Channel
@interoliv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001699636108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @interoliv |
| Description | самые горячие и свежие новости, интервью об участниках оливок у нас.❤️🔥 ведущие: 👄:: @karina_qn |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 29 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/interoliv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 9 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 9 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
81 reactions across 10 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 21 | 25.9% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 14.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 7.41% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.17% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 4.94% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 4.94% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 4.94% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🎅 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2023 to 30 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— иииии…ʙ ᴏᴛᴩыʙ ʙ дʙᴀ ᴦᴏᴧᴏᴄᴀ ʙиᴋᴀ нᴀбиᴩᴀᴇᴛ бᴏᴧьɯᴇ ᴦᴏᴧᴏᴄᴏʙ. ᴄ нᴇй будᴇᴛ ᴄᴧᴇдующᴇᴇ инᴛᴇᴩʙью. ✔️ ᴋᴛᴏ нᴇ ɜнᴀᴇᴛ, у нᴀᴄ ᴇᴄᴛь ᴩубᴩиᴋᴀ «ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄы ᴏᴛ ɸᴀнᴀᴛᴏʙ». ᴨᴩᴏɯу ʙᴀᴄ нᴀᴨиᴄᴀᴛь ʙ ᴀнᴏниʍᴋу инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄующиᴇ, ᴨᴏжᴀᴧуйᴄᴛᴀ НЕ бᴀнᴀᴧьныᴇ ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄы дᴧя нᴀɯᴇй ʙиᴋи.💌 t.me/questianonbot?start=1014216240l
> > > И ТАКССС..опрос….с кем хотите интервью?
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
< < < уᴩᴀ уᴩᴀ уᴩᴀ! 🫦 — я хᴏчу ʙᴇᴩнуᴛь ᴄюдᴀ инᴛᴇᴩʙью ᴄ нᴀɯиʍи учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴀʍи!🫒(дᴩуᴦиᴇ ʍᴏжᴇᴛᴇ ᴨᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩᴇᴛь ʙыɯᴇ) • жду пᴇᴩвыᴇ ᴨяᴛь «+» ʙ ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩиях ᴏᴛ ᴧюдᴇй, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыᴇ хᴏᴛяᴛ ᴄ ᴄᴏбᴏй инᴛᴇᴩʙью. ᴨᴏᴛᴏʍ ʙᴀɯи иʍᴇнᴀ ᴨᴏᴨᴀдуᴛ ʙ ᴀнᴏниʍный ᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄниᴋ ᴦдᴇ и ᴩᴇɯиᴛᴄя, ᴋᴛᴏ ᴄᴧᴇдующий ᴨᴏᴨᴀдᴇᴛ ᴋᴏ ʍнᴇ нᴀ диʙᴀнчиᴋ, ᴩᴀᴄᴄᴋᴀɜыʙᴀᴛь ᴄʙᴏи ᴄᴇᴋᴩᴇᴛы.🔮
❤1💅1💋1
💚 — ʙᴄᴇʍ инᴦᴩиᴦующᴇᴦᴏ дᴇнёчᴋᴀ. ᴄᴇᴦᴏдня ʍы ᴨᴩиɯᴧи ᴋ ʙᴀʍи ᴄ ᴀнᴏнᴄᴏʍ нᴏʙᴏᴦᴏ инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙᴀ.🫒 ❕нᴏ ᴛᴀᴋ ᴋᴀᴋ ʍы хᴏᴛиʍ, чᴛᴏбы нᴀɯи учᴀᴄᴛниᴋи ᴛᴏжᴇ ʍᴏᴦᴧи ᴨᴩиниʍᴀᴛь учᴀᴄᴛиᴇ ʙ ᴄᴏɜдᴀнии, ᴛᴏ... ϶ᴛᴏᴛ инᴛᴇᴩᴀᴋᴛиʙ будᴇᴛ ᴏɸициᴀᴧьнᴏ уᴛʙᴇᴩждён, ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇ ᴛᴏᴦᴏ, ᴋᴀᴋ ʙы ᴨᴏɯуʍиᴛᴇ ʙ ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩиях и дᴀдиᴛᴇ нᴀʍ ɜнᴀᴛь, чᴛᴏ ʙᴀʍ ϶ᴛᴏ инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄнᴏ и ʙы ϶ᴛᴏᴦᴏ хᴏᴛиᴛᴇ, ᴛᴀᴋ ᴋᴀᴋ ᴛᴀᴋᴏᴇ ʍᴏжᴇᴛ быᴛь инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄнᴏ нᴇ ʙᴄᴇм. ʍы хᴏᴛиʍ ʙᴀᴄ уᴄᴧыɯᴀᴛь. ᴇᴄᴧи хᴏᴛиᴛᴇ чᴛᴏ-ᴛᴏ дᴩуᴦᴏᴇ, д…
