Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ilm4all

@ilm4all

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,293subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009516740
TypeChannel
Username@ilm4all
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilm4all

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ilm4all/4943 · this entry13 Jul 2026, 02:09 UTC@ilm4all_books/129513 Jul 2026, 02:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@ilm4all/4944 · this entry14 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC@ilm4all_books/129614 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@ilm4all/4945 · this entry15 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC@ilm4all_books/129715 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@ilm4all_books/130828 Jul 2026, 02:26 UTC@ilm4all/4956 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 02:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@ilm4all/4957 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC@ilm4all_books/130928 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@ilm4all/4958 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC@ilm4all_books/131029 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ilm4all_books17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (134)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ilm4all — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,2923,2933,292.55 August 2026 — 3,293 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,293 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,292 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,293 subscribers5 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,292–3,293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:183,293+1
8 Aug 2026, 21:573,292-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:473,293no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:273,293first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 3,293 subscribers
Avg views / post
336
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.997%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (11 July 202631 July 2026)
Views total5,720
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5185.0%
💯813.3%
👍11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Love Of Dunya: The Mother Of All Sufferings Part #7 7️⃣ The Real Cure For Depression, Anxiety Is In Following Islaam: Despite their remarkable advances in medicine and technology, these countries and nations cannot offer the true and complete relief that a heart burdened with sorrow, anxiety, depression, and trauma seeks. By Allaah! No religion offers a comprehensive cure for al-Hazn (regret about the past), al-

1

Signed Fahad Barmem

29 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC199 viewsread 7 August 2026

(there is) a severe torment (for the disbelievers, evil-doers), and (there is) Forgiveness from Allaah and (His) Good Pleasure (for the Believers). The life of this world is nothing but enjoyment of delusion.} 📚 [Surah al-Hadeed (57): 20] End Of Part 6 To Be Continued…

Signed Fahad Barmem

29 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC209 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Love Of Dunya: The Mother Of All Sufferings Part #6 6️⃣ The Worldly Life: A Deception of Enjoyment: Many of those who publicly speak about joy and happiness in their lives - such as social media influencers, bloggers, and vloggers - present an image that is exaggerated and often far removed from reality. They carefully display moments of laughter and success while concealing their pain, anxiety, and sorrow behind

Signed Fahad Barmem

28 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC213 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Love Of Dunya: The Mother Of All Sufferings Part #5 5️⃣ Even Children Are Suffering From PTSD: A growing number of people are experiencing depression, anxiety, and chronic stress. Alarmingly, children are also developing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after experiencing or witnessing deeply frightening, distressing, or prolonged traumatic events. PTSD can result from experiences such as serious accidents,

1

Signed Foodie Fahoodie

28 Jul 2026, 02:27 UTC213 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Love Of Dunya: The Mother Of All Sufferings Part #4 4. The World Is A House Of Sorrow: “All praise and thanks belong to Allaah, Who has removed from us all grief.” This is the statement that the people of Paradise will make after they enter Jannah. As for this worldly life, it is, in reality, an abode of sorrow and hardship. We often forget that after Aadam عليه السلام was sent out of Jannah because of his disobed

2

Signed Foodie Fahoodie

27 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC248 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Allaah does not delay a matter except for (a greater) good. And He does not deprive you of something except for (a greater) good. And no calamity befalls you except for (a greater) good. So, do not be disheartened... For the Lord of (all) goodness, nothing comes (from Him) except good!

5💯4

Signed Foodie Fahoodie

26 Jul 2026, 22:36 UTC251 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Love Of Dunya: The Mother Of All Sufferings Part #3 3️⃣ The Real Deception: Do you know what the people of Jannah (Paradise) will say after they have entered it—after they have been adorned with gold and pearls, clothed in garments of silk, resting in cool shade, reclining on luxurious couches, surrounded by gardens beneath which rivers flow, with fruits hanging low and within easy reach? After receiving all of t

1

Signed Fahad Barmem

25 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC259 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Love Of Dunya: The Mother Of All Sufferings Part #2 2️⃣ Luxuries And The Earlier Generations: Compared to previous generations, the present generation enjoys a far more comfortable life. Many things that were once considered luxuries have now become ordinary necessities. In the past, only a few could afford cars and other vehicles, whereas today almost every household has some form of modern transportation, wheth

2👍1💯1

Signed Fahad Barmem

24 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC246 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Love Of Dunya: The Mother Of All Sufferings Part #1 1️⃣ The Past, The Present, And The Future: Depression, tightness of the chest, restlessness, stress, anxiety, sorrow, distress, agitation, discomfort, fear, and similar psychological disturbances are all unpleasant visitors. These are not guests one can see; these are not guests that physically occupy space in the home. The problem with these guests is that the

5💯3

Signed Foodie Fahoodie

23 Jul 2026, 17:49 UTC689 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Praising Allaah after having food: The Messenger of Allaah ﷺ said: ❝Whoever eats food and then says: الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الَّذِي أَطْعَمَنِي هَذَا وَرَزَقَنِيهِ مِنْ غَيْرِ حَوْلٍ مِنِّي وَلاَ قُوَّةٍ (Al-ḥamdulillaah, alladhee aṭ`amanee haadha wa razaqaneehi min ghairi ḥawlin minnee, wa laa quwwah) “All praise is to Allaah who has fed me this and granted it as provision to me, without any effort from me nor power (on

5

Signed Foodie Fahoodie

23 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC310 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Day Of Judgment Will Be A Cause Of Grief For Those Who Wasted Their Time: Abu Hurairah رضي الله عنه narrated that the Prophet ﷺ said: ❝Those people who get up from a gathering in which they did not remember Allaah will be just as if they had got up from (a gathering) similar to that of the carcass of a donkey, and it will be a cause of grief to them.❞ 1️⃣ Abu Hurairah رضي الله عنه narrated that the Prophet ﷺ sa

1

Signed Foodie Fahoodie

22 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC294 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Narrated Ibn Abbas رضي الله عنهما: The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said: "There are two blessings which many people lose: (they are good) Health and Free Time (for doing good)." 📚 [Saheeh al-Bukhaaree]

5

Signed Foodie Fahoodie

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ilm4all. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 793,946 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ilm4all” (@ilm4all), 3,293 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilm4all.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.