Channel
@hikmamashriqyya
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,407subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001497869421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hikmamashriqyya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hikmamashriqyya |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@hikmamashriqyya was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 3,407 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 3,408 | +10 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 3,398 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 3,396 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 3,395 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 3,397 | +8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 3,389 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 3,387 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 3,381 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 3,382 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 3,382 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 34 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 64.7% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 8.82% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.94% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚 شرح کتاب النجاة ابنسینا (بخش طبیعیات) 🖋 فخرالدين اسفراینی 📝 بهتصحیح عزتالملوک قاسمقاضی، مقصود محمّدی 🗓 شهریور ۱۴۰۵ 🖨 انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی #طبیعیات #ابنسینا 🌾 @naturalphilosophy
❤2
https://mashshai.substack.com/p/averroes-on-why-you-should-avoid?r=4on5dv&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
✅ تصنیف غزل رهبر شهید انقلاب منتشر شد قطعه موسیقی «به رَسم کِرام» با غزلی از رهبر شهید انقلاب «امین» در نجوا با امام رضا علیهالسلام با صدای حسامالدین سراج و آهنگسازی امیرحسین سمیعی منتشر شد. ✅ @BisimchiMedia
❤4
آیین بزرگداشت حکیم بوعلی سینا سخنرانان: سید یحیی یثربی سید محمود یوسف ثانی انشالله رحمتی قاسم پورحسن محمد رئیس زاده محمود شالویی سه شنبه ۲۷ مرداد ۱۴۰۵، ساعت ۱۶ تالار اجتماعات شهید مطهری (ره)، انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی 🔰@ghpourhasan_ir
https://t.me/Aristotle_Marx
👎3
القاضي الشارح: فإن كنت من أهل الفطرة المعدة لقبول العلوم و كنت من أهل الثبات و اهل الفراغ فعرضتك ان تنظر في كتب القوم و علومهم لتقف على ما في كتبهم من حق أو ضده و ان كنت ممن نقصك واحد من هذه الثلاث فعرضتك ان تفرغ في ذلك إلى ظاهر الشرع و لا تنظر الى هذه العقائد المحدثة في الإسلام فإنك ان كنت من أهلها لم تكن من اهل اليقين و لا من أهل الشرع
❤3
في المقابسات، يسأل العالم الأديب أبو حيان التوحيدي أبا سليمان المنطقي عن الفرق بين طريقة الفلاسفة والمتكلمين في النظر والبحث. ويصف السجستاني طريقة الفريق الأخير على النحو الآتي (وهو وصف لا يتجلى صدقه في شيء بمثل ما يتجلى في سلوك بعض المتحمسين لهم في زماننا): ما هو ظاهر لكل ذي تمييز وعقل وفهم طريقتهم مؤسسة على مكايل اللفظ باللفظ وموازنة الشيء بالشيء إما بشهادة من العقل مدخولة وإما بغير شهادة منه البتة والاعتماد على ا…
❤3👎2🔥1
https://t.me/+WUesbbGNPUfEw7G0
https://sites.tufts.edu/nehpoetics/2026/03/30/a-new-digital-edition-of-the-poetics/?fbclid=IwY2xjawTsSPFwZG9mAWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkEDIyMjAzOTE3ODgyMDA4OTIAAR4Xr6yVSqtTM-mraH4rsj41Lso2-iBzq7h-Av14k8VVPxNmKlfUzfOKjZplrA_aem_EWbk7WE6GY3jcWo3_Ftweg
✍ بالأخره انتظار به پایان رسید و دورهٔ کامل تصحیح کتاب ارزشمند القانون فی الطب ابنسینا در ۱۴ مجلد منتشر شد. 📚 این تصحیح که حاصل بیش از دو دهه تلاش مصحّح توانمند آن جناب استاد علیرضا مسعودی است، بیشک بهترین تصحیحی است که تا کنون از این کتاب دورانساز انجام پذیرفته است. 📖 از ویژگیهای خوب این تصحیح این است که در ۱۱هزار صفحه خود، نهتنها متن القانون في الطب را به خوبی بازتاب داده است، بلکه بخشهای معتنابهی از مهمتر…
❤1
قوله نقداً للشيخ: و أما هل تفضى الطريقة التي سلكها ابن سينا في واجب الوجود و ممكن الوجود إلى نفى مركب قديم فليس تفضى الى ذلك ... فان هذا القول انما يؤدى من جهة امتناع التسلسل الى موجود ضروري لا علة له فاعلة لا الى موجود ليس له علة أصلا لانه يمكن ان يكون له علة صورية أو مادية إلا ان يوضع ان كل ما له مادة و صورة و بالجملة كل مركب فواجب ان يكون له فاعل خارج عنه و هذا يحتاج الى بيان و لم يتضمنه القول المسلوك في بيان واج…
❤1👍1
But then, in the chapter on the discipline of theology (kalām), Ibn Khaldun urges that tawḥīd demands giving up on making causal inquiries into phenomena (specifically psychological phenomena but his point isn’t limited to that domain). In other words, that tawḥīd demands occasionalism – that dreaded doctrine so, as Ibn Rushd put it, foreign to human nature. Ibn Khaldun states: Intentions and volitions are psycholog…
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @hikmamashriqyya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الحكمة المشّائية الاسلامية🔻” (@hikmamashriqyya), 3,407 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hikmamashriqyya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.