Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1🤣1😁1

Channel
@hr_perfect_chat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,974subscribers
+65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001443874139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hr_perfect_chat |
| Description | Канал Агентства кадровых решений "HR Perfect" Чат - https://t.me/HR_Perfect |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hr_perfect_chat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:55 | 9,974 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:52 | 9,963 | +54 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 9,909 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 9,909 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (2 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,479 |
| Reactions total | 248 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
248 reactions across 43 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 21.8% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 20.6% | |
| 🔥 | 42 | 16.9% | |
| 🤣 | 40 | 16.1% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 14.1% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 6.45% | |
| ✍ | 9 | 3.63% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.403% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1🤣1😁1
МРОТ хотят поднять до 50 тысяч рублей с 1 января 2027 года. Что это значит для HR Группа депутатов от КПРФ во главе с первым зампредом ЦК партии Юрием Афониным направила в Правительство законопроект о повышении МРОТ до 50 000 рублей с 1 января 2027 года. Сейчас МРОТ составляет 27 093 рубля. Авторы инициативы аргументируют это высокой инфляцией, ростом цен на продукты и тарифов ЖКХ. По их мнению, 50 тысяч — это тот …
❤1👍1🔥1
Профилактический визит Роскомнадзора — теперь обязательный и с проверкой документов Роскомнадзор утвердил список операторов персональных данных, в отношении которых в 2026 году запланированы профилактические визиты (Приказ от 19.12.2025 № 390). Но главное — изменился сам формат визита. Что изменилось Ранее оператор мог отказаться от профилактического визита. Теперь для обязательных визитов отказ стал невозможен (Ф…
👍2❤1🔥1
Пять новых правил для HR За последний месяц принято сразу несколько важных законов и подзаконных актов. Собрали главное, что изменится в кадровой работе. 1. Стажировка становится официальным трудовым статусом (с 01.03.2027) Госдума приняла закон о стажировках для выпускников вузов и колледжей (№ 1252024-8). Теперь это полноценная работа по срочному трудовому договору до 6 месяцев с наставником, зарплатой не ниже М…
❤1👍1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
💯4🤣2😁1
Первая в России платформа для трудоустройства ветеранов СВО запускается на базе SuperJob Центр беспилотных систем и технологий (ЦБСТ) и сервис по поиску работы SuperJob создают первую в России специализированную платформу для трудоустройства ветеранов специальной военной операции. Проект реализуется при поддержке партии «Единая Россия». Платформа будет развернута на базе SuperJob и предоставит ветеранам доступ к ва…
❤2👍2🔥1
Обязательных справок с места работы стало больше. Актуальный перечень и риски для HR Список справок, которые работодатель обязан выдавать сотрудникам, вырос. Отказ или ошибка в оформлении могут привести к штрафам и судебным искам. Разбираем актуальный перечень и ключевые риски. 1. СТД-Р (при увольнении) Выдаётся автоматически в день увольнения работникам, перешедшим на электронную трудовую. Форма утверждена Минтру…
❤4👍2🔥2
Отзыв из отпуска: новые правила с 1 сентября для «вредников» и безопасный алгоритм для всех С 1 сентября 2026 года меняются правила отзыва из отпуска. Теперь в отдельных случаях можно отозвать даже работников с вредными или опасными условиями труда, но с жёсткими ограничениями. Что меняется Раньше отзыв «вредников» был запрещён абсолютно. Теперь, если это необходимо для предотвращения катастрофы, производственной …
👍2❤1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5💯3🤣3
Разбил машину в ДТП по своей вине — работодатель не обязан её возмещать. Но за расследование заплатит Системный инженер с разъездным характером работы использовал личный автомобиль — в договоре была прописана компенсация износа и топлива. Однажды, возвращаясь со служебного задания, он превысил скорость, улетел в кювет и разбил машину в хлам. ГИБДД признала виновным самого водителя. Инженер подлечился, поработал ещё…
❤2👍2🔥1
Новые правила для водителей с 1 сентября. Графики, договоры и ЛНА нужно переделать уже сейчас Утверждены новые правила режима работы и отдыха водителей (Приказ Минтранса от 14.04.2026 № 160). Изменения вступают в силу с 1 сентября 2026 года. Но графики работы нужно пересмотреть уже к 1 августа, а трудовые договоры и ЛНА — к 1 сентября. Разбираем главные изменения. 1. Еженедельный отдых — до начала 7-й смены Раньш…
✍2❤1🔥1
Порядок обучения по охране труда переписали: 5 правок, которые затронут кадровиков С 31 августа 2026 года вступают в силу 34 поправки в Порядок обучения по охране труда (Постановление № 2464). Пять из них напрямую касаются кадровой работы. Разбираем, что изменилось и что нужно успеть сделать. 1. Кадровик, назначенный ответственным за ОТ, теперь обязан проходить обучение по программам «А» и «Б» Если в компании нет …
👍2❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @hr_perfect_chat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,229,580 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HR Perfect” (@hr_perfect_chat), 9,974 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hr_perfect_chat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.