Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✿࣪་༘𝒜ٕ𝗌𝗍𝓻ٌ𐇽𖹭ۤ‌ ིི۪۪۫۫ 𝗄ࣰ𝗂𝗆𝑜⃪⃘ۣ๎𝗋𝗂 ‌‌᥀᥀ ‌‌ ‌

@evanakim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,393subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003716817727
TypeChannel
Username@evanakim
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 17 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/evanakim

Growth

1,3861,3931,389.57 August 2026 — 1,386 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,386 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,393 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,385–1,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:281,393+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:501,389+3
7 Aug 2026, 22:181,386no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:171,386first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.1%
avg views ÷ 1,393 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held18 (17 May 202627 July 2026)
Views total5,077
Reactions total249
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,722 reactions across 14 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.53% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52760625479617491062615.53%
custom 52832357016918163922555.40%
custom 52088255221376374802535.36%
custom 53616036162998517502385.04%
custom 52064533687503826142164.57%
custom 52765111186411108442144.53%
custom 52807830563224698632094.43%
custom 52652007689436974312064.36%
custom 52807389684831750862064.36%
custom 52490802491482845461833.88%
custom 52469490906709829231733.66%
custom 52492854455058196491673.54%
custom 53031693063375178141573.32%
custom 52153450634496319321553.28%
custom 52830882640544818951513.20%
custom 51589350703581119401402.96%
custom 52829473461774983121312.77%
custom 52854803117302527621312.77%
custom 53057944719532124401292.73%
custom 53056522355212705461252.65%
10 further kinds1,02221.6%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,722reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
413
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
44
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evanakim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC656 viewsread 7 August 2026

ладно если появится мотивация вести дальше канал , я буду ( процент маленький блин )..

27 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC781 views0 reactions16 Starsread 7 August 2026

всем привет ! важная новость , я бросаю этот канал и возможно ухожу из эскм , мне не приносит радость уже вот это все к сожалению ❤❤ наверное продам этот канал

15 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,840 views249 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌❌‌ུ🗝𝖾w #emo𝐣i 𝐟‌፝֟o𝚛 𝚢𝚘‌፝֟𝚞 #ююко #touhouproject 𝃣𝓠 ゙⃝🌟꒰⃪ۣ𓈒.᳕. ‌‌ࣰ፝֟‌꒱ۣᰰ⃪⃨‌‌ 🌟🌟🌟 ⋅ֻ֘ 𓈒𑪔 ࣪ ִ 🌟 𝆬ׄ ᭡ ꒰⃪ۣ𓈒۪‌⵿𑪍᳟ۙ 🌟🌟 ⌝ ֩ᰰ⃨ 🤩🤩 ׅ ɑ⃨͜ძძ ° 𝐏𝐀゙⃝𝐂K ✿ᩧ 🌟🌟 ◌

custom 538415002564536639692custom 538436047904287119379custom 538212424419066662078

14 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 7 August 2026

пишем точку ( . ) кто увидел это сооб , проверка на актив

29 Jun 2026, 13:48 UTC≈3,270 views411 reactions30 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌❌‌ུ🗝𝖾w #emo𝐣i 𝐟‌፝֟o𝚛 𝚢𝚘‌፝֟𝚞 #джейндоу #ззз 𝃣𝓠 ゙⃝🌟 ꒰⃪ۣ𓈒.᳕. ‌‌ࣰ፝֟‌꒱ۣᰰ⃪⃨‌‌ 🌟🌟🌟 ⋅ֻ֘ 𓈒𑪔 ࣪ ִ 🌟 𝆬ׄ ᭡ ꒰⃪ۣ𓈒۪‌⵿𑪍᳟ۙ 🌟🌟 ⌝ ֩ᰰ⃨ 🤩🤩 ׅ ɑ⃨͜ძძ ° 𝐏𝐀゙⃝𝐂K ✿ᩧ 🌟🌟 ◌

custom 5303169306337517814157custom 5305794471953212440129custom 5305652235521270546125

18 Jun 2026, 06:41 UTC≈4,460 views361 reactions21 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🤎🤎 🗝 𝙱𝙸𝙽𝙶𝙾 🗝🗝 🌟тметь то , что к тебе отнꭷсится 😀𓈒 ‌ ݁ ♡ и 𓈒 ‌ ݁ꭷтправь результат 😀🥹в🥹ᴋꭷмментарии 🤎🤎 #бсд #дазай

custom 5158935070358111940140custom 5161599775442732601112custom 5159021059898345005109

16 Jun 2026, 11:13 UTC≈3,890 views0 reactions13 Starsread 7 August 2026
Poll

𓈒 ‌ ♡ ꭷпрꭷ𝚌 н֜𝚊ꨲ᮫ 𝅾удׅɑчу

  1. 𓈒 ‌ ♡ 🤩🤩🤩🎀35%
  2. 𓈒 🎀🤩🤩🤩🥹39%
  3. 𓈒 ‌ ♡ 💌💌💌🎀🥹26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Jun 2026, 13:36 UTC≈4,360 views413 reactions44 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌❌‌ུ🗝𝖾w #emo𝐣i 𝐟‌፝֟o𝚛 𝚢𝚘‌፝֟𝚞 #эна #секай 𝃣𝓠 ゙⃝🌟 ꒰⃪ۣ𓈒.᳕. ‌‌ࣰ፝֟‌꒱ۣᰰ⃪⃨‌‌ 🌟🌟🌟 ⋅ֻ֘ 𓈒𑪔 ࣪ ִ 🌟 𝆬ׄ ᭡ ꒰⃪ۣ𓈒۪‌⵿𑪍᳟ۙ 🌟🌟 ⌝ ֩ᰰ⃨ 🤩🤩 ׅ ɑ⃨͜ძძ ° 𝐏𝐀゙⃝𝐂K ✿ᩧ🌟🌟 ◌

custom 5283088264054481895151custom 5282947346177498312131custom 5285480311730252762131

