Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

پادکست تاریخ علم و اندیشه

@hisofscience

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,916subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001464499755
TypeChannel
Username@hisofscience
Created8 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hisofscience

Growth

1,9011,9161,908.56 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,903 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,912 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,916 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,899–1,918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:171,916+4
10 Aug 2026, 01:161,912+9
7 Aug 2026, 04:101,903+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:111,901first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 1,916 subscribers
Avg views / post
505
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held19 (23 November 202525 July 2026)
Views total1,010
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 04s
Average length
4m 32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

25 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC421 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AmirTravelsPhoto

ویدیو وبینار آشنایی با بابل باستان در یوتیوب منتشر شد نسخه‌ی کامل (68 دقیقه): https://youtu.be/ENA80Ki4SQ0?si=kJoCTOEDYMEVLu4k امیدوارم براتون مفید باشه 🙏🏼 @AmirTravels

15 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC900 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کتاب «هر آنچه سخت و استوار است دود می‌شود و به هوا می‌رود: تجربه مدرنیته» اثر مارشال برمن حرف اصلی مارشال برمن این است که مدرنیته یک تجربه متناقض و دیالکتیکی است. او مدرنیته را به یک «گرداب» تشبیه می‌کند؛ فضایی که به ما وعده ماجراجویی، قدرت، شادی و دگرگونی خود و جهان را می‌دهد، اما همزمان تهدید می‌کند که تمام دارایی‌ها، دانسته‌ها و هستی ما را نابود خواهد کرد [۱۶۴]. او این مضامین را از طریق تحلیل شخصیت‌هایی چون فاوس

15 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC941 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

نگاهی کلی به کتاب «هر آنچه سخت و استوار است دود می‌شود و به هوا می‌رود: تجربه مدرنیته» اثر مارشال برمن اصلاح خطای تلفظ: برهنگی @bookhearing

15 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

کتاب «هر آنچه سخت و استوار است دود می‌شود و به هوا می‌رود: تجربه مدرنیته» اثر مارشال برمن (نسخه ۱۹۸۸) بخش اول. فاوست گوته: تراژدی توسعه (صفحه ۳۷) • دگردیسی اول: رؤیاپرداز (صفحه ۴۱) • دگردیسی دوم: عاشق (صفحه ۵۱) • دگردیسی سوم: متمم/توسعه‌دهنده (صفحه ۶۰) • خاتمه: عصر فاوستی و شبه‌فاوستی (صفحه ۷۱) @bookhearing

11 May 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

ویدیو خلاصۀ اپیزود 41: پارادوکس سادگی: چرا مدل‌های نجومی مکتب مراغه پیچیده شدند؟ https://castbox.fm/app/castbox/player/id2624698/id943703274 @hisofscience

11 May 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

4⃣1⃣ پارادوکس سادگی: چرا مدل‌های نجومی مکتب مراغه پیچیده شدند؟ به بازخوانی یکی از مفاهیم بنیادین در تاریخ فیزیک و نجوم می‌پردازیم: «اصل سادگی». پارادوکس مدل ۱۶ کره‌ای عطارد چیست و چرا منجمان مکتب مراغه پیچیدگیِ کمّی را برای حفظ «سادگی کیفی» (حرکت یکنواخت) پذیرفتند؟ چگونه اصل «یکنواختی حرکت» در نجوم قدیم، به عنوان معیار اصلی بساطت و سادگی، زمینه‌ساز درک گالیله از سادگیِ طبیعت شد؟ منابع Gamini, A. M., & Sadrforati,

11 May 2026, 10:29 UTC855 viewsread 7 August 2026

4⃣1⃣ پارادوکس سادگی: چرا مدل‌های نجومی مکتب مراغه پیچیده شدند؟ https://castbox.fm/app/castbox/player/id2624698/id943703274 به بازخوانی یکی از مفاهیم بنیادین در تاریخ فیزیک و نجوم می‌پردازیم: «اصل سادگی». پارادوکس مدل ۱۶ کره‌ای عطارد چیست و چرا منجمان مکتب مراغه پیچیدگیِ کمّی را برای حفظ «سادگی کیفی» (حرکت یکنواخت) پذیرفتند؟ چگونه اصل «یکنواختی حرکت» در نجوم قدیم، به عنوان معیار اصلی بساطت و سادگی، زمینه‌ساز درک گ

28 Mar 2026, 16:07 UTC980 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @consolabsurdePhoto

تاب‌آوری در شرایط ابسورد #حلقه_کتابخوانی ‌ تسهیل‌گر: دکتر امیرمحمد گمینی عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تهران ‌ لینک کانال دکتر گمینی: @consolabsurde ‌ یکشنبه نهم فروردین - از ۱۷:۰۰ تا ۱۹:۰۰ ‌ لینک ثبت‌نام رایگان: zaya.io/absurde ‌ 🧠 @braincastmedia

23 Mar 2026, 12:50 UTC931 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @consolabsurde

پست هشتم: «عشق به سرنوشت» در پست قبلی دیدیم که جهان چقدر نسبت به ما بیگانه و «کدر» است. حالا پرسش این است: در برابر این بیگانگی و در میانهٔ سختی‌های بزرگی مثل جنگ، چه باید کرد؟ پاسخ را از زبانِ جانِ بی‌قرارِ تاریخ، *فردریش نیچه*، بشنویم. او مفهومی را به ما هدیه می‌دهد که در سخت‌ترین لحظاتِ قرن جدید (۱۴۰۵)، می‌تواند چراغِ راهِ ما باشد: *Amor Fati* یا «عشق به سرنوشت»: My formula for greatness in a human being is amo

22 Feb 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کلاسهای من در این ترم به روی علاقمندان باز شد. محل: ساختمان جدید پژوهشکده تاریخ علم

30 Dec 2025, 06:21 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @haameeorgPhoto

🔵 سخنرانان همایش نظم مهندسی فهم انسانی 👤دکتر امیرمحمد گمینی، پژوهشکده تاریخ علم دانشگاه تهران امیرمحمد گمینی، عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه تهران، پژوهشگری است که تمرکز اصلی مطالعاتش بر تاریخ نجوم و کیهان‌شناسی در دوران قدیم و چگونگی ورود علم مدرن به ایران و چالش‌های این مواجهه است. شاید مهم‌ترین ویژگی او نگاه انتقادی و شجاعانه‌اش به روایت‌های رایج از تاریخ علم باشد؛ او در کتاب «گزاف‌نمایی در تاریخ علم ایران و اسلام» به نقد

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hisofscience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 975,216 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پادکست تاریخ علم و اندیشه” (@hisofscience), 1,916 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hisofscience.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.