Channel
@bogdansark
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
488subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001697031842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bogdansark |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bogdansark |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 488 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 489 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
96 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 17.7% | |
| 💩 | 16 | 16.7% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 13.5% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 12.5% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 12.5% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 3.13% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2022 to 2 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$CASINU did 5x from the generational entry point/bottom and I've been DCA'ing all the way down. Why? There's a few reasons: - People forget ETH is not SOL or BSC where -90% from top means certain death. On ETH, generally, if the coin makes sense, -90% are great buying opportunities. (Some relatively recent examples that come to mind for coins that went a lot higher after -90% Smurfcat, Kizuna) -This is probably on…
❤9🔥3👍1
3x, and pepe dev just aped lfg
(OUT) degenharambe S: 1 Method: execute(bytes,bytes[],uint256) Sent: 20000.00 HarryPotterObamaSonic10Inu (BITCOIN) To: 0x2cC8...6d6482 Received: 37010039.02 Casinu Inu (CASINU) 0.04% From: 0x1a0D...CFe9ae TX / DEXT / DEFINED / DEXSC [MC: $2,887,796 - A: 2 hours ago]
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x1a0D2C9314909837119BaEfF8F6402d709CFe9ae Great narrative here, basically first inu invented by Vitalik himself. Dev generated a ca with matching characters from Vitalik's blog If this doesnt moon market is simply wrong https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/01/30/cryptoai.html
🔥1
Sorry for that, dev decided to be an asshole, unfortunately, wasted potential. Lost 3k 😕 I've been mostly sharing plays in my private group and hit a few bangers in there lately like babypepe 30k->9m, BOB 7x, mumu 7x, noot 20x and others.(even pump at 30k for a 30x but instead of taking profits I dcad and ended up losing) Will be keeping it open for a short bit. Edit: closed. If you think you can add value dm
👍2
Could be something, dont dm me if it goes to 0 tho
Apecoin cofounder the one who shilled Pepe early and sent it liked 3 of our tweets , not a coincidence $PUMP Tweet 1: https://twitter.com/FishNFT/status/1649253637384708099?s=20 Tweet 2: https://twitter.com/FishNFT/status/1649252319563849731?s=20 Tweet3: https://twitter.com/biddletron/status/1649257491388067842?s=46&t=UZNPdv1lKFB11uxxukAygA Second one doesnt even say pepe just $pump. Definitely hinting at someth…
Not sure if you noticed, but Hoichi has been the coin with the most posts from me, and for a reason. Believers getting rewarded now
🤣9❤2
If you have an apple device, time to update! Seems like a serious exploit: https://twitter.com/wallet_guard/status/1625331505131134980
❤1
GM, if you're not already in my private group, I will be opening it again for a little while, its where I will be sharing most of the random degen plays I ape, sometimes it works out like Shila which I shared at 10k market cap and did 100x after my share. Edit: closed
Sad to see things top at only 2.5x/ 100k lol, I didn't even approve but probably a smart thing to do in this market is to take initials out at least asap. (specially on degen plays) Dev of this had really good projects in the past, and some big accounts were willing to support(eric, tomtom, flur in chat) + burned liquidity and unique CA with no bots at start, the only reason I called it, sadly some max wallet dumper…
🤣6🐳3👍3😁1
aped this degen 40k https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x2ee803a07b7e9e611aa20d3ad61502f22e811e4d Website V1: https://wearelibertarian.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/L_ERC20 Telegram: https://t.me/L_ERC20
😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bogdansark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,029,011 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bogdan’s Ark” (@bogdansark), 488 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bogdansark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.