Channel
@igumenceva_pro_face31
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
168subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003470455985 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @igumenceva_pro_face31 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/igumenceva_pro_face31 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 168 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 170 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 170 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 48.4% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 14.5% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 8.06% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 8.06% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Если раньше первые проявления акне чаще появлялись в 13-14 лет, то сегодня все больше детей сталкиваются с этой проблемой уже в 9-10 лет. И это действительно тревожная тенденция… Но важно понимать: далеко не каждое высыпание - это гормональное акне. На самом деле примерно в половине случаев причина совсем другая - неправильно подобранный уход, его отсутствие или слишком раннее использование декоративной косметики.…
❤4
Лето, пляж, море… Казалось бы, что может быть приятнее, чем ароматные духи, любимое масло для загара и свежий дезодорант? Однако, даже самые привычные косметические средства могут сыграть с вами злую шутку под солнцем. Давайте разберёмся, почему их стоит заменить на более подходящие альтернативы во время отдыха у воды. 1️⃣ Масло для загара и солнце - опасная пара Масло, особенно если оно без SPF-защиты, может усил…
🔥4
Когда похудела, и постарела одновременно! Огромная проблема наших дней. Я не перестану повторять, что уколы для похудения имеют огромное количество побочных явлений, и многие из них — необратимы! Сейчас по факту: каждая четвёртая моя пациентка колет себе "волшебные уколы", а каждая третья колет их себе без назначения врача...
🤯5❤1🔥1
Лучшая визитная карточка косметолога - это результаты его пациентов. Изменения кожи, уменьшение воспалений, ровный тон лица и уверенность в своём отражении говорят о работе специалиста лучше любых слов 🔥 Именно поэтому в своей работе я прежде всего ориентируюсь на результат и здоровье кожи моих пациентов 💖 ЗАПИСЬ НА ИЮЛЬ ОТКРЫТА ✅ Для записи напишите мне в сообщения @igumenceva_pro_face
❤8🔥3🥰2
Мои дорогие красивые пациенты! 💖 Хочу заранее предупредить о важных изменениях ⬇️ ❗️С 1 июля будет небольшое повышение стоимости процедур. Также обращаю внимание, что при оплате по безналичному расчёту к стоимости услуг будет добавляться 10% - это комиссия банка, которую я, к сожалению, больше не могу компенсировать самостоятельно. Спасибо за ваше доверие и понимание. Буду рада видеть вас на процедурах 🫶🏻
❤5🥰2🤩1
Иногда, чтобы прийти к желаемому результату - достаточно понять до банального простые вещи 😄
❤6👏1
Девушка пришла ко мне после неудачного опыта лечения акне с другим специалистом. Расстроенная, уставшая, и практически потерявшая всякую надежду... С прошлым специалистом они делали только процедуры в кабинете 🫠 В домашний уход ничего назначено не было - никаких рекомендаций, а тем более схем и конкретных средств с нужными активами пациентке не рекомендовали. Как итог - никакой положительной динамики ❌ На фото р…
👍9❤2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4🔥1🥰1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @igumenceva_pro_face31. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,067,818 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Косметолог Елена Игуменцева” (@igumenceva_pro_face31), 168 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igumenceva_pro_face31.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.