Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IN PULSE МАРКЕТИНГ

Channel

IN PULSE МАРКЕТИНГ

@in_pulse_marketing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

438subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001814457235
TypeChannel
Username@in_pulse_marketing
DescriptionВы - про бизнес. Мы - про Ваш результат. ▫️Ведение блога под ключ: стратегия, контент, заявки ▫️Превращаем ваш блог в работающий инструмент продаж Для связи @sweet_lana_blog1
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/in_pulse_marketing

Growth

4386 Aug 2026, 09:38 — 438 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:18 — 438 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:386 Aug 2026, 19:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 437–439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:18438no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:38438first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.55%
avg views ÷ 438 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.9
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total339
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
411
Videos
35
Links
195

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC20 viewsread 6 August 2026

😘😁🌟😊🌺😊😍🌟😘😍 Давайте поддержим друг друга взаимными реакциям, комментариями и подписками🔥 УСЛОВИЯ ПРОСТЫЕ: 📎 Подписаться на мой канал и на каналы коллег, чтобы получить больше активности и подписчиков. ❤️ ТОР ИНТЕРАКТИВ ❤️Эля Про Денежный Успех❤️ ❤️ Канал Наталии Уховой ❤️ Лиззи•Фриланс с характером 🌟 ДИЗАЙН: УПАКОВКА ВК, СТОРИСЫ, МАКЕТЫ, НЕЙРОФОТО 🌟 БИЗНЕС С НУЛЯ - ЭТО ПРО МЕНЯ💎 🌟IN PULSE МАРКЕТИНГ 🌟

5 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC17 viewsread 6 August 2026

Почему хорошие проекты развиваются, а другие разваливаются ещё на старте⤵️ Очень часто предприниматели говорят: «Нам попался плохой SMM-специалист». А SMM-специалист в это же время думает: «С этим клиентом невозможно работать». И знаете, что самое интересное? Часто оба правы. Но причина совсем не там, где они её ищут. Проблема начинается тогда, когда стороны перестают слышать друг друга. Предприниматель знает с

4 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC10 viewsread 6 August 2026

Почему одни эксперты и предприниматели ПРОДАЮТ В БЛОГЕ, а другие ПРОСТО ВЕДУТ БЛОГ?🤔 Вы постите регулярно, а заявок нет. Кто-то постит реже - и у него клиенты. Разница в системном маркетинге. В системном блоге должны быть: ✅ упаковка - понятно, кому помогаете ✅ стратегия - контент ведёт по воронке ✅ регулярность - выход по плану ✅ аналитика - вы знаете, что работает Без системы вы просто тратите время. - без ст

3 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC10 viewsread 6 August 2026
File

🎙️ПОЧЕМУ БИЗНЕСУ НЕ НУЖНО РАССЧИТЫВАТЬ ТОЛЬКО НА МАРКЕТПЛЕЙСЫ? И как строить систему контента в соц. сетях, чтобы использовать разные точки входа клиентов? Тайминг и тезисы: (00:00:01 - 00:00:30) - Почему нельзя рассчитывать только на один канал продаж, даже если он хорошо работает (00:00:30 - 00:01:23) - Сколько должно быть точек входа клиентов (00:01:23 - 00:02:48) - Как строить доверие с клиентами на разных п

1 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC12 viewsread 6 August 2026

Если вы думаете, что вам нужно всегда делать креативный и интересный контент, то у нас для вас плохие новости⬇️ Вы просто будете развлекать аудиторию и собирать охваты, но не деньги☝️ Стройте маркетинговую систему в блоге, делайте триггерный продающий контент, тогда будут заявки в директ и клиенты👌 Если вы хотите: ✅ увеличить количество клиентов и заявок на ваши товары и услуги ✅ выстроить систему онлайн-маркетин

31 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026

Скучный SMM-щик - горе в компании? Или наоборот? Многие предприниматели ищут SMM-специалиста суперкреативного, позитивного, яркого, динамичного. Хотят смешной контент, тренды и вирусность🤷‍♀️ И это работает... но только на охваты. Но продаёт ли это? Чаще всего - нет. Потому что SMM-специалист - это не весёлый человек с креативным видением. Это человек с инструментами маркетинга. Вы же в своём бизнесе хотите пр

30 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC21 viewsread 6 August 2026

Сейчас практически в любой нише огромная конкуренция. Куда бы вы ни пришли - вы почти никогда не будете первыми и даже не десятыми. Поэтому предпринимателям и экспертам так важно уметь правильно доносить ценность своего продукта. Потому что вопрос клиента чаще всего не в том, почему у вас цена выше. Вопрос в другом: понял ли человек, за что он платит? Когда вы умеете объяснить ценность своего продукта, показать е

28 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC27 viewsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

🎙️КАК СОВМЕЩАТЬ ЛИЧНОЕ И ЭКСПЕРТНОЕ В БЛОГЕ, ЧТОБЫ ПРОДАВАТЬ? (Рекомендация: можно поставить скорость прослушивания на х2) Тайминг и тезисы⬇️ (00:00:26 - 00:00:55) - Почему не нужно становиться блогером, чтобы к вас покупали ваш товар, или услугу? (00:00:55 - 00:01:21) - Почему 20% личного в экспертном блоге и блоге предпринимателя это - достаточно? (00:01:48 - 00:05:53) - Как связать личное с экспертизой: 3 про

27 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026

SMM-специалист - не отдел продаж Мы часто слышим от предпринимателей: «Заявки есть, а продаж нет. Значит, виноват SMM-специалист» Но проблема обычно не в SMM. Давайте разберемся, за что вообще отвечает SMM⤵️ Его задача - привести человека в блог, сформировать доверие, показать ценность продукта и довести до заявки. То есть SMM отвечает за путь до заявки, а не за саму продажу☝️ Что происходит после заявки? Дальш

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @in_pulse_marketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 313,981 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AI и точка.
@ai4telegram · 866,603
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IN PULSE МАРКЕТИНГ” (@in_pulse_marketing), 438 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/in_pulse_marketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.