Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

404 KIDS SEE GHOSTS (生产力之王版

@isaiahsystem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,561subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001407174982
TypeChannel
Username@isaiahsystem
Description科技丨社科哲丨泛文化与艺术 Group: @ghosttown666 Contact: @madebyblackstack
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/isaiahsystem

Growth

13,56113,57513,5686 August 2026 — 13,575 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,573 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,569 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,568 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,569 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,562 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,561 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,559–13,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:1513,561-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:0313,562-7
10 Aug 2026, 16:3113,569+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:0213,568-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:4413,569-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:2613,573-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:1713,575first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 13,561 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.244%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 May 20264 August 2026)
Views total17,620
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
484
Videos
110
Links
1,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5132.5%
👍3622.9%
💅3119.7%
🔥2717.2%
🙉106.37%
❤‍🔥10.637%
👏10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,480 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

life is issues and triage #mood

6

Signed 志筑仁美

2 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC≈4,670 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://github.com/l0ng-ai/tty7 叛变了。最近爽用 tty7,真正原生面向 Agents 的壳子。 非常重要的 2 点优势:Cover Tmux 级别的后台复用和恢复,客户端关闭后进程继续;速度非常快。Fork pane 舒服。非常友好。 #agents #tools

👍11

Signed 志筑仁美

23 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC≈3,270 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Otty + Tmux,新壳子新玩具 从 iTerm2 + Tmux 换到了 Otty + Tmux,最近主要用 Otty 这个终端 ADE 工具,Typora 团队 Appmakes 出品,UI 舒服、细节成熟、编辑体验甚佳,极度舒适。 Otty 比较人性化的功能就是编辑框 Composer,Cmd+Shift+E Call 出纯文本编辑框,可以固定嵌入也可以单独悬浮(类似以前 iTerm 做的弹窗脚本)。Typora 这种注重格式编辑体验的团队出品,必然对编辑以及 UI 有极大的优化。这也是我比较喜欢 Otty 的原因。 其它细节比如非常完整的 UI 风格定义; Hover 顶部标题以及侧边栏筛选;Tab 3 种呈现形式以及右侧边栏的文件夹拖动成路径对话,Agents 运行和进度提示,都非常友好。Tmux 复用器随便换壳子,现在搭配 Otty 壳子,加 Multica 前台,极度舒适。 Typora,Craft Ag

🔥6

Signed 志筑仁美

21 Jul 2026, 01:38 UTC≈2,980 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

快乐的层次 第三层身体建造,健身和形态变化让我的身体、大脑和精神得到真实且宁静的快感;第二层意识建造,产出、代码和写作都属于意识凝结和建造,不过写作让我感到更加可塑、和谐,更贴近这种建造本身;第一层底模建造,无论是知识生产模型、社会理论模型还是更底层的世界框架,亦或纯粹的快乐科学,这种高于身体和意识的模型抽象毫无疑问地产出最大阈值快乐。 纯粹的生产性耗费快乐,热量、算力和熵值。 #thoughts

👍6

Signed 志筑仁美

20 Jul 2026, 23:36 UTC≈2,780 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Linear Loops/ Multica Autopilot Linear 最近新出的 Loops 基本类似 Multica Autopilot,围绕事件/ 时间触发 Agent,循迹预设 Instructions 自动拉起和持续处理工作。 Loops 是 Linear 的软件内功能,主要围绕应用内 Issue/ Project 以及各种 MCP 接口处理;Multica Autopilot 可以通过本地 daemon 拉起 Codex/ Claude Code/ Pi 等进行更完整的 Agents 和 Skills 环境工作。 目前我正在尝试将 Linear 和 Multica 完全联动使用。Linear 幻神级应用不用多说,Multica 更像所有完整生产线的部署场景,异星工厂。现在各种 API 自动化任务打通也非常方便,Linear 作为完整的上下文和 Dashboard,Multica 自动读写、执行以及回写状态

6👍2

Signed 志筑仁美

20 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈2,440 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Computer Use,我为什么不只用 Codex Codex Computer Use 仍然非常好用,把视觉识别、模拟点击、后台运行和跨 App 操作放进同一个 Agent 环境,随时拉起各种弱接口界面,是我自动化模块的重要部分。它现在问题是重启或长会话后授权失效,无法跨平台和模型使用。 所以我双持 Cua / Cua Driver:作为 Codex Computer Use 重要补位,Cua 具备极强的通用性和底层能力,是开源的 Computer Use 基础设施,它同样可以在后台操作本地应用,不抢前台焦点。Codex 无法使用和处理时,我会规定自动化模块让 Cua 接手,随时跨模型调用, 适配 MacOS/ Windows/ Linux 多端。 另外 Pi Computer Use 是 Pi Agent 的开源插件工具,也可以留意关注。Computer Use 算我自动化模块的保底层,类似过去 Keyboard

👍6

Signed 志筑仁美

4 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC≈3,720 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

豆包语音说话时静音 刚用 Karabiner 做了个脚本,启动豆包语音时系统自动静音,按 Fn 或任何按键时,取消静音(免按模式 Fn)。这个功能对我非常重要,否则播放音乐或媒体声音时说话都会录入系统声音。 Typeless 已经实现这个功能。目前我双持豆包语音和 Typeless,主要 Typeless 翻译按钮好用,Fn 和旁边按键两种语音输入随时切换。(脚本放评论) 相关链接: 豆包输入法单击 Fn 触发(豆包已经优化) #tools

2👏1

Signed 志筑仁美

24 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈4,930 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

加速主义者 #mood

💅313

Signed 志筑仁美

23 Jun 2026, 10:33 UTC≈4,320 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

东京和北京都具有强烈的秩序属性,只是前者是克制,后者是压抑。#whispers

🔥8

Signed 志筑仁美

16 Jun 2026, 06:51 UTC≈4,690 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://steamdb.info/sales/ Steam 夏促月底开始,这个网站可以看到所有当前折扣游戏以及史低价格。可以保持关注。#game

Signed 志筑仁美

16 Jun 2026, 01:40 UTC≈3,950 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

现在我用 AI 的方式更像是玩异星工厂,而非星际。Gamify 拟合程度越来越高。#whispers

3

Signed 志筑仁美

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @isaiahsystem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 83,298 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“404 KIDS SEE GHOSTS (生产力之王版” (@isaiahsystem), 13,561 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/isaiahsystem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.