Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

import __hello__

@import_hello

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

273subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001630313407
TypeChannel
Username@import_hello
DescriptionКанал про IT, здебільшого WEB та Python, але буває й у інші теми заносить
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/import_hello

Growth

2737 Aug 2026, 14:22 — 273 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:47 — 273 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:228 Aug 2026, 08:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:47273no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22273first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Links
55

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

278 reactions across 20 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7527.0%
😁7025.2%
🔥3914.0%
269.35%
😢155.40%
👏93.24%
🤯62.16%
🗿51.80%
🤡51.80%
🎄41.44%
🎉41.44%
💊31.08%
💯31.08%
20.719%
👀20.719%
🤔20.719%
🤪20.719%
🌚10.36%
👎10.36%
🙈10.36%
3 further kinds31.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2025 to 13 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jan 2026, 16:58 UTC496 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

СЮЮДИИ https://pyfound.blogspot.com/2025/12/anthropic-invests-in-python.html

👏9👍1👎1🔥1

9 Dec 2025, 20:14 UTC881 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ось вам і до сьогоднішнього дня підказка, не дякуйте

1🙈1

2 Dec 2025, 17:07 UTC898 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хто застряг на 2 дні - ось підказка

😁6🤯21🤓1

1 Dec 2025, 10:43 UTC755 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну шо, поїхали https://adventofcode.com/2025/day/1

🔥92

23 Nov 2025, 20:55 UTC797 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вийшла 9 версія pytest, і тепер у ньому з’явилась повноцінна підтримка subtests. Цю фічу вони підрізали у стдлібного unittest. Але навіщо, якщо у pytest є такий зручний маркер parametrize? Бо parametrize корисний лише коли дані для теста відомі ще до того як тест почався, якщо ж щоб отримати ці дані треба спочатку зробити виклик у апі, чи у БД, то зробити це через paramtrize не вийде. Я часто на ці обмеження натикавс

👍82🥱1

18 Nov 2025, 12:18 UTC≈2,190 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁16💯2🤪2

22 Oct 2025, 19:00 UTC680 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Цього року (і кожного наступного) AOC буде тривати 12 днів замість 25 (прям як пивні адвент календарі) і більше не буде глобального лідерборда. Зникнення лідерборда мене не хвилює, бо я у ньому не приймав участі, бо люблю поспати 😁 А 12 днів мабуть буде навіть краще, менше стресу що не встигнеш закінчити івент до кінця року. Взагалі не розумію як автор АОС протримався так довго і скільки взагалі сил і вільного часу

👍14🤯4🤔1

20 Oct 2025, 11:33 UTC724 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вже давно хочеться щось по вечорам попілити, але придумувати новий пет проєкт щоб потім його не дороблювати не хочеться, а до Advent of Code ще цілий місяць. Добре що я згадав що є така штука як codecrafters.io Це не просто якісь абстрактні завдання типу літкода чи туду листів, це платформа яка пропонує робити завдання "а давай відтворимо redis|kafka|git|etc. на мові яка тобі подобається". Наприклад відтворюємо Redis

🔥161👀1😁1

4 Sept 2025, 23:06 UTC826 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfH4QL4VqJ0 Нарешті подивився. Навряд хтось, хто цікавився історією мови, знайде щось нове, але може бути приємно просто подивитись під чайок - непогана документалка вийшла.

👍11

28 Jun 2025, 08:35 UTC744 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @itextrapolation

​​Обожнюю таке. Нещодавно вийшла стаття, яка розглядає вплив ChatGPT на змогу людського мозоку розвиватися. Стаття, безумовно, цікава, повна пояснень та висновків, та досить велика. А ще доволі клікбейтна, бо там може бути написано, що люди тупішають, а може навпаки, що використання ChatGPT може допомогти розвивати мозок. Короче, ніпанятна, треба читати. І тут стає найцікавіше. Багато журналістів, блогерів та усіх т

😁18🤡3

30 May 2025, 20:56 UTC723 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁9🗿52💯1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @import_hello. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“import __hello__” (@import_hello), 273 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/import_hello.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.