We got our own Button on Shib buy bot 😍 every buy will show our project. All projects on Shibarium will see us! Great News! And a BIG Thanks goes out!!
🔥5👍2❤1

Channel
@hoichiresearch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
171subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001730200874 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hoichiresearch |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 24 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hoichiresearch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 171 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 172 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 172 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 24 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
139 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 76 | 54.7% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 12.2% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 10.8% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 7.19% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 6.47% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 4.32% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 2.88% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2023 to 2 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We got our own Button on Shib buy bot 😍 every buy will show our project. All projects on Shibarium will see us! Great News! And a BIG Thanks goes out!!
🔥5👍2❤1
Bridge works completely fine! We had A LOT of traffic and $$$ over $$$ moved threw our gateway! 😊 we appreciate everyone who trusted our bridge and we are endless happy that we could provide such a nice working and flawless product. It's a major update for Shibarium and its community. Everyone is in the position to move funds in minutes from every chain too every chain!! When people realizing what they can do with t…
❤11
This is a real transaction. Moved 3755 Bone and it cost $7
❤3👍1
We finally take off. Our bridge+swap with 60 chains passed all tests and works lightning fast. We have the highest safety standards and a unbelievable smooth user experience. We will be live for everyone in the next days... the hard work finally pays off. Everyone is welcome to join our journey, our Torii gate is only the beginning :) We won't see these prices again!
🔥4👍1
We love conspiracy theories 🤙🏽
👍4
New and crazy front run from our dev. The group is private and some from our admins stay in constant contact with our dev. Till where do our connections go? 👀🔥
👍6❤2🤯1
1500 Tokens and 30+ Blockchains! Thanks again to the creator of this clip! 🤝🏻
❤21👍1
Big things comming boys and lads
🕊10❤8
@O369369369369 thanks for providing the info to me 🫡
❤10
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡6🤯1
https://twitter.com/nico85824222/status/1629321863687024642?s=28&t=Y6nXJ59tKcy_08c2CVzLQg
💯17❤5🤩2
Dan No Ura link In the dev medium takes us to this page (I've never seen hoichi the earless end with "One" anywhere else), and what role does @shibarium1 have on the Shibarium telegram?
❤15🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @hoichiresearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 735,529 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hoichiresearch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HOICHI RESEARCH 🎣” (@hoichiresearch), 171 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hoichiresearch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.