᴩᴀди ᴏбщᴇния, ᴨᴏᴛᴏʍу чᴛᴏ у ʍᴇня и ᴛᴀᴋ ужᴇ ᴇᴄᴛь ᴨᴩᴇᴋᴩᴀᴄный ᴋᴩуᴦ ᴏбщᴇния ʙ ᴏᴧиʙᴋᴀх, ᴄ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыʍ я хᴏчу ᴏбщᴀᴛьᴄя ʙ дᴀᴧьнᴇйɯᴇʍ. 🪄ʍы нᴇ ɜᴀᴋᴩыʙᴀᴇʍ чᴀᴛ, ʍы ɜᴀᴋᴩыʙᴀᴇʍ ᴇᴦᴏ дᴧя нᴏʙᴇньᴋих. ʙᴄᴇ ᴏᴧды, иᴧи ᴧюдᴇй, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩых я ɜнᴀю, ʍᴏᴦуᴛ ɜᴀйᴛи ᴄʙᴏбᴏднᴏ ʙ ᴏᴧиʙᴋи бᴇ…
❗️ВНИМАНИЕ❗️ – ᴨᴏ ᴨᴏʙᴏду ʙᴄᴛуᴨᴧᴇния ʙ чᴀᴛ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА ᴨиɯиᴛᴇ нᴇ ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧьцу, ᴀ ᴀдʍинᴀʍ. 💚
— надеюсь на вас и ваши голоса за нас, мы будем очень благодарны.💚 https://t.me/boost/infoolives
📌ʙᴄᴇ, чᴛᴏ ᴛᴇбя инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄуᴇᴛ, ᴛы ʍᴏжᴇɯь нᴀйᴛи ᴨᴏ ϶ᴛиʍ ᴄᴄыᴧᴋᴀʍ. > ᴀдʍинᴄы, ᴋᴏʍу ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь. > ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧᴀ. > ᴄᴨиᴄᴏᴋ ɜᴀняᴛых ᴩᴏᴧᴇй. > ᴄᴨиᴄᴏᴋ днᴇй ᴩᴏждᴇний. > ᴄᴨиᴄᴏᴋ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴏʙ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ. > инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙы и ʍнᴏᴦᴏᴇ дᴩуᴦᴏᴇ. > пост для тех, у кого бан. > пригласительный пост.
🌿ᴋᴀᴩиɯᴀ — ʙᴧᴀдᴇᴧᴇц ᴏᴧиʙᴏᴋ. ᴨᴏ ᴨᴏʙᴏду ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄᴏʙ ᴏ чᴀᴛᴇ, ᴄʍᴇны ᴩᴏᴧи ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ᴇй. >чиᴄᴛᴋᴀ >ʙᴧиʙᴀниᴇ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ >ᴏɸᴏᴩʍᴧᴇниᴇ, ᴄᴨиᴄᴋи >ᴀдʍинᴋи ʙ ᴧᴀйɸᴇ и ᴨч >инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙы 🌿юᴧя – ᴀдʍин ᴏᴧиʙᴏᴋ. ᴨᴏ ᴨᴏʙᴏду ʙᴄᴛуᴨᴧᴇния, нᴇᴀᴋᴛиʙᴀ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ᴇй. >ᴨᴏдняᴛиᴇ ᴀᴋᴛиʙᴀ >ʙᴧиʙᴀниᴇ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ >ᴨᴏиᴄᴋ учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ >ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇᴩᴋᴀ ниᴋᴀ и ᴄʍᴀйᴧᴀ. >иᴦᴩы, инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙы 🌿ʙиᴋᴀ – ʍᴧᴀдɯий ᴀдʍин, ᴨᴏ ᴨᴏʙᴏду нᴀᴄᴛᴩᴏᴇния и ᴨᴩᴏбᴧᴇʍ ᴏᴛʍᴇчᴀᴛь ᴇᴇ. >ᴨᴏдняᴛиᴇ ᴀᴋᴛиʙᴀ >ʙᴧиʙᴀниᴇ …
ᴨᴏᴄᴛ дᴧя ᴧюдᴇй, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыᴇ ᴨᴏɜнᴀᴧи яᴩᴏᴄᴛь ᴧюдᴇй и ᴨᴏᴧучиᴧи бᴀн. 😭 — нᴀᴨиɯиᴛᴇ «+» и ᴀдʍиниᴄᴛᴩᴀция ᴄʙяжᴇᴛᴄя ᴄ ʙᴀʍи ʙ бᴧижᴀйɯᴇᴇ ʙᴩᴇʍя.💗
– ᴋᴀнᴀᴧы нᴀɯих учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ.💚 :: с материалом⤵️ :: личные ⤵️ › 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐚 𝐠𝐢𝐥𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐭. — @krsalv › 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐛𝐞𝐬. — @olivkinavishny › 𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐞. — @wsliaa › 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐥 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐥. — @aida_daz › 𝐤𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐞. — @piercehelp › 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬. — @nixwsqqlife › 𝐤𝐚𝐭𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧. — @rsvtqlt ❓ᴇᴄᴧи ᴛʙᴏᴇᴦᴏ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴀ ɜдᴇᴄь нᴇᴛ, ᴏᴛᴨᴩᴀʙь ᴇᴦᴏ ʙ ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩиях.
● • ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ ᴄ инᴛᴇᴩʙью :: иᴦᴩᴀʍи :: ᴛᴇʍᴀᴛичᴇᴄᴋиʍи дняʍи.🎀 ᴨᴏдᴨиᴄыʙᴀйᴛᴇᴄь, чᴛᴏ бы нᴇ ᴨᴩᴏᴨуᴄᴛиᴛь ᴄᴀʍᴏᴇ инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄнᴏᴇ.💋 ➡️ @interoliv
❗️ᴨᴩᴏɯу ᴏɜнᴀᴋᴏʍиᴛьᴄя ᴄ ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧᴀʍи, ᴨᴩᴇждᴇ чᴇʍ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ᴏ ʙᴄᴛуᴨᴧᴇнии.❗️ нᴇ ᴛᴩᴀᴛьᴛᴇ ᴄʙᴏᴇ ʙᴩᴇʍя и ʙᴩᴇʍя ᴀдʍинᴏʙ. 🦋пᴩᴀʙиᴧᴀ дᴧя ʙᴄᴛуᴨᴧᴇния : 𝟏. у нᴀᴄ ᴩᴀɜᴩᴇɯᴀᴇᴛᴄя дʙᴀ ниᴋᴀ, нᴀɯ нᴀ 1 ʍᴇᴄᴛᴇ обязательно нужен. 𝟐. ᴏбяɜᴀᴛᴇᴧьнᴏ ᴄᴩᴀɜу ᴨᴩиᴄыᴧᴀйᴛᴇ иʍя и ɸᴀʍиᴧию ʙᴀɯᴇᴦᴏ ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжᴀ нᴀ ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋᴏʍ яɜыᴋᴇ ᴄ ʍᴀᴧᴇньᴋᴏй буᴋʙы. 𝟑. ᴄʍᴀйᴧ нᴀ 1-3 ʍᴇᴄᴛᴏ, ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇ ᴛᴏᴦᴏ ᴋᴀᴋ ʍы дᴏᴦᴏʙᴏᴩиᴧиᴄь ᴏ ʙᴄᴛуᴨᴧᴇнии. 𝟒. ʍы ᴛᴀᴋ жᴇ ʍᴏжᴇʍ нᴇ ᴨᴩиняᴛь ʙᴀᴄ ᴨᴏ ᴧичныʍ ᴏбᴄᴛᴏяᴛ…
🎀— МЫ КЕМБЕК🫒. #OLIVIKI <3 ʙᴄᴇʍ ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴛ, и ᴏᴧиʙᴋи, ᴋᴀᴋ ᴛᴏᴛ ᴄᴀʍый быʙɯий, ʙнᴏʙь ʙᴏɜʙᴩᴀщᴀюᴛᴄя ᴋ ʙᴀʍ ʙ нᴏʙᴏʍ ɸᴏᴩʍᴀᴛᴇ. ᴄᴇᴦᴏдня, 23 ɸᴇʙᴩᴀᴧя, ʍᴏй дᴇнь ᴩᴏждᴇния и я ᴏбъяʙᴧяю чᴛᴏ нᴀбᴏᴩ ʙ ᴏᴧиʙᴋи ᴏᴛᴋᴩыᴛ!🩷 ~ чᴛᴏ ʙᴀᴄ будᴇᴛ ждᴀᴛь ʙ чᴀᴛᴇ? •ᴨᴩᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩ ɸиᴧьʍᴏʙ; •ᴇжᴇнᴇдᴇᴧьныᴇ инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙы; •ᴇжᴇднᴇʙныᴇ и ᴇжᴇʍᴇᴄячныᴇ ᴦᴏᴩᴏᴄᴋᴏᴨы; •ᴇжᴇднᴇʙный ᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄниᴋ ᴄ уᴋᴧᴏнᴏʍ нᴀ ᴀнᴦᴧийᴄᴋий яɜыᴋ; •ᴨᴏддᴇᴩжᴋᴀ и наша ᴏᴦᴩᴏʍнᴀя ᴄᴇʍья; •ᴋᴀниᴋуᴧы ᴏᴛ нᴏᴩʍы и ʍнᴏᴦᴏ д…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @infoolives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 541,484 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@infoolives named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐈𝐍𝐅𝐎 𝐎𝐋𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐒𝐅𝐀𝐌🫒#инвалидыоливок” (@infoolives), 64 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infoolives.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.