Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for چنین گفت ابن‌تیمیه

Channel

چنین گفت ابن‌تیمیه

@ibnTaymiyyahFa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

405subscribers

+222 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004458411582
TypeChannel
Username@ibnTaymiyyahFa
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 10 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ibnTaymiyyahFa

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

182405293.56 August 2026 — 183 subscribers6 August 2026 — 182 subscribers14 August 2026 — 204 subscribers21 August 2026 — 270 subscribers27 August 2026 — 274 subscribers3 September 2026 — 285 subscribers8 September 2026 — 285 subscribers11 September 2026 — 319 subscribers19 September 2026 — 405 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 44 days, net +222. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 149–438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:39405+86
11 Sept 2026, 13:20319+34
8 Sept 2026, 07:22285no change
3 Sept 2026, 10:23285+11
27 Aug 2026, 22:33274+4
21 Aug 2026, 05:13270+66
14 Aug 2026, 13:58204+22
6 Aug 2026, 12:20182-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:38183first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
134.4%
avg views ÷ 405 subscribers
Avg views / post
544
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held20 (10 August 20264 September 2026)
Views total3,809
Reactions total100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 19s
Average length
1m 46s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

259 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23590.7%
👍176.56%
👏31.16%
🤝31.16%
10.386%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 259 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC125 views11 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «هر کس ابو حنیفه و دیگر پیشوایان اسلام را که بر این باور بودند الله بر فراز عرش است، کافر بداند، خود او سزاوارتر به تکفیر است.» (جامع المسائل: ۳۳۷/۷) https://t.me/ibnTaymiyyahFa

11

4 Sept 2026, 03:51 UTC≈1,570 views14 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «اگر انسان به جای دعا کردن، بر پیامبر ﷺ درود بفرستد، الله او را در امور دنیا و آخرتش از آنچه برایش اهمیت دارد، کفایت خواهد کرد زیرا هر بار که یک مرتبه بر پیامبر ﷺ درود می‌فرستد، الله ده بار بر او درود می‌فرستد. و اگر انسان برای هر یک از مومنان دعا کند، فرشتگان می‌گویند: «آمین و برای تو نیز همانند آن باشد.» پس درود فرستادن او بر پیامبر ﷺ سزاوارتر به این است که چنین دعایی در حق او پذی

14

3 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC184 views15 reactionsread 8 September 2026

بزّار از شیخ خود یعنی ابن‌ تیمیه، دربارهٔ علت اهتمام بیشتر او به عقاید در مقایسه با فقه، چنین نقل می‌کند: «ابن‌ تیمیه رضي الله عنه در علم اصول، بیش از سایر علوم به تألیف و تصنیف پرداخت. از این‌ رو از او دربارهٔ علت این امر پرسیدم و از وی خواستم رساله‌ای فقهی تألیف کند که دیدگاه‌ها و ترجیحات فقهی او را یکجا گرد آورد تا مرجعی برای فتوا باشد. او در پاسخ، به این مضمون گفت: «مسائل فقهی در مقایسه با مسائل اصولی، اهمیت و

15

3 Sept 2026, 05:32 UTC972 views10 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «برترین کلامی که انسان می‌تواند بر زبان آورد، کلمهٔ توحید است. چنان‌که پیامبر ﷺ فرمود: «برترین ذکر «لا إله إلا الله» و برترین دعا «الحمد لله» است.» و نیز فرمود: «هر کس آخرین سخنش «لا إله إلا الله» باشد، وارد بهشت می‌شود.» (مجموع الفتاوی: ۳۵۱/۲) https://t.me/ibnTaymiyyahFa

10

28 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC364 views16 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

اگر حق بر تو مشتبه شد، از الله هدایت بخواه سفارش ابن تیمیه رحمه الله به طالب علم و هر جویندهٔ حق و هدایت: اگر در مسأله‌ای که درباره‌اش اختلاف شده دچار تردید شد، دعایی را بخواند که مسلم در صحیح خود از عایشه رضي الله‌ عنها روایت کرده است؛ پیامبر ﷺ هنگامی که شب برای نماز برمی‌خاست، می‌فرمود: «اللهم رب جبریل وميكائيل وإسرافيل، فاطر السموات والأرض عالم الغيب والشهادة أنت تحكم بين عبادك فيما كانوا فيه يختلفون، اهدني لما

