Квиддичнутые ребята тусят вместе. Исполнители ролей Пенелопы Кристалл, Оливера Вуда, Перегрина Деррика и Люциана Боула.
🔥58custom 524685738023428765415🤗6👍3custom 53865494220101718682custom 53841217905303568101

Channel
@i_am_potterhead_hp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
36,046subscribers
+366 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001430195651 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i_am_potterhead_hp |
| Description | Купить рекламу с маркировкой https://telega.in/c/i_am_potterhead_hp Для связи с админом👉 @pr_potterhead Центр притяжения русскоязычного фандома Гарри Поттер. Юмор, новости, товары. Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a014cbde97c91600d32ec0 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i_am_potterhead_hp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 36,046 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 36,071 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 36,077 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 36,088 | +109 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 35,979 | +273 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 35,706 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 35,714 | +30 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 35,684 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 35,680 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (31 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 70,600 |
| Reactions total | 4,105 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,105 reactions across 26 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 982 | 23.9% | |
| custom 5393140689276011802 | 302 | 7.36% | |
| 🔥 | 279 | 6.80% | |
| ❤🔥 | 215 | 5.24% | |
| 💯 | 182 | 4.43% | |
| custom 5339024908800245852 | 146 | 3.56% | |
| 🤗 | 144 | 3.51% | |
| custom 5366220581588987360 | 138 | 3.36% | |
| custom 5226921709709306943 | 114 | 2.78% | |
| 🥰 | 107 | 2.61% | |
| 👍 | 106 | 2.58% | |
| custom 5357407209913329884 | 101 | 2.46% | |
| custom 5233567325491306630 | 92 | 2.24% | |
| custom 5316854506661642080 | 90 | 2.19% | |
| 🌚 | 69 | 1.68% | |
| custom 5278261296339374615 | 56 | 1.36% | |
| custom 5282806162012523526 | 55 | 1.34% | |
| custom 5233658653675890160 | 53 | 1.29% | |
| custom 5411230975562646054 | 51 | 1.24% | |
| custom 5935843166136572058 | 49 | 1.19% | |
| 49 further kinds | 774 | 18.9% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFK792qX | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Квиддичнутые ребята тусят вместе. Исполнители ролей Пенелопы Кристалл, Оливера Вуда, Перегрина Деррика и Люциана Боула.
🔥58custom 524685738023428765415🤗6👍3custom 53865494220101718682custom 53841217905303568101
Поттероманские истории:
custom 523356732549130663092🤣55custom 532589016436966840619custom 52942402196529631256🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
🥰90custom 529401745687918845927custom 529418442802778799814custom 52943549854740798468👍2
По информации Variety актер Николас Холт получил роль Златопуста Локонса во втором сезоне сериала о Гарри Поттере. Пшпш🔥 Интересный факт. Николас с детства был поттероманом и перед съемками первого фильма пробовался сразу на несколько ролей, в том числе на Гарри Поттера и Драко Малфоя. Правда, ни одна из этих ролей ему тогда не досталась. Но мечты сбываются, сейчас он станет легендарным: "Позвольте представить вашег…
🔥87custom 524488348198452057930custom 522695897284558956110❤🔥4🤣3custom 52291776498714862883👍1🤩1
erid: 2W5zFK792qX ДА НУ, ПЛАНШЕТ В ПОДАРОК?? 🥰 И это ещё не всё... На годовое обучение профессии «Цифровой художник» сейчас дают скидку -40% ✨ За 13 месяцев ты: - Освоишь композицию, свет, цвет, перспективу, анатомию, стилизацию - Научишься создавать персонажей, концепты, иллюстрации - Соберёшь портфолио из 5 проектов и 11+ работ - Попробуешь оплачиваемые заказы уже во время обучения 👨🎨 Учиться можно с личным на…
👍11custom 53076316656888906245🔥2custom 54112309755626460542👏1custom 53931406892760118021
Когда перечитал и пересмотрел Гарри Поттера, прочел много допов и идешь всех рвать на квизе:
custom 539314068927601180292🤣66custom 545213665211162077824💯13custom 54112309755626460544🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣153😭25custom 524026791255975232723custom 53210251518342742304🥰3
— Поттероман? После стольких лет? (Ответ сам прозвучит в ваших головах.) Вы приглашены в один из крупнейших, атмосферных и ламповых каналов по Гарри Поттеру в телеграм. Возьмите летучий порох. 👉А вот камин для перемещения👈
custom 539314068927601180267custom 529439068953721168313custom 539541603410041343911👍3🤩2🥰2
Подсмотрено у нас в комментах.😅 Понимаю, что это скорее всего коммент ребенка, но это ведь даже не мнение, а откровенная глупость, а над глупостью смеяться можно. Причем тут Рикман вообще? Актеры это лицедеи, которые временно вживаются в определенную роль, отыгрывают ее, получают деньги и идут дальше играть новые роли. Думать, что темнокожий актер оскорбляет другого актера, играя его бывшую роль — это уже что-то из о…
custom 5357407209913329884101👍46custom 524940756001595148026💯12🤣6custom 53031937790611489355💔4🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 5226921709709306943114🤣26custom 523365865367589016024💯6custom 52267245750053848264😍3🤗2
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣108custom 530325470317224160618custom 533902490880024585212🤪5custom 53256567157172596975❤🔥2
Не знаю как кому, но мне очень приятно и комфортно от той мысли, что уже в этом месяце НВО начнут снимать второй сезон Гарри Поттера🥹
💯124custom 521087638620134039922custom 522695897284558956121🤗7custom 52311795169482588406💔5🌚3❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @i_am_potterhead_hp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@i_am_potterhead_hp edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 35,377 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гарри Поттер | я поттероман😎” (@i_am_potterhead_hp), 36,046 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i_am_potterhead_hp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.