Channel

..

@ilturmoil

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

47subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001360099361
Type	Channel
Username	@ilturmoil
Created	Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	10 August 2026
Last confirmed live	4 November 2026
Measurements held	6
Confirmed unchanged	7 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegram	t.me/ilturmoil

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted first	Then	Overlap	Gap
@asmjbtjb/691326 Aug 2023, 19:34 UTC	@ilturmoil/16984 · this entry26 Aug 2023, 19:34 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@asmjbtjb/691426 Aug 2023, 19:39 UTC	@ilturmoil/16985 · this entry26 Aug 2023, 19:39 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@ilturmoil/16986 · this entry5 Sept 2023, 11:36 UTC	@asmjbtjb/69155 Sept 2023, 11:36 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@ilturmoil/16992 · this entry14 Sept 2023, 09:08 UTC	@asmjbtjb/691914 Sept 2023, 09:08 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@ilturmoil/16994 · this entry25 Sept 2023, 19:27 UTC	@asmjbtjb/692125 Sept 2023, 19:27 UTC	1.00	under a minute
@asmjbtjb/69244 Oct 2023, 09:04 UTC	@ilturmoil/16997 · this entry4 Oct 2023, 09:04 UTC	1.00	under a minute

Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Channel	Matching posts	Text overlap	Typical gap	Published first
@asmjbtjb	6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)	1.00	under a minute	this entry (6–0)
@edit_kpop1	6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)	1.00	under a minute	@edit_kpop1 (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 16 August 2023 to 4 October 2023. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ilturmoil — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

مـلگتهہ 👑❤️
@asmjbtjb · Channel30 subscribers ..
@edit_kpop1 · Channel7 subscribers

Growth

6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–52 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Sept 2026, 17:39	47	-1
7 Sept 2026, 08:40	48	-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:06	49	-1
22 Aug 2026, 10:58	50	-1
10 Aug 2026, 10:46	51	no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:28	51	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 August 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

💫 Phrases 💫
@Anime_Phrases · 531 post 夢.
@anime_v · 3771 post 𓆩ᴀʀᴛʏ𓆪
@aya_20212 · 311 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

لِـنَثمِل بِالـدِمآءャ.
@blood690 · 1,2839 posts ريِف إسڪُتلَندا،
@bnbn_ki · 4949 posts إِنْجّلتَࢪَاّ.
@England975 · 1189 posts 𝐁𝐓𝐒 𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐂
@fan_bts123 · 469 posts 𝐿𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑎 .
@for_lalisa · 939 posts 𝙜𝙞𝙛 𝙅𝙆
@gifjk1 · 589 posts - 𝐈𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐒 َ♡.
@iconsrx · 279 posts unsubs.
@idcfuckk · 89 posts –『 𝒎𝒃𝒕𝒊 』.
@IIMBTI · 3,2809 posts وهــــم♪.
@ivx_o8 · 5459 posts ⋆ 𝖩ꫀꪀ𝖽ꫀ𝗋ꫀ𝗅𝗅𝖺 .
@jennie_kim_R1 · 1599 posts الِقِهُوائِي.‏
@jhjjhghgd · 3239 posts مَلاذ سبتَمبِر
@JKQQC · 5639 posts ɢαℓαxy ĸαi𐤀
@kaiunevirse · 549 posts توت
@kpopsasnag · 569 posts ╰╮𝐓𝐡𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖽 𝐒𝗈𝗎𝗇𝐡𝐢 💘 ָ࣪ 𓄹˖
@kpopstaaann · 449 posts أجر🕊.
@KZZGG · 1779 posts فترة و تعدي ✨
@like_thestars · 2689 posts - مُهيب.
@lltkt · 2599 posts إيـَروَس
@love7xr · 2139 posts مهَوَوس .
@lwzaj · 549 posts 𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒚𝒐𝒖.
@mixjim · 709 posts 𝗖𝖺𝗻𝖽𝘆
@mixrro · 239 posts hamd
@muhemd · 19 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“..” (@ilturmoil), 47 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilturmoil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.

..