11👍5

25 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC324 views12 reactionsread 8 September 2026

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «مقصود این است که قرار دادن این روز به‌ عنوان عید، امری نوپدید و بی‌اساس است. در میان سلف، چه از اهل‌ بیت و چه دیگران، کسی نبود که این روز را عید قرار دهد و برای آن اعمال خاصی انجام دهد زیرا عید، یکی از احکام و شعائر شرعی است و در آن باید از شریعت پیروی کرد، نه اینکه بدعت ایجاد کرد. پیامبر ﷺ در روزهای گوناگونی مانند بدر، حنین، خندق، فتح مکه، زمان هجرت و ورود به مدینه، خطبه‌ها، پیمان

9👏3

25 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC270 views22 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «اما برگزاری مناسبت‌هایی غیر از مناسبت‌های شرعی مانند برخی شب‌های ربیع‌ الاول که گفته می‌شود شب میلاد پیامبر است یا برخی شب‌های رجب یا هجدهم ذی‌ الحجه یا نخستین جمعهٔ ماه رجب یا هشتم شوال که جاهلان آن را «عید ابرار» می‌نامند، از بدعت‌هایی است که سلف آن را مستحب ندانسته و انجام نداده‌اند.» (مجموع الفتاوى: ۲۹۸/۲۵) https://t.me/ibnTaymiyyahFa

211

19 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC751 views18 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «هیچ مبتدعی را نمی‌یابی مگر اینکه دوست دارد نصوصی را که با دیدگاه او مخالفت دارند پنهان کند و از آن‌ نصوص بیزار است و همچنین از نقل و بازگو کردن آن‌ها نفرت دارد و از کسی که چنین کاری انجام دهد نیز بیزار است. چنان‌که برخی از سلف گفته‌اند: «هیچ‌ کس بدعتی پدید نمی‌آورد مگر اینکه شیرینی حدیث از دلش گرفته می‌شود.» (مجموع الفتاوى: ۱۶۱/۲۰) https://t.me/ibnTaymiyyahFa

14👍4

18 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC324 views19 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Forwarded from @adelheidari

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «در آنان [رافضیان] تأمل کردم و دیدم هر عیبی که به صحابه نسبت می‌دهند، خودشان بیش از هر گروه دیگری بدان صفت متصف‌اند؛ در حالی که صحابه از آن عیوب بسیار دورترند. بی‌تردید، آنان دروغگوترین مردم‌اند؛ همانند مُسَیْلَمۀ کذّاب که می‌گفت: «من پیامبری راستگو هستم و محمد دروغگوست.» از همین رو، خود را اهل ایمان می‌نامند و صحابه را منافق می‌خوانند؛ در حالی که خودشان از همه طوایف، نفاق بیشتری د

19

17 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC353 views18 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «هیچ‌ کس حق ندارد مسلمانی را هر چند خطا کرده و دچار اشتباه شده باشد، تکفیر کند مگر آنکه حجت بر او اقامه شود و راه حق برایش روشن گردد. کسی که مسلمان بودنش با یقین ثابت شده است، با شک و تردید از اسلام خارج نمی‌شود بلکه این حکم تنها پس از اقامهٔ حجت و برطرف شدن شبهه از میان می‌رود.» (مجموع الفتاوى: ۴۶۶/۱۲) https://t.me/ibnTaymiyyahFa

17👍1

16 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC454 views15 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

شیخ الإسلام ابن تیمیه رحمه الله: «دفاع از علمای مسلمان در برابر تکفیر حتی اگر مرتکب خطا شده باشند، از شایسته‌ترین اهداف و مقاصد شرعی است. حتی اگر فرض کنیم فردی که در برابر تکفیر فردی می‌ایستد، بر این باور باشد که او کافر نیست و با هدف حمایت از او و یاری برادر مسلمانش از وی دفاع کند، همین کار نیز هدفی نیکو و مشروع به شمار می‌آید و اگر در این کار اجتهاد کند و به صواب برسد، دو پاداش دارد و اگر اجتهاد کند و خطا کند، یک

11👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ibnTaymiyyahFa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چنین گفت ابن‌تیمیه” (@ibnTaymiyyahFa), 405 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibnTaymiyyahFa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.