Channel
@WHPressPool
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
636subscribers
-1,071 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003904446270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WHPressPool |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WHPressPool |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 636 | -394 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 1,030 | -629 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 1,659 | -48 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 1,707 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (10 September 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead. You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement. I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased…
Full Disclosure Nothing Hidden
End of an era… 💔 The visionary who helped bring Cartoon Network to life, giving generations a home for unforgettable cartoons and childhood memories, has sadly passed away. Ted Turner transformed television and entertainment through his groundbreaking media empire, leaving an incredible legacy that continues to live on through the worlds he helped create. 🕊️ #TedTurner #CartoonNetwork #CNN #TurnerBroadcasting #Chil…
If you’re active and not a bot following me, when you see this post on your feed, say hi 👋🏻 or give thumbs up❤️ FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
1,000 XLM at $1 is just $1,000.🛑 That won't change your life. That’s a rent payment, not financial freedom. If you want real, generational wealth, you need to think bigger and accumulate more.Stop settling for pocket change. Play the long game. 🚀 #XLM #Stellar@WHPressPool
🚨$346+ BILLION IS ALREADY TOKENISED ACROSS 47 ASSET CLASSES! And this is still the beginning... As tokenisation grows into the trillions and eventually tens of trillions, protocols like $HBAR, $LINK, $XLM, $ONDO and $XRP are sitting directly in the path of that transformation. The thesis we’ve been talking about for years is starting to play out as traditional finance is moving onchain, asset class by asset class.…
$XRP $1.37 - $5 is the start of the price movement $XRP $5-$8 is where $XRP could be directly after September 15th $XRP $8-10 is where $XRP could be by the end of September $XRP $10 - $100 is conservatively where $XRP could be by end of November
⭐️FOCUS ON CONGRESS ⭐️THEY THINK YOU ARE STUPID ⭐️FEAR NOT Q ⭐️SECRET WILL BE OUT SOON WE GOT THEM ALL! Q STORM 1776
🏦 A 163-year-old U.S. bank just moved its own stablecoin across Europe. And it didn’t use a private blockchain. It used Stellar $XLM 🌐 U.S. Bank - the 5th-largest commercial bank in America - completed a live USBDC transfer between North America and Europe on the public Stellar $XLM network. That matters. Because the bank kept all the controls regulators care about: Minting 🔁 Redemption 🛡 Freezing ↩️ Clawbacks 🧩 …
🔥 RIPPLE JUST GOT SEATED AT THE SAME TABLE AS BLACKROCK AND J.P. MORGAN — AND THE CITY OF LONDON IS BACKING IT 🇬🇧 The City of London officially listed Ripple among firms working with the UK’s Wholesale Digital Markets Champion to scale tokenisation of wholesale financial markets. Same list as: BlackRock. J.P. Morgan. Goldman Sachs. HSBC. Citi. Morgan Stanley. UBS. DTCC.
🇺🇸 CLARITY ACT - WHAT IF CONGRESS DOESN’T PASS IT? 🇺🇸America Deserves to Continue leading the Financial Capital of the World 🇺🇸 and the #Crypto Capital of the world. This is my Stance and i will explain Why in different post. 📌We need the CLARITY Act , but if Congress fails to pass it, there may still be another route forward. ⚠️If Congress does not pass the CLARITY Act, the President cannot simply sign it into…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @WHPressPool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“White House Press Pool Reports” (@WHPressPool), 636 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WHPressPool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.