Channel
@hr_galyamova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
479subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002101263894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hr_galyamova |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hr_galyamova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 479 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 482 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 482 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
337 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 100 | 29.7% | |
| 🔥 | 71 | 21.1% | |
| 💯 | 56 | 16.6% | |
| 👍 | 42 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 33 | 9.79% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 4.15% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 1.78% | |
| 👻 | 5 | 1.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.89% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.89% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.89% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.297% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hr_galyamova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 January 2026 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
То, за что вы платите людям больше всего, обесценится первым. Свежий HR Monitor от McKinsey. Главный вывод отчёта простой: ручные навыки, на которых специалист строил свою ценность годами, теряют вес. А растёт в цене то, что раньше казалось второстепенным: умение думать, работать с данными и AI, проверять и понимать то, что выдала система. То есть ценен теперь не тот, кто всё держит в голове и руках. А тот, кто умее…
🔥9💯4👍2🤔2❤1
ПЕСНИ НА ЛЕТНИЕ КОРПОРАТИВЫ Эйчары, сохраняйте себе 😁😁👇👇 🔹 для разных возрастных групп 18-24 года 1️⃣ «Конь» (группа «Любэ») – 3,3 2️⃣ «Плывет веночек» (Надежда Кадышева) – 1,9 3️⃣ «Давай за …» (группа «Любэ») – 1,9 4️⃣ «Одинокая ветка сирени» (Валерий Залкин) – 1,5 5️⃣ «Батарейка» (группа «Жуки») – 1,4 25-34 года 1️⃣ «Конь» (группа «Любэ») – 6,3 2️⃣ «Матушка» (Татьяна Куртукова) – 3,7 3️⃣ «Батарейка» (группа «Жу…
😁6🔥4❤🔥2
К вопросу о профессиях будущего😅
😁13
Вчера услышала фразу: Нам разработали регламенты, инструкции, матрицы ответственности — но они не работают И я подумала: а что именно не работает - документ или система управления вокруг него? Регламент сам по себе не работает. Работает не файл. Работает регулярное управленческое действие. Можно повесить табличку «Курить запрещено». И часть людей действительно перестанет курить в этом месте. А часть — продолжит. П…
💯11❤7🔥4👍2
Консенсус - привычка спокойных лет, которая сейчас вредит бизнесу Коллеги, в свежем HBR руководители BCG и Saybrook на опыте реструктуризации United Airlines и Coca-Cola разбирают, почему поиск всеобщего согласия стал тормозом. Тезисы отрезвляющие. Два главных сбоя консенсуса: 1. Скорость умирает в цепочках Юристы, PR, комплаенс, ещё три согласующих, каждое звено снижает свои риски и приглаживает идею. Пока решен…
💯5🔥5❤4
С Днем Победы!
❤8🔥4🕊3
Вкладываетесь в рост сотрудников? Какая мысль греет или царапает больше?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
«Обучайте людей достаточно хорошо, чтобы они могли уйти. Относитесь к ним достаточно хорошо, чтобы они не захотели этого делать» Ричард Брэнсон - основатель Virgin Group
❤14💯7🔥6
Пишу коллеге: «Роадмап классный, но к смете есть вопросы». Рука на паузе. Перечитываю. И вдруг слышу, как это звучит не со своей стороны, а с её. Как будто всё, что она сделала, перечеркнуто одним «но». Удаляю. Пишу: «Роадмап огонь! 🔥 Давай созвонимся по смете, сверим цифры?» Смысл тот же, а ощущение другое. В переписке интонацию додумывает тот, кто читает. И чаще всего додумывает не в нашу пользу. Уже казалось …
👍17❤10🔥3😁1
– Да. Ты умеешь слушать. Это опасное оружие, потому что против него трудно устоять. Чувствовать, что тебя слушают, – это почти самое лучшее, что есть на свете. «Шантарам» Грегори Робертс
❤9🔥6👍4👏1💯1
Помните мемы про то, как ИИ ищет ИИ? Так вот, это уже не шутки. Один разработчик создал резюме, которое целиком состояло из рецепта пельменей. Фарш, тесто, лепка — всё честно. Итог: алгоритмы работного сайта проглотили это. Человек получил приглашение на собеседование. О чем это говорит? О том, что даже полная чушь проходит фильтры, если знать как. Смех смехом, а пока мы надеемся на умный отбор, мы упускаем тех, …
🔥10😁7❤5👻5💯3
HR-коллеги и Хабр делятся статисткой: за год количество вакансий, например, в IT-сфере сократилось на 44%. Конкуренция выросла до 20,7 резюме на одну вакансию (в январе 2025 было 9,9). Парадокс в том, что люди продолжают увольняться и искать место получше. Растущая конкуренция только заставляет их готовиться качественнее. Инженеры и крутые специалисты не будут сидеть и ждать, пока вы заметите их усталость и рутиннос…
❤14👍8🤔4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hr_galyamova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вкладываетесь в рост сотрудников? Какая мысль греет или царапает больше?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пользуетесь нейросетями?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 29 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Айгуль Галямова | HR” (@hr_galyamova), 479 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hr_galyamova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.