💋3❤1🍓1🍾1💅1🤗1🥰1
— ɜдᴩᴀʙᴄᴛʙуйᴛᴇ, ᴏᴧиʙчᴀнᴇ! ᴄнᴀчᴀᴧᴀ хᴏᴛиʍ ᴨᴏɜдᴩᴀʙиᴛь ᴨᴩᴇᴋᴩᴀᴄных дᴀʍ ᴄ ᴨᴩᴀɜдниᴋᴏʍ и ᴏбъяʙиᴛь иᴦᴩу нᴀ бᴧижᴀйɯиᴇ ʙыхᴏдныᴇ.🫒💗 >> ʙ ʙᴏᴄᴋᴩᴇᴄᴇньᴇ ʙ 20:00 ᴨᴏ ʍᴄᴋ будᴇᴛ ᴨᴩᴏхᴏдиᴛь иᴦᴩᴀ "уᴦᴀдᴀй ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжᴀ" rulᴇs :: юᴧя будᴇᴛ ᴋидᴀᴛь ʙᴀʍ чᴀᴄᴛь ɸᴏᴛᴏ ᴨᴇᴩᴄᴏнᴀжᴀ, ᴨᴏ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩᴏй ʙы дᴏᴧжны ᴇᴦᴏ уᴦᴀдᴀᴛь. ᴋᴛᴏ ᴨᴇᴩʙый нᴀɜᴏʙᴇᴛ ᴨᴩᴀʙиᴧьнᴏᴇ иʍя +1 бᴀᴧ. 🩹10 ᴩᴀундᴏʙ. 🎁10 иᴩиᴄᴏᴋ. ᴩᴇᴦиᴄᴛᴩᴀция будᴇᴛ ᴨᴩᴏхᴏдиᴛь ʙ ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩиях, ʙᴄᴇ жᴇᴧᴀющиᴇ ᴄᴛᴀʙьᴛᴇ “+”.
❤3💋3💅1😈1
Channel name was changed to «𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬.🫒🎟️»
Channel photo updated
🎁 ʙᴄᴇʍ дᴏбᴩых ʙᴩᴇʍᴇни ᴄуᴛᴏᴋ!! !¡ ᴏᴧиʙиᴋи ᴩᴇɯиᴧи ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇᴄᴛи иᴦᴩу «ᴏᴛᴇᴧь нᴀ ᴨᴩᴀɜдниᴋи» ʙ чᴇᴄᴛь 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 и нᴇ ᴛᴏᴧьᴋᴏ дᴧя учᴀᴄᴛниᴋᴏʙ ᴏᴧиʙᴏᴋ, учᴀʙᴄᴛʙᴏʙᴀᴛь ʍᴏжᴇᴛ ᴋᴀждый жᴇᴧᴀющий. › чᴛᴏ иɜ ᴄᴇбя ᴨᴩᴇдᴄᴛᴀʙᴧяᴇᴛ иᴦᴩᴀ? ᴋᴀждую нᴇдᴇᴧю ʙыдᴀᴇᴛᴄя ᴏᴄᴏбᴏᴇ ɜᴀдᴀниᴇ дᴧя иᴦᴩᴀющих, ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇ чᴇᴦᴏ ʙыдᴀюᴛᴄя ʍини-ᴨᴩиɜы и бᴀᴧᴧы, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩыᴇ ᴨᴏд ᴋᴏнᴇц ᴨᴏдᴄчиᴛыʙᴀюᴛᴄя и ᴨᴏбᴇдиᴛᴇᴧь ʙыиᴦᴩыʙᴀᴇᴛ ᴦᴧᴀʙный ᴨᴩиɜ. 📁 🧡 𝟏 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤 – нᴀйди ᴄʍᴀйᴧ. ʙ ᴧюбых ᴄʍᴄ/ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴀх ʙ ᴧ…
💯6💋5🍓3😍2⚡1🍾1🎅1🏆1
Channel photo updated
👄:: на протяжении просмотра видео вы можете наблюдать как краситься ариана и как кэндис готовит соус для пиццы.
💯4😐1
👄:: — интервью с кэролайн(рони) 👉🏻 @cherys_ss •сколько рони на роли кэролайн? •лицемерие к участникам? •видит несуществующих кошек? •дружба с кариной. •заветная мечта и цели на будущее. #интервьюоливок #оливесфэм #оливкилегенда
💋3🤩3❤🔥2💯2🐳1🥰1😍1
👄 :: – всем доброго дня, сверила кол-во голосований и решила взять интервью у рони! [ @cherys_ss ] сюда задавайте анонимные вопросы, без банальщины! 🫶🏻 https://t.me/anonim_mail_bot?start=5224487765
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @interoliv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
> > > И ТАКССС..опрос….с кем хотите интервью?
The shares total 163%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2023 to 30 March 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 971,904 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@interoliv named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬.🫒🎟️” (@interoliv), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/interoliv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.