Завтра результаты, кому-то достанется красивейший мерч по «В плену» или сертификат на книги 💜
❤🔥24custom 54137114694999509996❤3custom 53346978065589451262

Channel
@enderinart
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,080subscribers
+385 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001761381780 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enderinart |
| Description | Автор романа «Мгновения вечности» (издательство «АСТ») Живу в Германии. Пишу о любви и магии. 18+ 💬 больше драмионы: @enderin_space_bot 📚 ficbook.net/authors/5282432 🌐 https://taplink.cc/enderin ✉️ @eaveav / @EnderinTeam / [email protected] |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enderinart |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 15:58 | 7,080 | -11 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:49 | 7,091 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:06 | 7,092 | +7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:29 | 7,085 | -20 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 7,105 | -60 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:21 | 7,165 | +56 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 7,109 | +31 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 7,078 | +25 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 7,053 | +21 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 7,032 | +74 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 04:56 | 6,958 | +192 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:42 | 6,766 | +67 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 6,699 | -11 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 6,710 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 6,728 | -18 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 6,746 | -13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 6,759 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 6,774 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 6,785 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 6,803 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 31,426 |
| Reactions total | 3,330 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,745 reactions across 59 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 2,517 | 32.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1,732 | 22.4% | |
| ❤ | 1,466 | 18.9% | |
| custom 5334697806558945126 | 785 | 10.1% | |
| 💘 | 441 | 5.69% | |
| 😁 | 361 | 4.66% | |
| custom 5451782136921094201 | 184 | 2.38% | |
| custom 5334580442282616484 | 152 | 1.96% | |
| custom 5413711469499950999 | 96 | 1.24% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 0.142% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,745 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @enderinart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (26.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Завтра результаты, кому-то достанется красивейший мерч по «В плену» или сертификат на книги 💜
❤🔥24custom 54137114694999509996❤3custom 53346978065589451262
Бершка очень тонко чувствует то, что творится у меня внутри ❤️🔥
❤🔥48❤19🔥12
Ждать ли нам намеки на драмиону в новом сериале от HBO? Актеров уже активно фотографируют вместе, подогревая наше любопытство, но при этом в каноне пейрингом даже не пахнет 🪄 Вы как думаете? ✉️ Полная запись подкаста ❤️
❤🔥56❤23🔥17💯1
То есть этот гад решил самоутвердиться за ее счет и посчитал, что ему все сойдёт с рук? До этого момента Лили успешно игнорировала его выходки и подколы в ее сторону, потому что ничто не заставило бы пчелу перестать жужжать. Но раз уж он достал жало, почему бы не дать ему себя ужалить и не проявить великодушие, позволив ему умереть? — Мне не нравится этот взгляд, — произнесла Джин с опаской. — Что ты задумала? — Мн…
🔥43❤🔥10custom 533469780655894512610❤8
Как же я жду третий сезон «Макстон-Холла», люблю-обожаю первую-одержимую любовь 🤩 Ждем уже 9 декабря 🤩 Когда меня спрашивают на что похожи «Мгновения», я готова размахивать фотографиями Руби и Джеймса 😂
❤🔥79custom 533469780655894512623❤16🔥7
Первый журнал по Драмионе и я в нем 💜 Вместе с интервью внутри вас ждут красивейшие арты @frabelss из наших с ней проектов 💜 Заказать журнал можно здесь 💜 покупка поста = оформление предзаказа, количество ограничено, лучше поспешить 🤩
❤🔥60custom 533469780655894512623🔥9❤4
Найден какой-то нереальный арт по «Скованным» (или Alchemised) ❤️
❤🔥95custom 533469780655894512623🔥15❤8
Гермиона агент популярного ловца ⚽️ #enderin_переписка по мотивам фанфика «Имидж победителя» 🤩
❤131custom 533469780655894512648🔥38💘4
Мы так много потеряли. Просто представьте, что каждый популярный сериал нулевых имел полуобноженную фотоссесию из кровати (даже по моему любимому «Каслу» такая была) 👩🍳 Нуждаюсь в подобном у Эллы И Бельмонта, правда его девушка такое точно не выдержит…
❤🔥87custom 533469780655894512628🔥17❤7
Начинаем день с нишевых мемов, я надеюсь у вас всё каписько сегодня 😎
😁65❤19❤🔥11🔥3
— «Сегодня мне особенно тоскливо», — начал читать Драко, нарочно обыгрывая каждую фразу. Столь выразительно люди обычно читали стихи, а он решил приукрасить интонацией её глупые подростковые мысли. — «Малфой заболел. Я знаю, это глупо, потому что мне должно быть всё равно. Но по пятницам у нас совместные Зелья, а он так в этом хорош. И хотя Слизнорт хвалит его наравне с Гарри, все знают, что Гарри и вполовину не так …
🔥72custom 533469780655894512632❤🔥19❤4
Лукреций шагнул ближе, и Тео пожалел, что не отступил вовремя. От отца всегда пахло металлом и лекарствами; он будто тлел в собственном золоте. — Ты не передумал? — едва слышно произнес он. Сердце подпрыгнуло к горлу, и Тео рефлекторно сжал руки в кулаки. — Ты ее отпустишь. Такой был уговор. Теодор узнал, что у него есть невеста, еще до того, как решил возвращаться во дворец. У Лукреция не было привычных рычагов …
❤🔥53custom 541371146949995099914🔥11💘3
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @enderinart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@enderinart edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ева Эндерин” (@enderinart), 7,080 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enderinart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.