Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pascal Najadi

Channel

Pascal Najadi

@imPascalNajadi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,149subscribers

-733 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003952789258
TypeChannel
Username@imPascalNajadi
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/imPascalNajadi

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,7487,8826,81514 September 2026 — 7,882 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,882 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,711 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,748 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,149 subscribers7,14914 September 20266 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -733. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,428–8,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 04:427,149+1,401
29 Sept 2026, 07:195,748-1,963
16 Sept 2026, 05:397,711-171
14 Sept 2026, 20:227,882no change
14 Sept 2026, 19:477,882first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.069%
avg views ÷ 7,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.9
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held19 (14 September 2026 – 14 September 2026)
Views total94
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC3 viewsread 14 September 2026

I’ve said many times that the CLARITY Act is essential to ensuring America wins the global race for new technology. That’s the reason Congress passed the GENIUS Act: to ensure that stablecoin infrastructure, a revolutionary financial technology, will be built in America. Ensuring that America’s community bank sector continues to thrive has been a constant focus of mine since day one. And the administration’s dual fo…

14 Sept 2026, 12:41 UTC5 viewsread 14 September 2026

🔻A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: IF MEDBEDS WERE ACTIVATED TONIGHT... You would not wake up to a press conference. There would be no countdown. No television announcement. No official standing beside a machine. The first evidence would appear somewhere else. SPECIALIST APPOINTMENTS SUDDENLY CANCELLED. RESTRICTED MEDICAL FACILITIES REOPENED. UNUSUAL NIGHT FLIGHTS BETWEEN MILITARY BASES. PATIENT RECORDS TRANSFERRED WIT…

14 Sept 2026, 12:41 UTC5 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🚨 NEW: The leaders of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland say the future of their nations "belongs in the European Union" as they call for independence from the UK Subscribe @imPascalNajadi

14 Sept 2026, 12:32 UTC5 viewsread 14 September 2026

HOW ON EARTH IS TRUMP GOING AROUND THE WORLD AND GETTING TREATED LIKE THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF of EVERY COUNTRY’S MILITARY??? 🫡 It’s because….. they “made the deal”! “Make the deal MOTHER F’KER or YOU WILL DIE!” as Robert David Steele said. 🧨The worldwide MILITARY INTELLIGENCE UNITS have been COLLECTING ‘the goods’ on every single criminal politician, bureaucrat, financier, banker, etc. etc. in every country of the w…

14 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC6 viewsread 14 September 2026

🔻BORAX REMOVES FLUORIDE “Borax was quickly banned in 32 countries after it was found to remove fluoride from the body. Funny how that works….” Borax = kills fleas & ticks in your pet areas outside. 🐚BORAX THE SUPER CURE 👉🏻Arthritis 👉🏻Osteoporosis 👉🏻Osteoarthritis 👉🏻Spurs 👉🏻Calcium Deposits 👉🏻Lupus 👉🏻Autoimmune 👉🏻Hormones 👉🏻Fungus/Fluoride 👉🏻Candida 👉🏻Ringworm 👉🏻Tinea Versicolor 👉🏻Insomnia 👉🏻Skin 👉🏻Impotence 👉🏻Morg…

14 Sept 2026, 09:22 UTC6 viewsread 14 September 2026

GET YOURSELF REGISTERED TO THE QUANTUM FINANCIAL SYSTEM (QFS) NOW‼️ BE A HOLDER NOW SEND A DM : https://t.me/imPascalNajadiAdmin 1. HOW DO I PURCHASE THE RECOMMENDED ISO TOKENS 2. HOW DO I GET REGISTERED TO THE QFS SYSTEM 3. HOW DO I DOWNLOAD MY DECENTRALIZED WALLET 4. HOW DO I SECURE MY ASSETS INTO QFS SEND A PRIVATE MESSAGE NOW FOR YOUR PERSONAL QUESTION 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/imPascalNajadiAdmin

14 Sept 2026, 09:19 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 14 September 2026

September 13 Space Weather Update After several quiet days, space weather is beginning to rise again. Two coronal holes—one in the Sun’s northern region and one in its southern region—are turning toward Earth and sending dual streams of solar wind in our direction. Their arrival is expected from September 14–16. The incoming activity is being produced by coronal-hole high-speed solar wind. The second stream shou…

👍1

14 Sept 2026, 09:16 UTC5 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

The leaders of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland will sign an agreement tomorrow to collaborate on leaving the United Kingdom. Subscribe @imPascalNajadi

14 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC5 viewsread 14 September 2026

Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement. I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased…

14 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTC4 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

🚨 TRUMP JUST DROPPED THIS BANGER I VOTED FOR THIS 🔥 Subscribe @imPascalNajadi

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @imPascalNajadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pascal Najadi” (@imPascalNajadi), 7,149 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imPascalNajadi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.