Channel
@infolisu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003397020618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infolisu |
| Created | 8 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infolisu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 52 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 52 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 8 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (8 December 2025 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 692 |
| Reactions total | 127 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2,999 reactions across 13 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5242371145159705712 | 505 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5294089891502659992 | 336 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5271923994784725970 | 277 | 9.24% | |
| custom 5244649054079581849 | 220 | 7.34% | |
| custom 5465457218302275380 | 209 | 6.97% | |
| custom 5271515436020697205 | 194 | 6.47% | |
| custom 5242559393576291093 | 190 | 6.34% | |
| custom 5220195430146542654 | 181 | 6.04% | |
| custom 6172348379264194139 | 146 | 4.87% | |
| custom 6172327282384836441 | 123 | 4.10% | |
| ❤ | 97 | 3.23% | |
| custom 5217672523407201922 | 91 | 3.03% | |
| custom 5219820483796567324 | 90 | 3.00% | |
| custom 6224035510352877865 | 88 | 2.93% | |
| custom 5247008988284882164 | 84 | 2.80% | |
| custom 5377809477095423662 | 84 | 2.80% | |
| custom 5294540558126060482 | 33 | 1.10% | |
| custom 6190527708812810091 | 33 | 1.10% | |
| custom 5271521500514513027 | 18 | 0.6% |
Custom emoji. 18 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,999reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @infolisu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⠀⠀ ⩩ › WIN ﹠ @BESTIRL ⇉ 𝄒𓏏 главным ирл покемон! Безликий Бай становится . . . ⠀⠀↳ ⁝ @cre1mylisa набирая 3464 голоса ! ‹
custom 521767252340720192238custom 529408989150265999232custom 522019543014654265430custom 52198204837965673247custom 61723272823848364417custom 62240355103528778657custom 53778094770954236626
ℒa̫𝑛 𝒵𝒽a̰𝑛 🖤 f͟͟o͟͟r͟͟ m͟͟y͟͟ 𝒲e̫𝑖 𝒴𝑖𝑛g 🖤
custom 537780947709542366214custom 529408989150265999212custom 52198204837965673247custom 52176725234072019224custom 52201954301465426544custom 61723272823848364413
занятые юзы мной: @creamywei ࣪˖ ִֶָ⿻
custom 617232728238483644112custom 52176725234072019228custom 52198204837965673246custom 52201954301465426545custom 62240355103528778655custom 52940898915026599924
❌❌❌❌🌟🌟🌟
custom 5294089891502659992144custom 522019543014654265458custom 537780947709542366253custom 521767252340720192219custom 521982048379656732418custom 617232728238483644118custom 622403551035287786518
❌🎀lu𝗏. l𝗶𝗌ׄ𝘁 ⃘ ( повторный ) 🎀 🎀 @ лолита 🤍@. ᥴацɣⲙυ 𝇌@.ᥴυя𝇌 @ ოυц⍺𝇌 @ хикоми @ комори @ эскм @ гскм @ Ань чжэ @ шидзе кролики игры𓏏 друзей , 𝇌Японию дарить подарки 𝇌нфт сладости , выпечка 🎀 I don't like когда дружат из-за подарков , задевают как то , когда общаются как дети типо пливет и тд. люди меньше 11 𓏏 იᦅ𝞀яǥᦅк н𝗲 υო𝗲𝗲т зн⍺ч𝗲нυя 🥹о❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌🥹🥹
custom 522019543014654265480custom 622403551035287786553custom 617232728238483644151custom 529408989150265999215custom 521767252340720192211custom 521982048379656732411custom 537780947709542366211
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 6172348379264194139146custom 529408989150265999295custom 524700898828488216484custom 529454055812606048233custom 619052770881281009133custom 52176725234072019225custom 52198204837965673245custom 62240355103528778655
ᤐ᳢ჩִִꪮ̼ׄ 𐐼ִ᷼ꭉᧉִ͠ ყꪮ̼ׄ υִ᷼ 𝘵ꪮ̼ׄ ᧗ᤢׄᧉִ͠?🤩
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 521982048379656732436custom 529408989150265999229custom 617232728238483644127custom 52176725234072019226custom 52201954301465426544
❌❌🐏𝐈𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐓 🪻🪻 ❌🤩я нꫀ ບщꪗ ꬶթуვꫀύ , нꫀ ꪦບᤐບтꫀ ოнꫀ ꪦ𑄜 эт𑄜ოу ꪦ𑄜ϐ𑄜ꬶу ! 𝂅ׄ︶ִ𝆋፝֟ ͝ 𝗲ᴄꪒυ 𝕩ᦅтυт𝗲 იᦅᦅδщ⍺тьᴄя , ǥꪒя этᦅટᦅ 𝗲ᴄть ⍺нᦅн🐏🐏 тап ᰚ ˚̣̣̣.
custom 5242371145159705712130custom 524255939357629109371custom 524464905407958184967custom 527192399478472597030custom 527151543602069720529custom 546545721830227538029custom 52940898915026599925custom 61723272823848364415
🌟🌟🎀𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎𝗍🤩 🌟🌟🎀🤩🌟 𝗆𝖾🎀 🎀
custom 524237114515970571290custom 524464905407958184963custom 546545721830227538052custom 524255939357629109321custom 527151543602069720521custom 527192399478472597019
🌟🎀 𝓶𝗒 𝓼w𝖾𝖾𝗍 🎀𝗁𝗂𝗄𝗈𝗆𝑖 🎀 𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗌𝖺𝓼🎀🤩
custom 527192399478472597081custom 524237114515970571256custom 524464905407958184950custom 527151543602069720521custom 546545721830227538021custom 524255939357629109320
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 524237114515970571276custom 524255939357629109353custom 527151543602069720545custom 527192399478472597021custom 524464905407958184920custom 546545721830227538017
࣪˖ ִֶָ𝓘𓏻𝐰𝐚ꪀ𝐧ꪖ 𝐛ꫀ 𝐰𝓲𝐭𝓱 𝐲ꪮ𝓾 ꪖꪀ𝐝 𝐰ꪖ𝐬𝐭ꫀ 𝐦ꪗ 𝐭𝓲𝓶ꫀ ۫ ׅ @lanh1komi ⿻ 🪻🪻
❤75custom 524237114515970571272custom 527151543602069720555custom 524464905407958184920custom 546545721830227538019custom 527152150051451302718custom 527192399478472597017
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @infolisu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ᤐ᳢ჩִִꪮ̼ׄ 𐐼ִ᷼ꭉᧉִ͠ ყꪮ̼ׄ υִ᷼ 𝘵ꪮ̼ׄ ᧗ᤢׄᧉִ͠?🤩
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 924,418 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“͏ׅ ̣̣𝆭𝗆𝗈͟𝗈𝗻” (@infolisu), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infolisu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.