11 Jun 2026, 11:45 UTC≈4,100 views298 reactions34 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

◽👾𝚛 𝚒𝚌𝚎 @evanakim 🗝🗝 🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝🗝 🌸🌸 🌟moji ۪ࣶ۫۫ࣻ𖡻🥹 ࣲ 🗝🗝 🌟🌟🌟🌟🗝🗝 🥹32 - 3О зв / 65₽ 🥹5О - 65 зв / 9O₽ 🌟🌟 🥹1ОО - 125 зв / 150₽ 🥹 или указывайте свое количество , делаю от 32 1 эмодзи - 1,5 зв 🥹1,5₽ 🌟 🤩👾 нкета ◟ ✿ᩧִ ೕ ֺ 1. имя перса / фд ( фоткой ) 2. колор , палитра 3. количество эмодзи 4. ваш юз 5. оплата рублями / звёздами заказы кидать в бота @requestast_bot прочитать перед покупкой . .🌟

custom 5283235701691816392120custom 528078305632246986390custom 528073896848317508688

10 Jun 2026, 16:53 UTC≈3,560 views372 reactions32 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌֮֫ᢉֳֶ֟ 𝄄 ܾ፝֟͝ 🗝𝙰𝚅𝙸𝙶𝙰𝚃𝙸𝙾𝙽 🌟 𔓐ֲ֜ 𝓒ꭉ ིི۪۪۫۫. ‌ⱺ𝓦ȵ. ֭ ֮𑇓 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚘 ꒰͡ . թꭉꪱᜒ𝓒𝖾 ֳ֭֕₍ ‌ ݆ 🌟🌟 ♡ᖯⱺⱺʂȶ ིྀ 🌟🗝 𝐭ɑ͜𝗀͟͟ऽ : #emo𝐣i #фк #пнг 🥹🗝᥋ꫀ ຕ𑜅ꭑꫀթυ᜔ׂ𑜅ꪒы δթ𑜅ꭑꪉ ᥋ 𑄈ִꭑຕꫀꭑ𝕜𑄈ִບ݂‌ั υ᜔ׂ ꪦ𑄈ִꬶꪦυ᜔ׂ᥋к𑄈ִບ݂‌ั🌸🌸🌸

custom 5283235701691816392135custom 5280783056322469863119custom 5280738968483175086118

8 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC≈4,030 views344 reactions41 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

᜔ ֻ ⃓ַֿࣰ ᮫ ׅ ̣̣ ࣪ ू🌟 ‌݄᷒᩹. ‌۫ ꜆࣪𝙻𝙾𝚅𝙴 𝚁𝙸𝚅𝙰𝙻𝚂 ㅤ۪₍ᐢִ ؔ ᩹᷒ ִ݈ᐢ₎ ㅤׄ‌ㅤ‌ㅤ

custom 5276062547961749106132custom 5276511118641110844107custom 5265200768943697431105

8 Jun 2026, 12:01 UTC≈3,510 views337 reactions40 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❌❌‌ུ🗝𝖾w #emo𝐣i 𝐟‌፝֟o𝚛 𝚢𝚘‌፝֟𝚞 #соукоку #бсд 𝃣𝓠 ゙⃝🌟 ꒰⃪ۣ𓈒.᳕. ‌‌ࣰ፝֟‌꒱ۣᰰ⃪⃨‌‌ 🌟🌟 ⋅ֻ֘ 𓈒𑪔 ࣪ ִ 🌟 𝆬ׄ ᭡ ꒰⃪ۣ𓈒۪‌⵿𑪍᳟ۙ 🌟 ⌝ ֩ᰰ⃨ 🤩🤩 ׅ ׅ ɑ⃨͜ძძ ° 𝐏𝐀゙⃝𝐂K ✿ᩧ🌟🌟 ◌

custom 5276062547961749106129custom 5276511118641110844107custom 5265200768943697431101

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @evanakim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jun 2026, 11:13 UTCAnonymous Quiz672 voters

𓈒 ‌ ♡ ꭷпрꭷ𝚌 н֜𝚊ꨲ᮫ 𝅾удׅɑчу

  1. 𓈒 ‌ ♡ 🤩🤩🤩🎀35%
  2. 𓈒 🎀🤩🤩🤩🥹39%
  3. 𓈒 ‌ ♡ 💌💌💌🎀🥹26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 412,622 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✿࣪་༘𝒜ٕ𝗌𝗍𝓻ٌ𐇽𖹭ۤ‌ ིི۪۪۫۫ 𝗄ࣰ𝗂𝗆𝑜⃪⃘ۣ๎𝗋𝗂 ‌‌᥀᥀ ‌‌ ‌” (@evanakim), 1,393 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evanakim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.