连续报道了两起儿童因基因实验死亡案例,这些孩子为什么会死亡?里面存在着什么问题? @医痴的木头屋授权:

Channel
重力倒转
@i365je94e4ixc56a
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002127825108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i365je94e4ixc56a |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i365je94e4ixc56a |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 51 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 53 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 53 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 29s
- Average length
- 11m 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
猫比人命大
QQ 空间归档 (QzoneArchive) - 将 QQ 空间历史动态、照片、视频与互动记录安全归档到本地 https://github.com/Gaoshu705/QzoneArchive 找回未开智时期留下的黑历史吧 😂 归档基于 QQ 空间的移动端互动列表接口 (mobile.qzone.qq.com/get_feeds)。该接口返回当前账号收到的所有互动通知 —— 包括好友发布的新动态、点赞、评论、回复、留言等。程序从中提取原始动态内容并存入本地数据库。 没有被点赞或评论过的动态无法被恢复,因为它们不会出现在互动列表中。 #GitHub
via 散散
KubeSolo - 移除多节点集群逻辑的单节点超轻量化 Kubernetes 发行版 https://kubesolo.io/ https://github.com/portainer/kubesolo #K8s #DevOps #Tool #GitHub 专门针对单节点边缘设备、工业网关与开发环境设计的超轻量级 OCI 兼容 Kubernetes,内存占用低于 200 MB,无需 etcd 和集群开销。 彻底移除集群冗余逻辑: 直接移除 etcd、 Leader 选举及多节点网络覆盖层代码,在单个进程中运行完整的 Kubernetes 控制循环。 SQLite 与轻量调度替代: 使用 Kine + SQLite 替换 etcd 作为状态存储,采用 NodeSetter 钩子完成单节点调度,减少系统资源消耗。 全套开箱即用集成: 内置 containerd、crun、CoreDNS 以及离线与在线双安装模式,支持在 512 M…
Keychron Nape Pro 轨迹球鼠标,想买一个试试,放在键盘下面代替鼠标,这个用法我太喜欢了。人生买的第一个键盘就是 Thinkpad 小红点,就是因为我不想因为少量用鼠标的需求让手轻易离开键盘 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIfsFvmQtvc 之前收藏过类似的产品有: • https://ploopy.co/ • https://github.com/Bastardkb/Charybdis
https://buildinpublic.com/gadgets
效率,是在目标已知时减少浪费。 文明,则要有能力承担一些无法证明其价值的浪费。 一个社会如果要求每件事情在发生以前都证明自己的价值,它最终只能优化已有世界,它或许会非常先进、非常高效、非常富裕,但会越来越难创造一个此前不存在的世界。 我想知道,我们究竟是在建设一个高效运行的社会,还是在积累一个足够厚、足够杂、允许后人踩上去继续长高的文明。
在 Zed DeltaDB 的 HN评论里看到了 "engineering privilege" 这个词:一些公司的工程师能长期做与核心产品无关的事,不断重造轮子,写新编译器、包管理器、框架……还不需要明显的营收承诺。这听起来让人羡慕,似乎也不太符合商业逻辑,但我们用的很多好东西正是这么来的。 曾经硅谷给人的印象就是这样一个地方:大公司给了程序员这群单纯的人无需为生活担忧的薪水、宽松的管理和自由探索的氛围,正是这些条件,催生了过去二十年无数举足轻重、影响深远的开源项目。更早的时候,在电子科技发展的初期,贝尔实验室那样的地方也是如此,为业界输出了无数改变世界的技术和人才。所以我一直觉得,Google 就是计算机和互联网领域的贝尔实验室。 学术界其实也一样,同样存在 "academia privilege"。学术界本就应该提供宽松的环境,鼓励人们出于对科学的热爱和自身的兴趣,在自己喜欢的方向上探索,而不是出于功利主义,为钱或为名…
一些 https://paseo.sh/ 的竞品清单 https://github.com/get-bb/bb https://github.com/pingdotgg/t3code https://github.com/openchamber/openchamber
Posted without readable text
迎合型 AI 削弱亲社会意愿并增加依赖感 (2025) 原文:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01395 阅读时间:2 分钟 分数:156
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @i365je94e4ixc56a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@hatschannel · 3,0854 postsReorx’s Forge
@reorx_share · 3,1933 postsOKHK 👀
@iokhk · 2,0422 postsGaryの梦呓
@GaryNoHeya · 2,9241 postTime经济观察
@TimeHorizonX · 20,8751 postHacker News 摘要
@hacker_news_zh · 2,2471 post404 KIDS SEE GHOSTS (生产力之王版
@isaiahsystem · 13,5731 postPseudorandom Thoughts
@prdm_thoughts · 7321 post单线程大摆锤
@repsiace · 7621 post心惊报
@xinjingdaily · 77,5021 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“重力倒转” (@i365je94e4ixc56a), 51 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i365je94e4ixc56a.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.